Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model

CALICO Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 81-98

  Chang, Mei Mei ^a   Lehman, James D ^b  

^a NATIONAL PINGTUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EFL learners; Instructional strategy; Interactive multimedia; Intrinsic motivation; Relevance enhancement

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070704872     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v20i1.81-98     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Angelis, P., & Henderson, T. (Eds.). (1989). Communicative competence revisited: Selected papers from the proceedings of the BAAL/AAAL joint seminar [Spe-cial issue]. Applied Linguistics, 10.
2. Berns, M. (1990). Contexts of competence: Social and culture consideration in communicative language teaching. New York: Plenum Press.
3. Brown, H. D. (1990). M & Ms for language classroom? Another look at motivation. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 383-393). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4. Brown, H. D. (1993). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language peda-gogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Chanier, T. (1996). Learning a second language for specific purposes within a hypermedia framework. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9 (1), 3-43.
7. Chung, J. (1991). Collaborative learning strategies: The design of instructional environments for the emerging new school. Educational Technology, 31 (12), 15-22.
8. Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.
9. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Dweck, E., & Elliott, G. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, 4 (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley & Sons.
11. Guthrie L. F., & Richardson, S. (1995). Turned on to language arts: Computer literacy in the primary grades. Educational Leadership, 53 (2), 14-17.
12. Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in in-struction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 11-14.
13. Hopkins, K. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2 (4), 26-34.
15. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivation design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instruc-tional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. E. Shaw (Ed.), Aspects of educational technology, XVII: Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.
17. Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 2-10.
18. Keller, J. M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26 (8), 1-7.
19. Keller, J. M. (1990). Motivational tactics checklist. Unpublished materials, Florida State University.
20. Keller, J. M. (1993). Instructional material motivation survey. Unpublished materials, Florida State University.
21. Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. W. (1987). Application of the ARCS model to motivational design. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories (pp. 289-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS model in courseware design. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 401-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Maslow, A. H. (1970). The whole world guide to language learning. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
24. McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., & Lin, Y. (1995). Teaching learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 20, 153-160.
25. Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research & Develop-ment, 45 (1), 5-17.
26. Murray, J. H., Morgenstern, D., & Furstenberg, G. (1991). The Athena language-learning project: Design issues for the next generation of computer-based language-learning tools. In W. F. Smith (Ed.), Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects (pp. 97-118). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
27. Nwagbara, C. (1993). Effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model of motivational design. Unpublished dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
28. Pintrich, P. R. (1989). A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In J. Stark & L. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through research: New direction for instructional research, 57 (pp. 65-79). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
29. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1), 33-40.
30. nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowl-edge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of Learning Science, 1 (1), 37-68.
32. Schunk, D. J. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (pp. 13-44). New York: Academic Press.
33. Snow, R. (1990). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual difference in learning. In P. Ackerman, R. Sternberg., & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 13-59). New York: Freeman.
34. Underwood, J. (1984). Linguistics, computers, and the language teacher: A communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.