Chemical and visual communication dining mate searching in rock shrimp

Biological Bulletin

Volumn 206, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 134-143

  Díaz, Eliecer R ^a   Thiel, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL NORTE   (Chile)

^b CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS EN ZONAS ÁRIDAS CEAZA   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; CRUSTACEAN; MATE LOCATION; VISUAL CUE;

ANIMALIA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); HOMARUS AMERICANUS; LOBSTER; RHYNCHOCINETES; RHYNCHOCINETES TYPUS; SICYONIIDAE;

EID: 3042535052     PISSN: 00063185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1543637     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acquistapace, P., L. Aquiloni, B. A. Hazlett, and F. Gherardi. 2002. Multimodal communication in crayfish: sex recognition during mate search by male Austropotamobius pallipes. Can J. Zool. 80: 2041-2045.
2. Atema, J. 1986. Review of sexual selection and chemical communication in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 2283-2290.
3. Atema, J. 1995. Chemical signals in the marine environment: dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 62-66.
4. Atema, J., and J. S. Cobb. 1980. Social behavior. Pp. 409-450 in The Biology and Management of Lobsters. J. S. Cobb and B. F. Phillips, eds. Academic Press, NY.
5. Atema, J., and D. F. Cowan. 1986. Sex-identifying urine and molt signals in lobster Homarus americanus. J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 2065-2080.
6. Atema, J., and R. Voigt. 1995. Behavior and sensory biology. Pp. 313-348 in The Biology of the Lobster, Homarus americanus, J. R. Factor, ed. Academic Press, New York.
7. Atema, J., S. Jacobsen, E. Karnofsky, S. Oleszko-Szuts, and L. Stein. 1979. Pair formation in the lobster, Homarus americanus: behavioral development, pheromones and mating. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 6: 277-296.
8. Backwell, P., M. Jennions, N. Passmore, and J. Christy. 1998. Synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs. Nature 391: 31-32.
9. Bamber, S. D., and E. Naylor. 1996. Chemical communication and behavioural interaction between sexually mature male and female shore crabs (Carcinus maenas). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 76: 691-699.
10. Barlow, R. B., L. C. Ireland, and L. Kass. 1982. Vision has a role in Limulus mating behavior. Nature 296: 65-66.
11. Borowsky, B. 1991. Patterns of reproduction of some amphipod crustaceans and insights into the nature of their stimuli. Pp. 33-49 in Crustacean Sexual Biology, R. T. Bauer and J. W. Martin, eds. Columbia University Press, New York.
12. Bouchard, S., B. Sainte-Marie, and J. N. McNeil. 1996. Indirect evidence indicates female semiochemicals release male precopulatory behaviour in the snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio (Brachyura: Majidae). Chemoecology 7: 39-44.
13. Breithaupt, T., and J. Atema. 2000. The timing of chemical signaling in dominance fights of male lobsters (Homarus americanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 67-78.
14. Breithaupt, T., and P. Eger. 2002. Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 1221-1231.
15. Burggren, W. W., and B. R. McMahon. 1988. Biology of the Land Crabs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Bushmann, P. J. 1999. Concurrent signals and behavioral plasticity in blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) courtship. Biol. Bull. 197: 63-71.
17. Bushmann, P. J., and J. Atema. 1997. Shelter sharing and chemical courtship signals in the lobster Homarus americanus. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 647-654.
18. Bushmann, P. J., and J. Atema. 2000. Chemically mediated mate location and evaluation in the lobster, Homarus americanus. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: 883-899.
19. Caillaux, L. M., and W. Stotz. 2003. Distribution and abundance of Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards (Crustacea: Decapoda: Rhynchocinetidae) in different benthic community structures in northern Chile. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 83: 143-150.
20. Caldwell, R. L., and H. Dingle. 1979. The influence of size differential on agonistic encounters in the mantis shrimp, Gonodactylus viridis. Behaviour 69: 255-264.
21. Christy, J. H. 1987. Competitive mating, mate choice and mating associations of brachyuran crabs. Bull. Mar. Sci. 41: 177-191.
22. Christy, J. H., and M. Salmon. 1991. Comparative studies of reproductive behavior in mantis shrimps and fiddler crabs. Am. Zool. 31: 329-337.
23. Christy, J. H., P. R. Y. Backwell, and U. Schober. 2003. Interspecific attractiveness of structures built by courting male fiddler crabs: experimental evidence of a sensory trap. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 84-91.
