University students' approaches to learning: Rethinking the place of technology

Distance Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 141-152

  Goodyear, Peter ^a   Ellis, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Learning outcomes; Student agency

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849115151     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910802154947     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barnes, K., Marateo, R.C., & Ferris, S.P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4).
2. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term. London: Routledge.
5. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
6. Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., di Sessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
8. Cook, T. (2002). Randomized experiments in educational policy research: A critical examination of the reasons the educational evaluation community has offered for not doing them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 175-199.
9. Ehrmann, S. (1998). Asking the right question: What does research tell us about technology and higher learning? Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://www.tltgroup.org/resources/Flashlight/AskingRightQuestion.htm
10. Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Brillant, M., & Prosser, M. (2008). Student experiences of problem-based learning in pharmacy: Conceptions of learning, approaches to learning and the integration of face-to-face and on-line activities. Advances in Health Sciences Education. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/w4q253651l018166/
11. Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., O'Hara, A., & Prosser, M. (2007). The university student experience of faceto-face and online discussions: Coherence, reflection and meaning. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 83-97.
12. Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & Calvo, R. (2008). Engineering students' conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction. 18(3), 267-282.
13. Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O'Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussions: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 244-256.
14. Gibson, J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Goodyear, P. (2006). Technology and the articulation of vocational and academic interests: Reflections on time, space and e-learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 83-98.
16. Hannafin, K., & Hannafin, M. (1996). The ecology of distance learning environments. Training Research Journal, 1, 49-70.
17. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Paper presented at the Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London.
18. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
19. Jochems, W., van Merriënboer, J., & Koper, R. (Eds.). (2004). Integrated e-learning: Pedagogy, technology, and organization. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2007). Student expectations study: Key findings from online research and discussion evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee. London: Author. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/ publications/studentexpectations.aspx
21. Jones, C. (1998). Context, content and cooperation: An ethnographic study of collaborative learning online. Unpublished PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University.
22. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., et al. (2007, December). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2007 Conference - ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning, Singapore.
23. Knight, P. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275-286.
24. Knight, P., & York, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
25. Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
26. Leinhardt, G., & Putnam, R. (1987). The skill of learning through classroom lessons. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 557-587.
27. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (Eds.). (1997). The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
29. Mol, A. (Ed.). (2002a). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. Mol, A. (2002b). Cutting surgeons, walking patients: Some complexities involved in comparing. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 218-257). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can 'blended learning' be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17-26. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/elea/content/pdfs/2/issue2_1.asp
32. Peterson, P., & Swing, S. (1982). Beyond time on task: Students' reports of their thought processes during classroom instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 82(5), 481-491.
33. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
34. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
35. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
36. Richmond, W. (1970). The concept of educational technology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
37. Rohse, S., & Anderson, T. (2006). Design patterns for complex learning. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 82-91.
38. Romiszowski, A. (2004). How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5-27.
39. Selwyn, N. (2003). Why students do (and do not) make use of ICT in university. Paper presented at the Finding Common Ground: IT Education, Dearing and Democracy in the Information Society conference, Leeds University.
40. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94.
41. Selwyn, N., Marriott, N., & Marriott, P. (2000). Net gains or net pains? Business students' use of the Internet. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(2), 166-186.
42. Spector, J.M., & Anderson, T.M. (Eds.). (2000). Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43. Stahl, B. (2004). E-teaching: The economic threat to the ethical legitimacy of education? Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 155-162.
44. Winn, W. (2003). Research methods and types of evidence for research in educational technology. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 367-373.
45. Winne, P., & Butler, D. (1994). Student cognitive processing & learning. In T. Husen & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 5739-5745). Oxford: Pergamon.
46. Winne, P., & Marx, R. (1982). Students' and teachers' views of thinking processes for classroom learning. The Elementary School Journal, 82(5), 493-518.