Does group discussion of student clerkship performance at an education committee affect an individual committee member's decisions?

Academic Medicine

Volumn 80, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Gaglione, Margaret MacKrell ^a   Moores, Lisa ^b   Pangaro, Louis ^b   Hemmer, Paul A ^b  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 25644461061     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00016     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Parenti CM. A process for identifying marginal performers among students in a clerkship. Acad Med. 1993;68:575-77.
2. Wear D, Keck-McNulty C, Jones B, Penn M, Moss P. Medical students' experience of academic review and promotions committees. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16:226-32.
3. Veninga RL. Meetings that Matter. Health Prog. 1989;11:38-59.
4. Hemmer PA, Pangaro LP. The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying student with marginal funds of knowledge. Acad Med. 1997;72:641-43.
5. Hemmer PA, Pangaro LP. Using formal evaluation sessions for cased-based faculty development during the clinical clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:1216-21.
6. Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson JL, Pangaro L. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:167-73.
7. Roop S, Pangaro L. Measuring the impact of clinical teaching on student performance during a third year medicine clerkship. Am J Med. 2001;110:205-9.
8. Pangaro L, Gibson K, Russel W, Lucas C, Marple R. A prospective, randomized trial of a six-week ambulatory medicine rotation. Acad Med. 1995;70:537-41.
9. Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999;74:1203-7.
10. Durning S, Pangaro L, Denton GD, et al. Intersite consistency as a standard of programmatic evaluation in a clerkship with multiple geographically separated sites. Acad Med. 2003;78(10 suppl):S38.
11. Hemmer PA, Pangaro LN. Natural history of knowledge deficiencies following clerkships. Acad Med. 2002;77:350-53.
12. Lavin B, Pangaro L. Internship ratings as a validity outcome measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performance. Acad Med. 1998;73:998-1002.
13. Harris IB. Qualitative methods. In: International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Norman, Geoffrey R.; van der Vleuten, Gees P.M.; Newble, D.I. (Eds) New York: Springer 2002; 45-95.
14. Hayes GJ. Ethics committees: group process concerns and the need for research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. I995;4:83-91.
15. Kroon MB, van Kreveld D, Rabbie JM. Group versus individual decision making, effects of accountability and gender of groupthink. Small Group Res. 1992;23:427-58.
16. Elam CL, Stratton TD, Scott KL, Wilson JF, Lieber A. Review, deliberation and voting: a study of selection decisions in a medical school admission committee. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:98-103.
17. Shaw M. Overview of Small Group Behavior: University Programs Modular Studies. Morristown, NJ:General Learning Press, 1974:1-34.
18. Hemmer PA. Descriptive evaluation of medical students during clerkships. In: Fincher RM (ed). Handbook for Clerkship Directors. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2000.