Is incident sensitization to p-phenylenediamine related to particular exposure patterns? Results of a questionnaire study

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 266-270

  Uter, Wolfgang ^a   Hillen, Uwe ^b   Geier, Johannes ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Active sensitization; CAS 106 50 3; p phenylenediamine; Patch testing

Indexed keywords

HAIR DYE; HENNA; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTACT ALLERGY; DERMATOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HAIRDRESSER; HUMAN; INFORMATION CENTER; MALE; PATCH TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TATTOO; TEXTILE;

ALLERGENS; COLORING AGENTS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; PHYTOTHERAPY; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 34247203760     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01106.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Calnan C D. Active sensitization to para and balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 126-127.
2. Le Coz C J, El Bakali A, Untereiner F, Grosshans E. Active sensitization to budesonide and para-phenylenediamine from patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 153-155.
3. Devos S A, van der Valk P G M. The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 273-275.
4. Hillen U, Jappe U, Frosch P J, Becker D, Brasch J, Lilie M, Fuchs T, Kreft B, Pirker C, Geier J. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol 2006: 154: 665-670.
5. Dawe S A, White I R, Rycroft R J, Basketter D A, McFadden J P. Active sensitization to para-phenylenediamine and its relevance: a 10-year review. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 51: 96-97.
6. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch P J. The epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998: 8: 36-40.
7. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Becker D, Fuchs T, Richter G. Die Epikutantestung mit "Parastoffen". Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 2002: 50: 97-104.
8. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 51: 47-56.
9. Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J, Lessmann H, Pfahlberg A, Schnuch A. Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Sensibilisierung gegen wichtige Allergene von arbeitsbedingten sowie individuellen Faktoren. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Forschung, Fb 949. Bremerhaven: 2002.
10. Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen O B. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 62-67.
11. Jensen C D, Andersen K E. Course of contact allergy in consecutive eczema patients patch tested with TRUE Test panels 1 and 2 at least twice over a 12-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 242-246.
12. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Brasch J. Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der Epikutantestung - Die Bewertung der Konkordanz bei synchroner Applikation. Allergologie 2002: 25: 415-419.