24. Correa, C., and M. Thiel. 2003a. Mating systems in caridean shrimp (Decapoda: Caridea) and their evolutionary consequences for sexual dimorphism and reproductive biology. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 76: 187-203.
25. Correa, C., and M. Thiel. 2003b. Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J. Crustac. Biol. 23: 849-861.
26. Correa, C., J. A. Baeza, E. Dupré, I. A. Hinojosa, and M. Thiel. 2000. Mating behavior and fertilization success of three ontogenetic stages of male rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J. Crustac. Biol. 20: 628-640.
27. Correa, C., J. A. Baeza, I. A. Hinojosa, and M. Thiel. 2003. Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J. Crustac. Biol. 23: 33-45.
28. Cowan, D. F. 1991. The role of olfaction in courtship behavior of the American lobster Homarus americanus. Biol. Bull. 181: 402-407.
29. Cowan, D. F., and J. Atema. 1990. Moult staggering and serial monogamy in American lobsters, Homarus americanus. Anim. Behav. 39: 1199-1206.
30. Derby, C. D., and P. Steullet. 2001. Why do animals have so many receptors? The role of multiple chemosensors in animal perception. Biol. Bull. 200: 211-215.
31. Díaz, E. R., and M. Thiel. 2003. Female rock shrimp prefer dominant males. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 83: 941-942.
32. Dunham, P. J. 1978. Sex pheromones in Crustacea. Biol. Rev. 53: 555-583.
33. Gleeson, R. A. 1991. Intrinsic factors mediating pheromone communication in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Pp. 17-32 in Crustacean Sexual Biology, R. T. Bauer and J. W. Martin, eds. Columbia University Press, New York.
34. Hassler, C., and H. J. Brockmann. 2001. Evidence for use of chemical cues by male horseshoe crabs when locating nesting females (Limulus polyphemus). J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 2319-2335.
35. Hatziolos, M. E. and R. L. Caldwell. 1983. Role reversal in courtship in the stomatopod Pseudosquilla ciliata (Crustacea). Anim. Behav. 31: 1077-1087.
36. Hinojosa, I. A., and M. Thiel. 2003. Somatic and gametic resources in male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus: effect of mating potential and ontogenetic male stage. Anim. Behav. 66: 449-458.
37. Hughes, M. 1996. The function of concurrent signals: visual and chemical communication in snapping shrimp. Anim. Behav. 52: 247-257.
38. Kamio, M., S. Matsunaga, and N. Fusetani. 2002. Copulation pheromone in the crab Telmessus cheiragonus (Brachyura: Decapoda). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 234: 183-190.
39. Karavanich, C., and J. Atema. 1998. Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim. Behav. 56: 1553-1560.
40. Karnofsky, E. B., J. Atema, and R. H. Elgin. 1989. Field observations of social behavior, shelter use, and foraging in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol. Bull. 176: 239-246.
41. Kelly, L. S., and T. W. Snell. 1998. Role of surface glycoproteins in mate-guarding of the marine harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Mar. Biol. 130: 605-612.
42. Latruffe, C., P. K. McGregor, and M. F. Oliveira. 1999. Visual signalling and sexual selection in male fiddler crabs Uca tangeri. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 189: 233-240.
43. Marshall, J., T. W. Cronin, N. Shashar, and M. Land. 1999. Behavioural evidence for polarisation vision in stomatopods reveals a potential channel for communication. Curr. Biol. 9: 755-758.
44. Pope, D. S. 2000. Testing function of fiddler crab claw waving by manipulating social context. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6: 432-437.
45. Salmon, M. 1983. Courtship, mating systems; and sexual selection in decapods. Pp. 143-169 in Studies in Adaptation: The Behavior of Higher Crustaceans, S. Rebach and D. Dunham, eds. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
46. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
47. Sneddon, L. U., F. A. Huntingford, A. C. Taylor, and A. S. Clare. 2003. Female sex pheromone-mediated effects on behavior and consequences of male competition in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas). J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 55-70.
48. Thiel, M., and I. Hinojosa. 2003. Mating behavior of female rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea) - indication for convenience polyandry and cryptic female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 113-121.
49. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
50. Zulandt Schneider, R. A., R. Huber, and P. A. Moore. 2001. Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. Behaviour 138: 137-153.