Individual differences and behavioral metrics involved in modeling web navigation

Universal Access in the Information Society

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 258-269

  Juvina, Ion ^a   van Oostendorp, Herre ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Navigation metrics; Web navigation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644527566     PISSN: 16155289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-005-0007-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lazar J (2003) The World Wide Web. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 714-730
2. Ivory M, Hearst M (2001) State of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput Surveys 33(4):1-47
3. Conklin J (1987) Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Comput Mag 20(9):17-41
4. Eveland WP Jr, Dunwoody S (1998) Users and navigation patterns of a science World Wide Web site for the public. Public Understand Sci 7:285-311
5. MacGregor S (1999) Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. J Educ Comput Res 20(2):189-206
6. Draper SW (1999) Supporting use, learning, and education. J comput documen 23(2):19-24
7. Chen C (2001) Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. J Am Soc Inform Sci 51(6):529-542
8. Stanney KM, Salvendy G (1995) Information visualization; assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators. Ergonomics 38(6):1184-1198
9. Westerman SJ (1995) Computerized information retrieval: Individual differences in the use of spatial vs nonspatial navigational information. Perceptual Motor Skills 81:771-786
10. Sjolinder M (1998) Individual differences in spatial cognition and hypermedia navigation. In: Towards a framework for design and evaluation of navigation in electronic spaces. Swedish Institute of Computer Science
11. Neerincx MA, Pemberton S, Lindenberg J (1999) U-WISH Web usability: methods, guidelines and support interfaces. TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg
12. Pirolli P, Fu WT (2003) SNIF-ACT: A model of information foraging on the World Wide Web http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/pirolli03snifact.html
13. Byrne MD (2003) Cognitive Architecture. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 97-117
14. Card SK, Pirolli P, Van Der Wege M, Morrison JB, Reeder RW, Schraedley PK, Boshart J (2001) Information scent as a driver of web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for web usability. SIGCHI'01. ACM Seattle
15. Kieras DE, Meyer DE (1997) An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 12:391-438
16. Kitajima M, Blackmon MH, Polson PG (2000) A comprehension-based model of web navigation and its application to web usability analysis, in people and computers XIV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357-373
17. Landauer TK, Foltz PW, Laham D (1998) Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process 25:259-284
18. Blackmon MH et al (2002) Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In: CHI 2002. ACM, Minneapolis
19. Jameson A (2003) Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 305-330
20. van Oostendorp H, Goldman SR (eds) (1999) The construction of mental representations during reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah
21. van Dijk TA, Kintsch W 1983 Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic, New York
22. Morrison JB, Pirolli P, Card SK (2000) A taxonomic analysis of what World Wide Web activities significantly impact people's decisions and actions. UIR Technical report UIR-R-2000-17, Xerox PARC
23. Pirolli P, Card SK (1999) Information foraging. Psychological Rev 106(4):643-675
24. ISO 9241 - 11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with VDT's - Guidance on usability
25. Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge university press, Cambridge
26. van Oostendorp H, Walbeehm BJ (1995) Towards modelling exploratory learning in the context of direct manipulation interfaces. Interact Comput 7(1):3-24
27. Herder E, Van Dijk B (2004) Site structure and user navigation: Models, measures and methods. In: Chen SY, Magoulas GD (eds) Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems. Idea Group Publishing, pp 19-34
28. Botafogo RA, Rivlin E, Shneiderman B (1992) Structural analysis of hypertexts: Identifying hierarchies and useful metrics. ACM Trans Inform Syst 10(2):142-180
29. Hilgard ER (1980) The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. J Histo Behav Sci 16:107-117
30. Atman KS (1982) The conation phenomenon. University of Pittsburgh School of Education, Pittsburgh
31. Hershberger WAE (1989) Volitional action: Conation and control. Advances in Psychology, vol 62. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
32. Wechsler D (1950) Cognitive, conative, and non-intellective intelligence. Am Psychol 5:78-83
33. Emmons R (1986) Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. J Personal Soc Psychol 51:1058-1068
34. Mischel W (1996) From good intentions to willpower. In: Gollwitzer P, Bargh J (eds) The psychology of action. Guilford press, New York, pp 197-218
35. Huitt W (1999) Conation as an important factor of mind. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta State University, Valdosta
36. Linderholm T (2002) Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discour Process 34(3):259-280
37. Pettijohn T (2002) Locus of control scale. Web Survey
38. Peak Performance, Brain Dominance Questionnaire (2002) http://www.glencoe.com/ps/peak/selfassess/integrate/
39. Egger FN (2003) From interactions to tranzactions: Designing the trust experience for business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
40. Miron EAM (2003) Analyzing the role of students' goal orientation during their interaction with an ILE. In: HCT2003-the 7th human centred technology postgraduate workshop. HCT, Falmer, Brighton
41. Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart 19(2):189
42. Wammi, Web Usability Questionnaire. http://www.wammi.com/
43. Sumi, The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/sumi/
44. Ahuja JS, Webster J (2001) Perceived disorientation: An examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interact Comput 14(1):15-29
45. Cohen J (19992) A power primer. Psycholo Bull 112(1):155-159
46. Cockburn A, McKenzie B (2001) What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use. Int J Hum Comput Stud 54(6):903-922
47. Rouet JF, Ros C, Jegou G, Metta S (2003) Locating relevant categories in web menues: Effects of menu structure, aging and task complexity, in human-centred computing. Cognitive, Social and Ergonomic Aspects. In: Harris D, Duffy V, Smith M, Stephanidis C (eds) HCI International 2003-Conference Proceedings. Crete, Greece, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, pp 547-551
48. Juvina I, van Oostendorp H (2003) Human Factors in web-assisted personal finance. Human-centred computing. Cognitive, social and ergonomic aspects. In: Harris D, Duffy V, Smith M, Stephanidis C (eds) HCI International 2003-Conference Proceedings. Crete, Greece. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, 3:477-481
49. Takeishi A (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Manage J 22(5):03-433
50. Tucker P, Warr P (1996) Intelligence, elementary cognitive components, and cognitive styles as predictors of complex task performance. Personal Individual Differences 21(1):91-102