Traveling with MI education in a turbulent sea: Stories of South Korea

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 389-405

  Kim, Myung Hee ^a   Cha, Kyung Hee ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249121236     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390701701386     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Cha, K.H. 2005. A qualitative case study of the Multiple Intelligences into the elementary schools. Unpublished dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
2. Cho, H.S. 2002. Improving creative thinking through integrated instruction applied on Multiple Intelligences theory. Research Report of Schooling, Ministry of Education & Human Resource Development, 1-123.
3. Cho, S.O. 1999. The degrees of Multiple Intelligences, creativity, and academic abilities: The distinction of sex of elementary school children. Unpublished thesis, Chinju National University of Education, Chinju, Korea.
4. Choi, J.M. 2001. The relationship of Multiple Intelligences theory, creativity, and academic abilities. Unpublished thesis, Korea National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.
5. Chon, J.I. 1992. The effects of large and small learning groups on learning attitude and academic self-concept, unpublished thesis, Korean National University of Education.
6. Chun, K.H. 2001. A study on an application of Art Projects on Multiple Intelligences to growth of spatial intelligence for elementary school students. Unpublished thesis, Busan National University of Education, Busan, Korea.
7. Go, E.M. 2005. The relationship among Multiple Intelligences, creativity and self-concept of he elementary school students. Unpublished thesis, Wonkwang University of Education, Iksan, Korea.
8. Ha, D.H. 1998. Applying H. Gardner's multiple intelligences theory to education practice. Journal of Educational Philosophy 12, no. 1: 73-100.
9. Hong, E.S. 2002. A study of the implications of Gardner's 'Multiple Intelligences Theory' and 'Teaching for Understanding Theory' on knowledge education, The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education 28, 249-269.
10. Hong, S.W., and Seo, K.W. 2004. The effect of teaching-learning activities in psychical education using predominant intelligence based, on the Multiple Intelligences. Dague University of Education, Thesis Collection 39.
11. Im, C.S., and Wang, K.S. 2001. Effects of the science project activities based on. Multiple Intelligences on the elementary school, children's problem solving behaviors, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 21, no. 1: 13-21.
12. Jung, T.H. 1998. The analysis of teaching-learning activities based on Multiple Intelligences: Focused on Personal Intelligences. Unpublished dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
13. Kim, C.I. 2002. Creativity and curriculum, curriculum: theory and practice Seoul: Kyoyook Publishing Company.
14. Kim, H.J. 1998. A validation study of multiple intelligences measurement. Unpublished thesis, Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea.
15. Kim, J.H. 2004. The effects of a teaching strategy based on the Multiple Intelligences theory on children's creativity. Chinju National University of Education, Chinju, Korea.
16. Kim, M.H. 1999. Integrating curriculum with Multiple Intelligences in Korean elementary schools. Korea Research Foundation, Research Paper 1-235.
17. _. 2000. Multiple Intelligences theory and school reform, Hangookilbo 14.
18. Kim, M.H., and Kim, Y.B. 1996. The analysis based on Multiple Intelligences theory for middle school students, Hanyang University, Journal of Educational Research 12, 56-72.
19. Kim, M.H., Shin, W.S., and Ju, E.H. 2001. Development of teaching-learning assessment tools based on Project Spectrum, Journal of Early Education 21, no. 4: 127-155.
20. Kim, S.B. 2004. The effects and development of environment teaching-learning program based on Multiple Intelligences theory. Unpublished dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
21. Kim, S.H. 2005. The effect of the Multiple Intelligences theory based instruction on the linguistic ability of underachievers. Unpublished thesis, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu, Korea.
22. Lee, S.H. 2002. The effect of the Multiple Intelligences theory-based instruction on the academic achievement and attitude. Unpublished thesis, Daegu. National University of Education, Daegu, Korea.
23. Lee, Y.G., and Im, C.S. 2001. Effects of in-depth science learning through Multiple Intelligences activities and the science inquiry abilities and interests of elementary school children, Journal of Elementary Science Education 20, no. 2: 239-254.
24. Lee, Y.M. 1997. A study on Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and the construction for the integrated unit for the elementary school students. Journal of Elementary Education Studies 11: 157-184.
25. _. 1997. Multiple intelligences theory and elementary integrated curriculum, Journal of Elementary Education Studies 11: 257-276.
26. _. 2004. The effects of teaching strategies for matching and stretching of Multiple Intelligences, Journal of Elementary Education 17, no. 1:25-46.
27. Min, CG. 2003. The effect of teaching and learning activities based on Multiple Intelligence theory on children's creativity. Unpublished thesis, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu, Korea.
28. Park, B.G. 2003. A comparative analysis on the Multiple Intelligences of academically superior students and academically inferior students. Unpublished thesis, Incheon National University of Education, Incheon, Korea.
29. Park, H.S., and Ji, S.A. 2004. The development and effects of a children's Multiple Intelligences program based on Project Spectrum, Journal of Early-childhood Education 24, no. 6: 155-172.
