Making a difference? Evaluating an innovative approach to the project management Centre of Excellence in a UK government department

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 556-565

  O'Leary, Tim ^a   Williams, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Best practice; Centre of Excellence; Project intervention; Project management; Project success

Indexed keywords

MANAGERS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

BEST PRACTICES; CASE STUDIES; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; CONTROL PROCESSING; DIRECT IMPACT; ELSEVIER (CO); GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; PROCESS IMPLEMENTATION; PROGRAMME (PROJECT) MANAGEMENT; PROJECT DELIVERY; PROJECT PERFORMANCE;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 47249113831     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Office of Public Services Reform, Improving Project and Programme Delivery: Increasing the Civil Service's Capacity and Capability to Deliver, Cabinet Office. The Stationery Office; 2003.
2. Office of Government Commerce. Centres of Excellence for Project and Programme Management: CoE Information Pack V3.1; 2004 [cited 21/06/07]. Available from: .
3. Hodgson D. Disciplining the professional: the case of project management. J Manage Studies 39 6 (2002) 803-821
4. In: Hodgson D., and Cicmil S. (Eds). Making projects critical. Management work and organisations (2006), Palgrave, London
5. Brown J.S., and Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci 2 1 (1991) 40-57
6. Introna L.D., and Whitley E.A. Against method-ism: exploring the limits of method. Inform Technol People 10 1 (1997) 31-45
7. Truex D., Baskerville R., and Travis J. Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods. Account Manage Inform Technol 10 (2000) 53-79
8. Fitzgerald B. The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study. Inform Syst J 7 (1997) 201-212
9. Nandhakumar J., and Avison D. The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development. Inform Technol People 12 2 (1999) 176-191
10. White D., and Fortune J. Current practice in project management - an empirical study. Int J Project Manage 20 1 (2002) 11
11. Robey D., and Markus M.L. Rituals in information system design. MIS Quarter 8 1 (1984) 5-15
12. Wastell D.G. The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence. Inform Syst J 6 1 (1996) 25-40
13. Cicmil S., et al. Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int J Project Manage (2006) 24
14. Williams T. Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transact Eng Manage 52 4 (2005) 497-508
15. Atkinson R., Crawford L., and Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int J Project Manage 24 8 (2006) 687-698
16. Meyer A.D., Loch C.H., and Rich M.T. Managing project uncertainty: from variation to Chaos. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 43 2 (2002) 60-67
17. Thomas JL, Tjader J. On learning and control - competing paradigms or co-existing requirements for managing projects in ambiguous situations?, in IRNOP, Sydney, Australia; 2000.
18. Crawford L, Pollock J, Costello K. Hard and soft projects in the NSW public sector in 11th annual ANZSYS conference: managing the complex V, Christchurch, New Zealand; 2005.
19. Koskela L, Howell G. The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. In: PMI research conference, Seattle, WA; 2002.
20. Pollack J. The changing paradigms of project management. Int J Project Manage 25 3 (2007) 266-274
21. Soderlund J. Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future. Int J Project Manage 22 3 (2004) 183-191
22. Shenhar A.J. One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Manage Sci 47 3 (2001) 394-414
23. In: Currie W.L., and Galliers R. (Eds). Rethinking management information systems: an interdisciplinary perspective (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
24. Doherty N.F., and King M. The importance of organisational issues in systems development. Inform Technol People 11 2 (1998) 104-123
25. In: Galliers R.D., and Baets W.R.J. (Eds). Information technology and organizational transformation innovation: for the 21st century organization Wiley series in information systems (1998), Wiley, Chichester, England
26. Walsham G. Interpreting information systems in organizations (1993), John & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA
27. Markus ML, Tanis C. The enterprise systems experience - from adoption to success, in Framing the domains of IT research: glimpsing the future through the past, R.W. Zmud, editor. Pinnaflex Educational Resources; 2000. p. 173-207.
