Systematic literature review and model for older driver safety

Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 87-98

  Classen, Sherrilene ^a   Garvan, Cynthia W ^b   Awadzi, Kezia ^a   Sundaram, Swathy ^a   Winter, Sandra ^a   Lopez, Ellen D S ^a   Ferree, Nita ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Etiology; Mixed methods approach; Older driver safety; Precede Proceed Model of Health Promotion; Structural model; Systematic literature review

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DRIVER; DRIVING ABILITY; GERIATRIC REHABILITATION; GERIATRICS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFESTYLE; LITERATURE; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745227259     PISSN: 08827524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00013614-200604000-00001     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2000. Older Population. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2001.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Older adult drivers. In: Injury Fact Book 2001-2002. 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/ fact_book/18_Older_Adult_Drivers.htm. Accessed May 4, 2005.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing falls and motor vehicle-related injuries among older adults. 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/programs/injury9.htm. Accessed May 4, 2004.
4. Dellinger AM, Langlois JA, Li G. Fatal crashes among older drivers: decomposition of rates into contributing factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:234-241.
5. Eberhard J. Safe mobility for senior citizens. IATSS Res. 1996;20:29-37.
6. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Fatality facts, older people. Available at: http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/fatality_facts/ older_people.htm. Accessed January 28, 2004.
7. McGwin G Jr, Sims RV, Pulley LV, et al. Relations among chronic medical conditions, medications, and automobile crashes in the elderly: a population-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:424-431.
8. Wang CC, Carr DB. Older driver safety: a report from the older drivers project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:143-149.
9. Staplin L, Lococo K, Byington S, et al. Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration; 2001.
10. Williams AF, Ferguson SA. Rationale for graduated licensing and the risks it should address. Inj Prev. 2002;8(suppl 2):9-14.
11. The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Tips for living: keeping older drivers safe. 2004. Available at: http://www.aota.org/featured/ area6/do-cs/driver.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2005.
12. Marotolli RA, Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, et al. Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms: prospective evidence from the new haven EPESE. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:202-210.
13. Green LW, Ottoson JM. Community & Population Health. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill Higher Education; 1999.
14. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning. 4th ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Publishing Company; 2005.
15. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309:597-599.
16. Cooper H, Hedges LV. Eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994.
17. National Health and Medical Research Council. How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. 1999. Available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp65syn.htm. Accessed January 5, 2005.
18. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:125-133.
19. Pai M, McCulloch M, Gorman JD, et al. Clinical research methods: systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med J India. 2004;17(2):86-95.
20. Classen S, Garvan C, Komaragiri V, et al. Systematic literature review and structural model for older driver safety. Gerontologist. 2005;45(special issue II):463-464.
21. Winter S, Classen S, Garvan C, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of person and stakeholder perspective on safe driving and aging. Gerontologist. 2005;45(special issue II):464.
22. Waterloo Maple Inc. MAPLE Software [computer software]. Version 10.0. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Waterloo Maple Inc; 2005.
23. McGinn T, Wyer PC, Newman TB, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine, part 3: measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). Can Med Assoc J. 2004;171:1369-1373.
24. Classen S, Sundaram S, Garvan CW, Awadzi K, Winter SM, Komaragiri V. Inter-rater reliability of a systematic literature review for older driver safety. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Aging, Disability and Independence. February 1-5, 2006; St Petersburg, Fla. pp. 366-367.
25. Law M, Stewart D, Letts L, et al. Critical review form for qualitative studies. Available at: http://www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/qualreview.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2005.
26. Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme - 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. 2002. Available at: http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/qualitat.htm. Accessed March 17, 2005.
27. Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme - 12 questions to help you make sense of cohort studies. 2002. Available at: http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/cohort%2012%20questions.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2005.
28. World Cancer Research Fund. Second expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Available at: http://www.wcrf.org/research/research_pdfs/slr_specification_manual%20.pdf. Accessed January 02, 2005.
29. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Toung B, et al. Integrative Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence. London: Health Development Agency; 2004.
30. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Guttman M, et al. Advanced mixed method research designs. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook on Mixed Methods in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2003.
31. Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:7-12.
32. SAS Institute Incorporated. Statistical Analysis Software [computer software]. Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2005.
33. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
34. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing, Test, Talk and Interaction. London: Sage; 2001.
35. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
36. Classen S, Lopez DS. Mixed-methods approach explaining process of an older driver safety systematic literature review. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2006;22(2):99-112
37. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
38. Moore A, McQuay H, Gray JAM, eds. Evidence-based everything. Bandolier. 1995;1(12):1.