Modeling Homophily Over Time With an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1028-1039

  Popp, Danielle ^a   Laursen, Brett ^a   Kerr, Margaret ^b   Stattin, Håkan ^b   Burk, William J ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

actor partner interdependence model; friendship formation; homophily; nonindependence

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL INTOXICATION; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIALIZATION; SOCIOMETRIC STATUS; SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SOCIAL FACILITATION; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIALIZATION; SOCIOMETRIC TECHNIQUES; SWEDEN;

EID: 47249131772     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1028     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams R.E., Bukowski W.M., and Bagwell C. Stability of aggression during early adolescence as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend's aggression. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29 (2005) 139-145
2. Arbuckle J.L. Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer program] (2006), SPSS, Chicago
3. Berndt T.J., and Keefe K. Friends' influence on adolescents' adjustment to school. Child Development 66 (1995) 1312-1329
4. Cairns R.B., and Cairns B.D. Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time (1994), Cambridge University Press, New York
5. Card, N. A., Little, T. D., & Selig, J. P. (Eds.). (in press). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cillessen A.H.N., Jian X.L., West T.V., and Laszkowski D.K. Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29 (2005) 165-172
7. Collins B., and Laursen W.A. Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin 115 (2004) 197-209
8. Cook W.L., and Kenny D.A. The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29 (2005) 101-109
9. Dishion T.J., McCord J., and Poulin F. When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 1-10
10. Heckman J.J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1979) 153-161
11. Jaccard J., Blanton H., and Dodge T. Peer influences on risky behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology 41 (2005) 135-147
12. Kandel D.B. Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978) 427-436
13. Kashy D.A., and Kenny D.A. The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In: Reis H.T., and Judd C.M. (Eds). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York 451-477
14. Kenny D.A. The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships 2 (1995) 65-75
15. Kenny D.A., and Cook W. Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships 6 (1999) 433-448
16. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., and Cook W. Dyadic data analysis (2006), Guilford Press, New York
17. Kiesner J., Kerr M., and Stattin H. "Very important persons" in adolescence: Going beyond in-school, single friendships in the study of peer homophily. Journal of Adolescence 27 (2004) 545-560
18. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. (2005), Guilford Press, New York
19. Laursen B. Dyadic and group perspectives on close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29 2 (2005) 97-100
20. Laursen, B., Popp, D., Burke, W. J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (in press). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and homogeneity. In N. A. Card, T. D. Little, & J. P. Selig (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Lazarsfeld P.F., and Merton R.K. Friendship as a social process. In: Berger M., Abel T., and Page C.H. (Eds). Freedom and control in modern society (1954), Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ 18-66
22. McKnight P.E., McKnight K.M., Sidani S., and Figueredo A. Missing data: A gentle introduction (2007), Guilford Press, New York
23. Moffitt T.E. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 674-701
24. Neyer F.J. The dyadic interdependence of attachment security and dependency: A conceptual replication across older twin pairs and younger couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19 (2002) 483-503
25. Olsen J.A., and Kenny D.A. Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods 11 (2006) 1-15
26. Persson A., Kerr M., and Stattin H. Staying in or moving away from structured activities: Explanations involving parents and peers. Developmental Psychology 43 (2007) 97-107
27. Steglich C.E.G., Snijders T.A.B., and West P. Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology 2 (2006) 48-56
28. Urberg K.A., Deĝirmencioĝlu S.M., and Pilgrim C. Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology 33 (1997) 834-844