The multicultural society in the Netherlands: Technology-supported inquiry-based learning in an inter-institutional context

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 437-447

  Verbaan, Eddy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cross institutional learning; Inquiry based learning; Networked learning; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 47349094747     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510802169715     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
2. Brown, N., Galloway, A. and Brennan, C. (1999) Videoconferencing: Active reflection on new technologies when lecturing. Active Learning, 11, pp. 36-39.
3. Fritze, Y. and Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2004) Comparing lectures: Effects of the technological context of the studio. Education and Information Technologies, 8:4, pp. 327-343.
4. Gibbs, G. (1999) Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, pp. 41-53. SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
5. Hall, R. (2003) Forging a learning community? A pragmatic approach to co-operative learning. Art and Humanities in Higher Education, 2:2, pp. 155-172.
6. Hermans, T. (2002) Up and running: The virtual department of Dutch. ALCS Newsletter, 6:1, pp. 2-3.
7. Kahn, P. and O'Rourke, P. (2005) Understanding enquiry-based learning. Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning: Irish case studies and international perspectives, pp. 1-12. AISHE and CELT, NUI Galway
8. de Laat, M. F. (2006) Networked learning.
9. de Laat, M. F., Lally, V. and Lipponen, L. (2005) Teaching online in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach (Worldwide Universities Network).
10. Lobry de Bruyn, L. (2004) Monitoring online communication: Can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment?. Distance Education, 25:1, pp. 67-81.
11. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C. and d'Apollonia, S. (2001) Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71:3, pp. 449-521.
12. MacDonald, R. (2005) Assessment strategies for enquiry and problem-based learning. Handbook of enquiry and problem-based learning: Irish case studies and international perspectives, pp. 85-93. AISHE and CELT, NUI Galway
13. McConnell, D. (2002) Action research and distributed problem-based learning in continuing professional education. Distance Education, 23:1, pp. 59-83.
14. McConnell, D. (2005) Examining the dynamics of networked e-learning groups and communities. Studies in Higher Education, 30:1, pp. 25-42.
15. Murphy, E. and Coleman, E. (2004) Graduate students' experiences of challenges in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
16. Orrill, C. H. (2002) Suporting online PBL: Design considerations for supporting distributed problem solving. Distance Education, 23:1, pp. 41-57.
17. Plowright, D. and Watkins, M. (2004) There are no problems to be solved, only inquiries to be made, in social work education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41:2, pp. 185-206.
18. Smyth, R. (2005) Broadband videoconferencing as a tool for learner-centred distance learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36:5, pp. 805-820.
19. Wiesenberg, F. and Stacey, E. (2005) Reflections on teaching and learning online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26:3, pp. 385-404.