Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: Implications for forensic anthropology

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 771-776

  Grivas, Christopher R ^a   Komar, Debra A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Daubert; Expert testimony; Federal Rules of Evidence; Forensic anthropology; Forensic science; Identification; Kumho; Taphonomy; Trauma assessment

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORENSIC SCIENCE; INJURY; PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TAPHONOMY; WITNESS;

EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMANS;

EID: 47349090778     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00771.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (74)

1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 1993).
2. Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 US 137 1999).
3. Haack S. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science. Am J Public Health 2005 95 : S66 73.
4. Gold JA, Zaremski MJ, Lev ER, Shefrin DH. Daubert v. Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom. JAMA 1993 270 : 2964 7.
5. Faigman DL, Porter E, Saks MJ. Check your crystal ball at the courthouse door, please: exploring the past, understanding the present, and worrying about the future of scientific evidence. Cardozo Law Rev 1994 15 : 1799 835.
6. Farrell MG. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: epistemology and legal process. Cardoza Leg Rev 1994 15 : 2183 217.
7. Imwinkelried EJ. Next step after Daubert: developing a similarly epistemological approach to ensuring the reliability of nonscientific expert testimony. Cardozo Law Rev 1994 15 : 2271 94.
8. Zonana H. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts? Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1994 22 : 309 25.
9. Bohan TL, Heels EJ. The case against Daubert: the new scientific evidence "standard" and standards in several states. J Forensic Sci 1995 40 : 1030 44.
10. O'Connor S. The Supreme Court's philosophy of science: will the real Karl Popper please stand up? Jurimetrics 1995 35 : 263 76.
11. Leiter B. The epistemology of admissibility: why even good philosophy of science would not make for good philosophy of evidence. BYU Law Rev 1997 1997 : 803 20.
12. Brautbar N. Science and the law: scientific evidence, causation, admissibility, reliability "Daubert" decision revisited. Toxicol Ind Health 1999 15 : 532 51.
13. Saks MJ. The aftermath of Daubert: an evolving jurisprudence of expert evidence. Jurimetrics 2000 40 : 235 6.
14. Auxier JA, Prichard HM. The role of the expert witness: an update. Health Phys 2001 81 : 269 71.
15. Norton ML. The physician expert witness and the U.S. Supreme Court-an epidemiologic approach. Med Law 2002 21 : 435 49.
16. Christensen AM. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification). J Forensic Sci 2004 49 : 427 30.
17. Christensen AM. Testing the reliability of frontal sinuses in positive identification. J Forensic Sci 2005 50 : 18 22.
18. Rogers TL, Allard TT. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns. J Forensic Sci 2004 49 : 203 7.
19. Rogers TL. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. J Forensic Sci 2005 50 : 493 500.
20. Koot MG, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW. Radiographic human identification using bones of the hand: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 2005 50 : 263 8.
21. Camieriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Rollo FU, Cingolani M. Frontal sinuses for identification: quality of classifications, possible error and potential corrections. J Forensic Sci 2005 50 : 770 3.
22. Williams BA, Rogers TL. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. J Forensic Sci 2006 51 : 729 35.
23. Berger MA. What has a decade of Daubert wrought? Am J Public Health 2005 95 : S59 65.
24. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 D.C. Cir. 1923).
25. Sanders J. Kumho and how we know. Law Contemp Probl 2001 64 : 373 415.
26. Risinger DM, Saks MJ, Thompson WC, Rosenthal R. The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. Calif Law Rev 2002 90 : 3 56.
27. Wellborn OG. Cases and materials on the rules of evidence. St Paul : Thomson/West, 2005.
28. Federal Rules of Evidence. http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/ printers/109th/31310.pdf 2006).
29. Huber P. Galileo's revenge: junk science in the courtroom. New York : Basic Books, 1992.
30. Berger MA. The Supreme Court's trilogy on the admissibility of expert testimony. In : Cecil J, Milatech D, editors. Reference manual on scientific evidence. 2nd edn. Washington, DC : Federal Justice Center, 2000 9 38. http://www.fjc.gov/public/home.nsf/pages/610.
31. Federal Rules Committee. Federal Rules of Evidence: notes to rule 702. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/ACRule702.htm Accessed Oct. 26, 2007.
32. Gatowski SI, Doblin SA, Richardson JT, Ginsburg GP, Merlino ML, Dahir V. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges and judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law Hum Behav 2001 25 : 433 58.
33. Cecil JS. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert. Am J Public Health 2005 95 : S74 80.
34. Neufield PJ. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform. Am J Public Health 2005 95 : S107 13.
35. General Electric Co., v. Joiner, 522 US 136 1997).
36. Kaiser J. Should engineer witnesses meet same standards as scientists? Science 1998 281 : 1578.
37. Vidmar N, Lempert RO, Seidman DS, Hans VP, Landsman S, MacCoun R, et al. Amicus brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael. Law Hum Behav 2000 24 : 387 400.
