Mixed methods approach explaining process of an older driver safety systematic literature review

Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 99-112

  Classen, Sherrilene ^a   Lopez, Ellen D S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Investigative techniques; Mixed methods; Older driver safety; Systematic literature review

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; DRIVER; DRIVING ABILITY; GERIATRIC REHABILITATION; GERIATRICS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIFESTYLE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 33745251640     PISSN: 08827524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00013614-200604000-00002     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning. 4th ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfleld Publishing Co; 2005.
2. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:125-133.
3. Classen S, Garvan C, Komaragiri V, et al. Systematic literature review and structural model for older driver safety. Gerontologist. 2005;45(special issue II):463-464.
4. Cooper H, Hedges LV, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 1994.
5. Cochrane Center. What is the Cochrane Collaboration? The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/contact/entities.htm. Accessed December 15, 2005.
6. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Guttman M, et al. Advanced mixed method research designs. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook on Mixed Methods in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2003:209-240.
7. Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:7-12.
8. Blake RL. Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in family research. Fam Syst Med. 1989;7:411-427.
9. National Institutes of Health. Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research. Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Opportunities and Considerations in Application and Review. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1999.
10. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Toung B, et al. Integrative Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence. London: Health Development Agency; 2004.
11. Crabtree BF. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Paper presented at: Qualitative and Mixed Method Research: Improving the Quality of Science and Addressing Health Issues of Diverse Populations. Gerontological Society of America Preconference Workshop; November 18, 2005; Orlando: Fla.
12. Classen S, Sundaram S, Garvan CW, Awadzi K, Winter SM, Komaragiri V. Inter-rater reliability of a systematic literature review for older driver safety. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Aging, Disability and Independence. February 1-5, 2006; St Petersburg, Fla. pp. 366-367.
13. SAS (r)Software. Version 9. Copyright (c) by SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2005.
14. Classen S, Garvan CW, Awadzi K, et al. Systematic literature review and model for older driver safety. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2006;22(2):87-98.
15. Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res. 1996;6:553-560.
16. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.
17. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
18. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing, Test, Talk and Interaction. London: Sage; 2001.
19. Winter S, Classen S, Garvan C, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of person and stakeholder perspective on safe driving and aging. Gerontologist. 2005;45(special issue II):464.