30. Ryu, Y.Y., and Kim, M.H. 1999. Multiple Intelligences theory and curriculum development, Journal of Curriculum Studies 17, no. 2: 122-150.
31. Shin, M.H. 2000. A study of instructional model through Multiple Intelligences, Journal of Educa-tional Research 38, no. 4: 1-23.
32. Son, S.J. 2006. The effects of creativity improvement on instruction based on Multiple Intelligences theory: focused elementary school students. Unpublished thesis, Dague National University of Education, Daegu, Korea.
33. Yang, O.S., Shin, U.S., Lee, K.O., Whang, H.K., and Kim, S.O. 2004. A study on the structure of children's Multiple Intelligences evaluation instrument (MIDAS-MYC) by teacher's evaluation, Journal of Child Studies 25, no. 4: 115-128.
34. Yuk, M.S. 2001. The effects of integrated curriculum, based on Multiple Intelligences theory on elementary school children's multiple intelligence development. Unpublished thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheong Won, Korea.
35. Armstrong, T. 1994. Multiple Intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
36. Blythe, T., and Gardner, H. 1990. A school for all intelligences, Educational Leadership 48, no. 1: 33-37.
37. Campbell, L., and Campbell, B. 1999. Multiple Intelligences and student achievement: success stories from six schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
38. Campbell, L., Campbell, B., and Dickinson, D. 2004. Teaching and learning through Multiple Intelligences, 3rd edn. London: Pearson Education.
39. Cohen, L. 1995. A classroom for every child, Early Childhood Today 10, no. 1: 35-40.
40. Connelly, F.M., and Clandinin, D.J. 2000. Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Crabtree, B.F., and Miller, W.L. 1999. Doing qualitative research: research methods for primary care London: Sage Publications.
42. Cuban, L. 2004. Assessing the 20-year impact of Multiple Intelligences on schooling, Teachers College Record 106, no. 1: 140-146.
43. Emig, V.B. 1997. A Multiple Intelligences inventory, Educational Leadership 55, no. 1: 47-50.
44. Gardner, H. 1997. Multiple Intelligences as a partner in school improvement, Educational Leadership 55, no. 1:20-21.
45. _. 1999a. Understanding the theory of Multiple Intelligences, Scholastics Early Childhood Today 13, no. 4: 43-45.
46. _. 1999b. Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
47. _. 1999c. The disciplined mind: beyond facts and standardized tests, the K-12 education that every child deserves. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48. _. 2004. The unschooled mind: how children think and how schools should teach, 10th edn. New York: Basic Books.
49. _. 2006. Multiple Intelligences: new horizons. New York: Basic Books.
50. Ha, D.H. 1998. Applying H. Gardner's multiple intelligences theory to education practice. Journal of Educational Psychology 12, no. 1: 73-100.
51. Harley, M.H. 2004. Learner-centered instruction and the theory of Multiple Intelligences with second, language learners, Teachers College Record 106, no. 1: 163-180.
52. Harper, S. 1997. Attitudes toward, a Multiple Intelligences curriculum, Journal of Educational Research, November, 115-122.
53. Hatch, T. 1997. Getting specific about Multiple Intelligences, Educational Leadership 54, no. 6: 26-29.
54. Hoerr, T.R. 1994. How the New City School approaches the Multiple Intelligences, Educational Leadership 52, no. 3: 29-33.
55. _. 2001. Becoming a Multiple Intelligences school. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
56. _. 2003. It's no fad: fifteen years of implementing Multiple Intelligences, Educational Horizons Winter: 92-94.
57. Kliebard, H. 1987. The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958. London: Routledge.
58. Kornhaber, M.L., Fierros, E.G., and Veenema, S.A. 2004. Multiple Intelligences: best ideas form research and practice. London: Pearson Education.
59. Lambert, W.E. 1997. From crockek to tubman. Educational Leadership 55, no. 1: 51-57.
60. Lather, P. 1991. Getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. London: Routledge.
61. Lee, Y.M. 1997. A study on Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and the construction for the integrated unit for the elementary school students. Journal of Elementary Education 11, no. 1: 157-184.
62. Marsh, C. 1992. Key concepts for understanding curriculum. London: Falmer Press.
63. Merriam, S.B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., and Gardner, H. 2006. Orchestrating multiple intelligences, Educational Leadership 64, no. 1: 22-27.
65. NEA 1996. Multiple Intelligences: NEA teacher-to-teacher books. NEA Teacher-to-Teacher Series. Washington, DC: NEA.
66. Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., and Taubman, P. 1995. Understanding curriculum: an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
67. Shearer, B. 1996. The MIDAS: multiple intelligences developments assessment scales. A. guide to assessment and education for the multiple intelligences. Columbus, OH: Original work. Available from the author, DePeyster, St. Kent, OH 44240.
68. Stake, R. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69. Teele, S. 1995. The Multiple Intelligences schools: a plan for all students to succeed. Redlands, CA: Citrograph.
70. Tomlinson, C.A. 2001. How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms, 2nd edn. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
71. Wu, W.T. 2004. Multiple Intelligences, educational reform, and a successful career, Teachers College Record, 106, no. 1: 81-192.