38. Krafka CL, Dunn MA, Johnson MT, Cecil JS, Miletech D. A survey of judges' and attorneys' experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. Psychol Public Policy Law 2002 8 : 251 308.
39. Imwinkelried EJ. Evaluating the reliability of nonscientific expert testimony: a partial answer to questions left unresolved by Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. ME Law Rev 2000 52 : 19 41.
40. Bucklin LH. Getting the opinion in. http://www.bucklin.org/Daub_TofC.htm. 2006. Accessed Sept. 3, 2007.
41. Risinger DM. Preliminary thoughts on a functional taxonomy of expertise for the post-Kumho world. Seton Hall Law Rev 2000 31 : 508 37.
42. Saks MJ. Banishing Ipse Dixit: the impact of Kumho Tire on forensic identification science. Washington and Lee Law Rev 2000 57 : 1069 141.
43. Keierleber JA. Reliable evaluation of expert testimony [note]. Harvard Law Rev 2003 116 : 2142 63.
44. Cheng EK, Yoon AH. Does Frye or Daubert matter? A study of scientific admissibility standards. Virginia Law Rev 2005 91 : 471 513.
45. Keierleber JA, Bohan TL. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states. J Forensic Sci 2005 50 : 1154 63.
46. Murray EA, Anderson BE. Forensic anthropology in the courtroom: trends in testimony. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences 2007 Feb 21-24 San Antonio, TX. Colorado Springs, CO : American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2007 322 3.
47. Yezerinac SM, Lougheed SC, Handford P. Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Syst Biol 1992 41 : 471 82.
48. Walker PL. Problems of preservation and sexism in sexing: some lessons from historical collections for palaeodemographers. In : Saunders SR, Herring A, editors. Grave reflections: portraying the past through cemetery studies. Toronto : Canadian Scholars Press, 1995 31 47.
49. Walker PL. Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005 127 : 385 91.
50. Symes SA, Rainwater CW, Myster SM. Standardizing saw and knife mark analysis on bone. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 2007 Feb 21-24. San Antonio, TX. Colorado Springs, CO : American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2007 336.
51. Komar D, Lathrop S. Frequencies of morphological characteristics in two contemporary forensic collections: implications for identification. J Forensic Sci 2006 51 : 974 8.
52. Henssge C, Madea B. Estimation of the time since death in the early postmortem period. Forensic Sci Int 2004 144 : 167 75.
53. Madea B. Is there recent progress in the estimation of the postmortem interval by means of thanatochemistry? Forensic Sci Int 2005 151 : 139 49.
54. Mall G, Eckl M, Sinicina I, Peschel O, Hubig M. Temperature-based death time estimation with only partially known environmental conditions. Int J Legal Med 2005 119 (4 185 94.
55. Marshall TK, Hoare I III. The use of the body temperature in estimating the time of death. J Forensic Sci 1962 7 : 211 21.
56. Madea B, Hermann N, Henssge C. Precision of estimating the time since death by vitreous potassium-comparison of two different equations. Forensic Sci Int 1990 46 : 277 84.
57. Madea B, Krompecher T, Knight B, Nokes L. Muscle and tissue changes after death. In : Knight B, editor. The estimation of time since death in the early postmortem period. Arnold : London, 2002 134 209.
58. Rodriguez WC, Bass WM. Insect activity and its relationship to decay rates in human cadavers in East Tennessee. J Forensic Sci 1983 28 : 423 32.
59. Rodriguez WC, Bass WM. Decomposition of buried bodies and methods that may aid in their location. J Forensic Sci 1985 30 : 836 52.
60. Micozzi MS. Experimental study of postmortem change under field conditions: effects of freezing, thawing, and mechanical injury. J Forensic Sci 1986 31 : 953 65.
61. Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones Am, Henry TE, Parks BO. Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. J Forensic Sci 1989 34 : 607 16.
62. Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadows L. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci 1990 35 : 103 11.
63. Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Method and theory of forensic taphonomy research. In : Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1997 13 26.
64. Komar DA. Decay rates in a cold climate region: a review of cases involving advanced decomposition from the Medical Examiner's Office in Edmonton, Alberta. J Forensic Sci 1998 43 : 57 61.
65. Clark MA, Worrell MB, Pless JE. Postmortem changes in soft tissues. In : Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1997 151 64.
66. Gill-King H. Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. In : Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1997 93 108.
67. Castellano MA, Villaneuva EC, von Frenckel R. Estimating the date of bone remains: a multivariate study. J Forensic Sci 2000 29 : 527 34.
68. MacLaughlin-Black SM, Herd RJM, Wilson K, Myers M, West IE. Strontium-90 as an indicator of time since death: a pilot investigation. Forensic Sci Int 1992 57 : 51 66.
69. Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt JD, Foss JE, Ammons JT. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solutions. J Forensic Sci 1992 37 : 1236 53.
70. Benecke M. A brief history of forensic entomology. Forensic Sci Int 1992 120 : 2 14.
71. Haskell NH, Hall RD, Cervenka VJ, Clark MA. On the body: insects' life stage presence and their postmortem artifacts. In : Haglund WD, Sorg MH, editors. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1997 415 48.
72. Lynch MM, Cole S. Science and technology studies on trial: dilemmas of expertise. Soc Stud Sci 2005 35 : 269 311.
73. United States v. Llera Plaza, 179 F. Supp. 2d 492 (E.D. Pa. 2002).
74. United States v. Llera Plaza, 188 F. Supp. 2d 549 (E.D. Pa. 2002).