Psychometric testing of SPIDER: Data capture tool for systematic literature reviews

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 335-348

  Classen, Sherrilene ^a   Winter, Sandra ^a   Awadzi, Kezia D ^a   Garvan, Cynthia W ^b   Lopez, Ellen D S ^a   Sundaram, Swathy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence based review; Measurement; Validity and reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 46649097037     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.62.3.335     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baker, N. A., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2001). The effectiveness of physical, psychological, and functional interventions in treating clients with multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 324-331.
2. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Validity. In E. G. Carmines & R. A. Zeller, Reliability and validity assessment (pp. 17-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Classen, S., Garvan, C. W., Awadzi, K., Sundaram, S., Winter, S., Lopez, E. D., et al. (2006). Systematic literature review and model for older driver safety. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 22, 87-98.
4. Classen, S., & Lopez, E. D. S. (2006). Mixed methods approach explaining process of an older driver safety systematic literature review. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 22, 99-112.
5. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 4-14). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Crombie, I. K. (2000). The pocket guide to critical appraisal. Bristol, UK: BMJ.
7. Dawson, B., &Trapp, R. G. (1994). Basic and clinical biostatistics (2nd ed.). New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill.
8. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315, 740-743.
9. Cuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Judging the quality of fourth generation evaluation. In E. G. Guba & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Fourth generation evaluation (pp. 228-251). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Holm, M. (2000). Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 575-585.
11. Katrak, P., Bialocerkowski, A. E., Massy-Westropp, N., Kumar, S., & Grimmer, K. A. (2004). A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 22. Retrieved August 9, 2006, from www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/22
12. Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27-36.
13. Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998a). Critical review form - Qualitative studies. Retrieved August 17, 2006, from www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/qualreview.pdf
14. Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998b). Critical review form-Quantitative studies. Retrieved August 27, 2006, from www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/quanreview.pdf
15. MAPLE (Version 10.0) [Computer software]. (2005). Waterloo, Ontario: Waterloo Maple.
16. McGinn, T., Wyer, P. C., Newman, T. B., Keitz, S., Leipzig, R., & Guyatt, G. (2004). Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171, 1369-1373.
17. Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. (2005). Critical appraisal skills programme-Critical appraisal tools. Retrieved August 16, 2006, from www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/S.Reviews%20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf
18. National Health and Medical Research Council. (1999). How to review the evidence: Systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Biotext.
19. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Review Manager (RevMan) (Version 4.2 for Windows) [Computer program]. (2003). Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration.
22. Rudman, D., & Hannah, S. (1998). An instrument evaluation framework: Description and application to assessments of hand function. Journal of Hand Therapy, 11, 266-277.
23. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.
24. Streiner, D. L. (1993). A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 140-148.
25. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Devising the items. In D. L. Streiner & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 15-27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Towheed, T. E. (2005). Systematic review of therapies for osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 13, 455-462.
27. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1991). Reliability and validity of criterion-referenced measures. In Measurement in nursing and health research (2nd ed., pp. 229-256). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
28. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., Lenz, E. R., & Soeken, K. L. (2005). Validity of measures. In C. F. Waltz, O. L. Strickland, & E. R. Lenz (Eds.), Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed., pp. 154-189). New York: Springer.
29. Zaza, S., Wright-De Agüero, L. K., Briss, P. A., Truman, B. I., Hopkins, D. P., Hennessy, M. H., et al. (2000). Data Collection Instrument and Procedure for Systematic Reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1S), 44-74.