Modeling semantic and structural knowledge in Web navigation

Discourse Processes

Volumn 45, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 346-364

  Juvina, Ion ^a   Van Oostendorp, Herre ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249109050     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802145205     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
2. Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In D. Wixon (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2002 (pp. 463-470). Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press.
3. Brumby, D. P. (2004). A model of single-page Web-search: The effect of interdependence on link assessment. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 402-403). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Card, S. K., Pirolli, P., Van der Wege, M., Morrison, J. B., Reeder, R. W., Schraedley, P. K., et al. (2001). Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In D. Wixon (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2001 (pp. 498-505). New York: ACM Press.
5. Chen, C. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 529-542.
6. Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2001). What do Web users do? An empirical analysis of Web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 903-922.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8. Czerwinski, M., van Dantzich, M., Robertson, G. G., & Hoffman, H. (1999). The contribution of thumbnail image, mouse-over text and spatial location memory to Web page retrieval in 3D. In M. A. Sasse and C. Johnson (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT '99 (pp. 163-170). Edinburgh, England: IOS Press.
9. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
10. Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., & Elgin, P. D. (2002). Users' schemata of hypermedia: What is so "spatial" about a Website? Interacting With Computers, 14, 487-502.
11. Gugerty, L., Treadaway, C., & Rubinstein, J. S. (2006). Individual differences in Internet search outcomes and processes. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2006 (pp. 815-820). New York: ACM Press.
12. Howes, A., Payne, S. J., & Richardson, J. (2002). An instance-based model of the effect of previous choices on the control of interactive search. In W. D. Gray and D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 476-481). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Juvina, I. (2006). Development of a cognitive model for navigating on the Web. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
14. Juvina, I., & van Oostendorp, H. (2005). Cognitive model working alongside the user. In T. McEwan, J. Guliksen, and D. Benyon (Eds.), People and Computers XIX-The bigger picture. Human Computer Interaction 2005 (pp. 409-420). London: Springer.
15. Juvina, I., & van Oostendorp, H. (2006a). Enhancing Internet experienceof visually impaired persons by means of dynamic highlighting and selective reading. Information Design Journal, 14, 71-81.
16. Juvina, I., & van Oostendorp, H. (2006b). Individual differences and behavioral metrics involved in modeling Web navigation. Universal Access in Information Society, 4, 258-269.
17. Juvina, I., van Oostendorp, H., Karbor, P., & Pauw, B. (2005). Toward modeling contextual information in Web navigation. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalon, and M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), 27th meeting of the Cognitive Society (pp. 1078-1083). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39, 125-129.
20. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., & Polson, P. G. (2000). A comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to Web usability analysis. In S. McDonald, Y. Waern, and G. Cockton (Eds.), People and computers XIV (pp. 357-373). New York: Springer.
21. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
22. Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse Processes, 34, 259-280.
23. Miller, C. S., & Remington, R. W. (2002). Effects of structure and label ambiguity on information navigation. In D. Wixon (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2002 (pp. 630-631). New York: ACM Press.
24. Morrison, J. B., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (2001). A taxonomic analysis of what World Wide Web activities significantly impact people's decisions and actions. In J. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on the human factors in computing systems 2001 (pp. 163-164). New York: ACM Press.
25. Neerincx, M. A., Pemberton, S., & Lindenberg, J. (1999). U-WISH Web usability: Methods, guidelines and support interfaces. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
26. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643-675.
27. Pirolli, P., & Fu, W.-T. (2003). SNIF-ACT: A model of information foraging on the World Wide Web. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Corbett, and F. de Rosis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on User Modeling (pp. 45-54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Rauterberg, M. (1996). How to measure cognitive complexity in human-computer interaction. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems 1996. Proceedings of the 13th European meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (pp. 815-820). Vienna, Austria: Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies.
29. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
30. Tamborello, F. P. I., & Byrne, M. D. (2005). Information search: The intersection of visual and semantic space. In W. Kellogg, S. Zhai, G. van der Veer, and C. Gale (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on the human factors in computing systems 2005 (pp. 1821-1824). New York: ACM Press.
31. Tavanti, M., & Lind, M. (2001). 2D vs. 3D. Implications on spatial memory. In K. Andrews, S. Roth, and P. Chung Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of IEEE's annual conference on Information Visualization (pp. 139-148). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
32. Tucker, P., & Warr, P. (1996). Intelligence, elementary cognitive components, and cognitive styles as predictors of complex task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 91-102.
33. Wen, J. (2003). Post-valued recall Web pages: User disorientation hits the big time. IT & Society, 1, 184-194.