Risk preference predictions and gender stereotypes

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 91-102

  Siegrist, Michael ^a   Cvetkovich, George ^b   Gutscher, Heinz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender stereotypes; Prediction bias; Risk preferences; Risk taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036167408     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2956     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect
2. Why do women invest differently than men?
3. The evolution of a theory of mind
4. Gender differences in risk taking: A Meta-analysis
5. Risk-as-value hypothesis: The relationship between perception of self, others, and the risk shift
6. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research
7. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money of your life?
8. Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference
9. Smoking, seat belts, and other risky consumer decisions: Differences by gender and race
10. A fundamental prediction error: Self-others discrepancies in risk preference
11. Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions
12. Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes
13. Choices, values, and frames
14. Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments
15. Self-image, perception of peers' risk acceptance and risky shift
16. The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risk decision-making task
17. Test of the "Risk as a valu" hypothesis
18. A ratio measure of sex stereotyping
19. Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse?
20. Belief in gene technology: The influence of environmental attitudes and gender
21. Perception of risk
22. Public concern about industrial hazards
23. Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
24. Perceived versus meta-analuytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes
25. Is risk a value?