28. Ward J., Hemingway C., and Daniel E. A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation. J Strateg Inform Syst 14 2 (2005) 97-119
29. Mintzberg H., and Westley F. Decision making: it's not what you think. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 42 3 (2001) 89-93
30. Zey M. Decision making: alternatives to rational choice models (1992), Springer
31. March J.G. Decisions and organizations (1988), Blackwell, New York, NY
32. Bryman A. Organization studies and the concept of rationality. J Manage Studies 21 4 (1984) 391-408
33. Bresnen M. Conflicting and conflated discourses? Project management, organisational change and learning. In: Hodgson D., and Cicmil S. (Eds). Making projects critical (2006), Palgrave, London
34. Burnes B. Managing change: a strategic approach to organisational dynamics. 4th ed. (2004), Prentice Hall
35. Kanter R.M., Stein B.A., and Jick T.D. The challenge of organizational change: how companies experience it and leaders guide it (1992), Maxwell Macmillan International
36. Kotter J.P. Leading Change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review on Change (1995), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA
37. Stacey R. Strategic management and organisational dynamics: the challenge of complexity. (2002)
38. Weick K.E. Sensemaking in organizations (1995), Sage, London
39. Dawson P. Organizational change: a processual approach (1994), Paul Chapman
40. Burnes B. Complexity theories and organizational change. Int J Manage Rev 7 2 (2005) 73-90
41. Morel B., and Ramanujam R. Through the looking glass of complexity: the dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organ Sci 10 3 (1999) 278-293
42. Brown S.L., and Eisenhardt K.M. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrat Sci Quarter 42 1 (1997) 1-34
43. Ciborra C. A theory of information system based on improvisation. In: Curry W.L., and Galliers R. (Eds). Rethinking management information systems an interdisciplinary perspective (1999), Oxford University Press
44. Lewis M., et al. Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad Manage J 3 (2002)
45. Orlikowski W. Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inform Syst Res 7 1 (1996) 63-92
46. Weick K.E. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ Sci 9 5 (1998)
47. Ivory C., and Alderman N. Can project management learn anything from studies of failure in complex systems?. Project Manage J 36 3 (2005) 5-16
48. Buchanan D., and Badham R. Power, politics, and organizational change: winning the turf game (1999), SAGE Publications Ltd.
49. Introna L.D. Management, information, and power (1997), Macmillan Press
50. Boddy D., and Buchanan D. Take the lead: interpersonal skills for project managers (1992), Prentice-Hall, London
51. Cicmil S. Understanding project management practice through interpretative and critical research perspectives. Project Manage J 37 2 (2006) 27-37
52. Crawford L., et al. Practitioner development: from trained technicians to reflective practitioners. Int J Project Manage 24 8 (2006) 722-733
53. Schön D.A. The reflective practitioner (1983), Basic Books
54. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation (1991), Cambridge University Press
55. Newell S., et al. 'Best practice' development and transfer in the NHS: the importance of process as well as product knowledge. Health Serv Manage Res 16 (2003) 1-12
56. Sturdy A. The adoption of management ideas and practices: theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Manage Learn 35 2 (2004) 155-179
57. Jugdev K., and Muller R. A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Manage J 36 4 (2005) 19-31
58. Lim C.S., and Mohamed M.Z. Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int J Project Manage 17 4 (1999) 243-248
59. Cooke-Davies T. The "real" success factors on projects. Int J Project Manage 20 3 (2002) 185-190
60. Sauer C. Why information systems fail: a case study approach. Inform Syst Series (1993), Blackwell Science Ltd.
61. Wateridge J. How can IS/IT projects be measured for success?. Int J Project Manage 16 1 (1998) 59-63
62. Boddy D., and Paton R. Responding to competing narratives: lessons for project managers. Int J Project Manage 22 3 (2004) 225-233
63. Engwall M. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Res Policy 32 5 (2003) 789-808
64. Fincham R. Narratives of success and failure in systems development. Br J Manage 13 (2002) 1-14
65. Wilson M., and Howcroft D. Re-conceptualising failure: social shaping meets IS research. Europe J Inform Sys 11 4 (2002)
66. National Audit Office, Delivering successful IT-enabled business change. London: The Stationery Office; 2006.