Comparison of operative time and accuracy using conventional fixed navigation cutting blocks and adjustable Pivotal™ cutting blocks

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 225-232

  Klima, Stefan ^a   Zeh, Alexander ^b   Josten, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cutting block; Navigation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 47249158512     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929080802268531     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87(7):645-652.
2. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001;139(2):109-116.
3. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75(4):464-470.
4. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85(6):830-835.
5. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;232:168-173.
6. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73(5):709-714.
7. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;299:153-156.
8. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Perlick C, Lüring C, Grifka J. Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125(1):16-20.
9. Clemens U, Konermann WH, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Jenny JY, Mielke RK. Computer-assisted navigation with the OrthoPilot system using the Search evolution TKR prosthesis. Results of a multi-centre study. In: Stiehl JB, Konemann WH, Haaker RG, editors. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin: Springer; 2003. pp 234-241.
10. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated total knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 2003;106(11):941-948.
11. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87(1):18-28.