Density-functional calculations of the adsorption and reaction of acetic acid on Ge(001)

Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Volumn 112, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 6947-6952

  Kim, Hyung Jin ^a   Cho, Jun Hyung ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ADSORPTION; ATOMIC PHYSICS; FORMING; GERMANIUM; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; OLIGOMERS; PH; PH EFFECTS; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SURFACE REACTIONS; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY (ACS); DENSITY FUNCTIONAL CALCULATIONS; ENERGY PROFILING; FIRST-PRINCIPLES; GE ATOM; H-ATOM TRANSFER; LONE PAIRS; MONODENTATE; REACTION PATHWAYS; REPULSIVE INTERACTIONS;

ATOMS;

EID: 47149108286     PISSN: 19327447     EISSN: 19327455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp801666y     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Wolkow, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1999, 50, 413.
2. Bent, S. F. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 879, and references therein.
3. Nishijima, M.; Yoshinobu, J.; Tsuda, H.; Onchi, M. Surf. Sci. 1987, 192, 383.
4. Yoshinobu, J.; Tsuda, H.; Nishijima, M.; Onchi, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 7332.
5. Liu, H.; Hamers, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7593.
6. Hamers, R. J.; Hovis, J. S.; Lee, S.; Liu, H.; Shan, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 1489.
7. Hamaguchi, K.; Machida, S.; Nagao, M.; Yasui, F.; Mukai, K.; Yamashita, Y.; Yoshinobu, J.; Kato, H. S.; Okuyama, H.; Kawai, M.; Sato, T.; Iwatsuki, M. J. Phys. Chem. 2001, 105, 3718.
8. Hovis, J. S.; Hamers, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 9581.
9. Liu, Q;, Hoffmann, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4082.
10. Konečny, R.; Doren, D. J. Surf. Sci. 1998, 169, 417.
11. Choi, C. H.; Gordon, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11311.
12. Sorescu, D. C.; Jordan, K. D. J. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 8259.
13. Cho, J.-H.; Kleinman, L. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 235420;
14. Cho, J.-H.; Kleinman, L. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 075303.
15. Fan, X. L.; Zhang, Y. F.; Lau, W. M.; Liu, Z. F. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 165305.
16. Ikeura-Sekiguchi, H.; Sekiguchi, T. Surf. Sci. 1999, 433-435, 549.
17. Lu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, M. C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 5, 2156.
18. Bitzer, T.; Alkunshalie, T.; Richardson, N. V. Surf. Sci. 1996, 368, 202.
19. Bitzer, T.; Richardson, N. V. Surf. Sci. 1999, 427-428, 369.
20. Lopez, A.; Bitzer, T.; Heller, T.; Richardson, N. V. Surf. Sci. 2001, 480, 65.
21. Hwang, H.-N.; Baik, J.-Y.; An, K.-S.; Lee, S.-S.; Kim, Y.-S.; Hwang, C.-C.; Kim, B.-S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8379.
22. Filler, M. A.; Van, Deventer, J, A.; Keung, A. J.; Bent, S. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 770.
23. Hwang, E.; Kim, D. H.; Hwang, Y. J.; Kim, A.; Hong, S.; Kim, S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (16), 5941;
24. Kim, D. H.; Hwang, E.; Hong, S.; Kim, S. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 3629.
25. Lu, X.; Zhu, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 124.
26. Minary, P.; Tuckerman, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1110.
27. Qu, Y. Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Han, K. L. Surf. Sci. 2004, 569, 12.
28. Chung, O. N.; Kim, H.; Chung, S.; Koo, Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 033303.
29. Lee, J. Y.; Cho, J.-H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 18455.
30. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864.
31. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.
32. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.
33. Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993.
34. Kleinman, L.; Bylander, D. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 1425.
35. Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 7892;
36. Laasonen, K.; Pasquarello, A.; Car, R.; Lee, C.; Vanderbilt, D. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 10142.
37. Cho, J.-H.; Kim, K.; Morikawa, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 024716;
38. Kim, H. J.; Cho, J.-H. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 8222;
39. Cho, J.-H.; Kleinman, L. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 115314.
40. II, and OT structures. However, all structures are found to be non-spin-polarized.
41. Sprik, M.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 1142, and references therein.
42. Chadi, D. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979, 43, 43.
43. Wismer, D. A.; Chattery, R. Introduction to Nonlinear Optimization; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1978; pp 174-178.
44. As for the ground state reconstruction of the Si(001) and Ge(001) surfaces, density functional calculations on slab geometries and large cluster models favor a buckled dimer structure, see: Dabrowski, J.; Scheffler, M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1992, 56, 15;
45. Ramstad, A.; Brocks, G.; Kelly, P. J. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 14504;
46. Konecny, R.; Doren, D. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10983;
47. Yang, C.; Lee, S. Y.; Kang, H. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3295.
48. On the other hand, multiconfiguration self-consistent field and configuration interaction calculations on small clusters find the symmetric dimer structure to have the lowest energy: see Radeke, M. R.; Carter, E. A. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11803;
49. Paulus, B. Surf. Sci. 1998, 408, 195;
50. Shoemarker, J.; Burggraf, L.; Gordon, M. S.; W. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 2994;
51. Gordon, M. S.; Shoemarker, J.; Burggraf, L. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9355.
52. Fukada, Y.; Shigeta, Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 126103.
53. b = 1.13 eV for the diffusion barrier of the dissociated H atom. Using temperature-programmed desorption, Russell and Ekerdt (see Surf. Sci. 1996, 369, 51) estimated that the H diffusion barrier on Ge-covered Si(001) surface is 1.0 eV.