Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 555-580

  Isaacs, Talia ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Higher education; Intelligibility; International teaching assistants; Pronunciation

Indexed keywords

EID: 47149104124     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.64.4.555     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1949). Teaching pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 3, 113-122.
2. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529-555.
3. Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Caldwell, K., & Samuel, C. (2001). A review of the Test of Spoken English (TSE). Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 319-326.
5. Catford, J.C. (1950). Intelligibility. English Language Teaching, 5, 7-15.
6. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cheng, L., Myles, J., & Curtis, A. (2004). Targeting language support for non-native English-speaking graduate students at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 21, 50-71.
8. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Derwing, T.M., & Munro, M.J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four Lis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1-16.
11. Duranti, A. (1986). The audience as co-author: An introduction. Text, 6, 239-247.
12. Educational Testing Service. (1995). Test of Spoken English: Standard-setting manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13. Educational Testing Service. (2001). TSE and SPEAK score user guide. Retrieved February 23, 2008, from http://ftp.ets.org/pub/toefl/ 008659.pdf
14. Fayer, J.M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and normative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37, 313-326.
15. Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399-423.
16. Gass, S., & Varonis, E.M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34, 65-89.
17. Gimson, A.C. (1980). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
18. Hahn, L.D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201-223.
19. Hoekje, B., & Williams, J. (1992). Communicative competence and the dilemma of international teaching assistant education. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 243-269.
20. Isaacs, T. (2006). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English speaking graduate students. Unpublished M.A. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
21. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23, 83-103.
23. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L.B. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
24. Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English pronunciation. London: Longman.
25. Koren, S. (1995). Foreign language pronunciation testing: A new approach. System, 23, 387-400.
26. Lindemann, S. (2002). Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States. Language in Society, 31, 419-441.
27. Lindemann, S. (2006). What the other half gives: The interlocutor's role in nonnative speaker performance. In Rebecca Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 23-49). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23, 163-198.
29. Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.
30. Ludwig, J. (1982). Native speaker judgments of second language learners' efforts at communication: A review. Modern Language Journal, 66, 274-283.
31. Luoma, S. (2001). A review of the Test of Spoken English (TSE). Language Testing, 18, 225-234.
32. Morley, J. (1994). A multidimensional curriculum design for speech-pronunciation instruction. In Joan Morley (Ed.), Pronunciation pedagogy and theory (pp. 64-91). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
33. Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. (1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign accented speech. Language Learning, 48, 159-182.
34. Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285-310.
35. Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451-468.
36. Munro, M.J., Derwing, T.M., & Morton, S.L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111-131.
37. Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 233-255.
38. Porter, D., & Weir, C. (1997). Valid criteria for the assessment of proficiency in pronunciation. Speak Out, 20, 22.
39. Rajadurai, J. (2007). Intelligibility studies: A consideration of empirical and ideological issues. World Englishes, 26, 87-98.
40. Rubin, D.L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of non-native English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33, 511-531.
41. Saif, S. (2002). A needs-based approach to the evaluation of the spoken language ability of international teaching assistants. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 145-167.
42. Saif, S. (2006). Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international teaching assistants. Language Testing, 23, 1-34.
43. Smith, L.E. (1992). Spread of English and issues of intelligibility. In B.B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed., pp. 75-90). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
44. Smith, L.E., & Nelson, C.I. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4, 333-342.
45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Turner, C.E., & Upshur, J.A. (2002). Rating scales derived from student samples: Effects of the scale maker and the student sample on scale content and student scores. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 49-70.
47. Tyler, A. (1992). Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants' spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 713-729.
48. Zielinski, B. (2006). The intelligibility cocktail: An interaction between speaker and listener ingredients. Prospect, 3, 20-43.