Magnetic field control of exchange and noise immunity in double quantum dots

Nano Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1778-1782

  Stopa, M ^a   Marcus, C M ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTI-CROSSING MODELS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL; DETUNING; DOUBLE QUANTUM DOTS; EIGENSTATES; EXACT DIAGONALIZATION; MAGNETIC FIELD CONTROLS; NOISE IMMUNITIES; SINGLET-TRIPLET SPLITTING; SWEET SPOTS; VOLTAGE NOISE;

ATOMS; CURRENT VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS; MAGNETIC FIELDS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

QUANTUM DOT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; MAGNETISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MAGNETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 47349114948     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl801282t     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. (a) Bray, A. J.; Moore, M. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 1545.
2. (b) Caldeira, A. O.; Leggett, A. J. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1059.
3. (a) Nielsen, M. A.; Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000.
4. (b) Vandersypen. L. M. K., Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, July, 2001.
5. Coish, W. A.; Loss, D. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 125337.
6. Hu, X.; Das Sarma, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 100501.
7. Vion, D.; et al. Science 2005, 296, 886.
8. Petta, J.; et al. Science 2005, 309, 2180.
9. (a) Hanson, R.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 196802.
10. (b) Johnson, A. C.; et al. Nature 2005, 435, 925.
11. (c) Koppens, F. H. L.; et al. Science 2005, 309, 1346.
12. (d) Hatano, T.; Stopa, M.; Tarucha, S. Science 2005, 309, 268.
13. (e) Hatano, T.; Stopa, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ota, T.; Yamada, K.; Tarucha, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 066806.
14. (f) Elzerman, J. M.; et al. Nature 2004, 430, 431.
15. Field, M; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 1311.
16. Elzerman, J. M.; et al. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 161308.
17. The magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the device plane and only orbital (i.e. not Zeeman) effects are included.
18. (a) Stopa. M. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 13767.
19. (b) Stopa, M. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1998, 13, A55.
20. (c) Burkard, G.; Loss, D.; DiVincenzo. D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 2070.
21. (d) Szafran, B.; Peelers. S.; Bednarek. S. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 205318.
22. (e) Melnikov, D.; et al. Phvs. Rev. B 2006, 70, 041309.
23. van der Wiel, W.; et al. New Journal of Physics 2006, 8, 28.
24. (a) Löwdin, P. Phys. Rev. 1955, 97, 1474.
25. (b) Fulde, P. Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids; Springer: Berlin. Heidelberg, 1995.
26. Ciorga, M.; et al. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, R16315.
27. We use "1" and "2" to denote the lowest two single particle levels localized in one or the other dot.
28. 1 in top panel of Figure 1c).
29. Edward Laird, private communication.
30. Sasaki, S.; et al. Nature (London) 2000, 405, 764.
31. (a) Hu, X.; Das Sarma, S. Phy. Rev. A 2000, 61, 062301.
32. (b) Stopa, M. Physica E 2001, 10, 103.
33. David Reilly, private communication.
34. Fujisawa, T.; Hirayama, Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 543.
35. Lu, W.; et al. Nature 2003, 423, 422.