Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education

European Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 283-295

  Lehmann, M ^a   Christensen, P ^a   Du, X ^a   Thrane, M ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Aalborg model; Engineering education; Innovation; PBL; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 47349106371     PISSN: 03043797     EISSN: 14695898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03043790802088566     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for quality learning at University. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Philadelphia:, Open University Press
2. Bregnhøj, H. and Lehmann, M. (2000) DUCED-I&UA Review of TFS Projects in Thailand 2000, DUCED-I&UA, Aalborg
3. De Graaff, E. and Kolmos, A. (2003) Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19:5, pp. 657-662.
4. Du, X. -Y. (2006) Bringing new values into engineering education: Gender and learning in a PBL environment, Aalborg University
5. Du, X-Y. and Kolmos, A. (2006) process competence in a problem and project based learning environment. Proceedings of the 34th SEFI Annual Conference: Engineering Education and Active Students, Sweden
6. Edquist, C. and Johnson, B. (1997) Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, pp. 41-63. Pinter/Cassell Academic, London and Washington
7. Gibbs, G. (1999) Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. Assessment Matters in higher education, Open University Press
8. Ingeniøren (2004) Fra upopulár rebel til klassens duks (From unpopular rebel to A-student). Ingeniøren, pp. 4-5.
9. Jamison, A. and Nielsen, E. H. (2005) The Aalborg approach to environmental management. Sustainable development and the university. New strategies for research, teaching and practice, pp. 405-416. Brevitas, Howick, South Africa
10. Kjárgård, B. and Bondesen, E. (1997) Báredygtighedsidealet og nyere reguleringstrategier på miljøområdet. Miljøregulering - tvárfaglige studier, pp. 340-361. Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Frederiksberg
11. Kolmos, A. and de Graaff, E. (2007) Process of changing to PBL. Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering, pp. 31-44. SENSE Publisher, Rotterdam
12. Kolmos, A. (2006) Future engineering skills, knowledge, and identity. Engineering science, skills, and Bildung, pp. 165-185. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg
13. Konrad, A., Steurer, R., Langer, M. E. and Martinuzzi, A. (2006) Empirical findings on business-society relations in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 63:1, pp. 89-105.
14. Larsen, J. and Lehmann, M. (1998) Application of cleaner technology/ environmental management in the Saa-industry, Aalborg University
15. Larsen, J. (1999) Anaerobic Treatment of pulping wastewater with focus on energy recovery at a medium sized Saa-paper factory in Thailand, Aalborg University
16. Meadowcroft, J. (1997) Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics?. Planning sustainability, pp. 12-38. Routledge, London and New York
17. Neumayer, E. (2003) Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton
18. Rickards, T. (1985) Stimulating innovation: A systems approach, Frances Pinter, London
19. Scott, R. (2001) Institutions and organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
20. Sopajaree, K., Larsen, J. and Lehmann, M. (1999) Proceedings of Inter-Regional Symposium on Sustainable Development (ISSD), pp. 338-348. Kanchanaburi
21. Spangenberg, J. H. and Bonniot, O. (1998) Sustainability indicators:A compass on the road towards sustainability. Wuppertal Papers, 81
22. Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A. and Martinuzzi, A. (2005) Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development i: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61:2, pp. 263-281.