A social values analysis of self-other differences in decision making involving risk

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 114-129

  Stone, Eric R ^a   Allgaier, Liz ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249086079     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01973530802208832     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self : Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
2. Aron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (1998). The self-expansion model and motivation. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 22, 1-13.
3. Beisswanger, A. H., Stone, E. R., Hupp, J. M., & Allgaier, L. (2003). Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 121-135.
4. Borresen, C. R. (1987). Decision making as a function of self and others. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1301-1302.
5. Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
6. Bruine de Bruin, W., Downs, J. S., & Fischhoff, B. (2006). Adolescents' thinking about the risks of sexual behaviors. In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 421-439). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Clark, R. D. (1971). Group-induced shift toward risk: A critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 251-270.
8. Cvetkovich, G. (1972). Effects of sex on decision policies used for self and decision policies used for other persons. Psychonomic Science, 26, 319-320.
9. Fagerlin, A., Ditto, P. H., Danks, J. H., Houts, R. M., & Smucker, W. D. (2001). Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments. Health Psychology, 20, 166-175.
10. Hare, J., Pratt, C., & Nelson, C. (1992). Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1049-1054.
11. Hoch, S. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221-234.
12. Hong, L. K. (1978). Risky shift and cautious shift: Some direct evidence on the culture-value theory. Social Psychology, 41, 342-346.
13. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
14. Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-other discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45-53.
15. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
16. Kray, L. J. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106.
17. Kray, L., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I'll do this, you do that. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 207-217.
18. Krishnamurthy, P., & Kumar, P. (2002). Self-other discrepancies in waiting time decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 207-226.
19. Lamm, H., Schaude, E., & Trommsdorff, G. (1971). Risky shift as a function of group members' value of risk and need for approval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 430-435.
20. Levinger, G., & Schneider, D. J. (1969). Test of the "risk is a value" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 165-169.
21. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
22. McCauley, C., Kogan, N., & Teger, A. I. (1971). Order effects in answering risk dilemmas for self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 423-424.
23. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298-305.
24. Muuss, R. E., & Porton, H. D. (1998). Increasing risk behavior among adolescents. In R. E. Muuss & H. D. Porton (Eds.), Adolescent behavior and society: A book of readings (5th ed., pp. 422-431). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Olson, B. D., & Suls, J. (2000). Self-, other-, and ideal-judgments of risk and caution as a function of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 425-436.
26. Powell, P. L., & Johnson, J. E. V. (1995). Gender and DSS design: The research implications. Decision Support Systems, 14, 27-58.
27. Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277.
28. Roszkowski, M. J., & Snelbecker, G. E. (1990). Effects of "framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 237-246.
29. Sabini, J., Cosmas, K., Siepmann, M.,&Stein,J.(1999). Underestimates and truly false consensus effects in estimates of embarrassment and other emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 223-241.
30. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In . P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic.
31. Shapiro, R., Siegel, A. W., Scovill, L. C., & Hays, J. (1998). Risk-taking patterns of female adolescents: what they do and why. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 143-159.
32. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Gutscher, H. (2002). Risk preference predictions and gender stereotypes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 91-102.
33. Slovic, P., Weinstein, M. S., & Lichtenstein, S. (1967). Sex differences in the risks a person selects for himself and the risks he selects for someone else. Oregon Research Institute, 7, 1-13.
34. Stone, E. R., Yates, A., & Caruthers, A. S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1797-1824.
35. Teger, A. I., & Kogan, N. (1975). Decision-making for others under reciprocal and non-reciprocal conditions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 215-222.
36. Teigen, K. H., Olsen, M. V. G., & Solås, O. E. (2005). Giver-receiver asymmetries in gift preferences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 125-144.
37. Vorauer, J. D., & Ratner, R. K. (1996). Who's going to make the first move? Pluralistic ignorance as an impediment to relationship formation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 483-506.
38. Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1964). Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 263-274.
39. Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. (1968). Is risk a value? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 101-106.
40. Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Sokolowska, J. (1998). What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: Cross-cultural comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 170-186.
41. West, P. M. (1996). Predicting preferences: An examination of agent learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 68-80.
42. Wills, C. E., & Moore, C. F. (1996). Perspective-taking judgments of medication acceptance: Inferences from relative importance about the impact and combination of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 251-267.
43. Wray, L. D., & Stone, E. R. (2005). The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 125-144.
44. Zaleska, M., & Kogan, N. (1971). Level of risk selected by individuals and groups when deciding for self and for others. Sociometry, 34, 198-213.