Spatial hyperdynamism in a post-disturbance simulated forest

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 215, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 337-344

  Wang, Qian ^a   Malanson, George P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonization; Competition; Fragmentation; Hyperdynamism

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

COLONIZATION; HABITAT DESTRUCTION; HYPERDYNAMISM;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTATION; COLONIZATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 46549087806     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arii K., and Parrott L. Examining the colonization process of exotic species varying in competitive abilities using a cellular automaton model. Ecological Modelling 199 (2006) 219-228
2. Bolker B.M., and Pacala S.W. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. American Naturalist 153 (1999) 575-602
3. Bolker B.M., Pacala S.W., and Neuhauser C. Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: what do we really know?. American Naturalist 162 (2003) 135-148
4. Debinski D.M. Forest fragmentation and matrix effects: the matrix does matter. Journal of Biogeography 33 (2006) 1791-1792
5. Dunford W., and Freemark K. Matrix matters: effects of surrounding land uses on forest birds near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecology 20 (2004) 497-511
6. Echeverria C., Coomes D.A., Hall M., and Newton A.C. Spatially explicit models to analyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile. Ecological Modelling 212 (2008) 439-449
7. Frohn R.C. Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology (1998), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL
8. Gardner R.H. RULE: map generation and spatial analysis program. In: Klopatek J.M., and Gardner R.H. (Eds). Landscape Ecological Analysis (1999), Springer Verlag, New York 280-303
9. Gardner R.H., and Gustafson E.J. Simulation dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes. Ecological Modelling 171 (2004) 339-358
10. Gardner R.H., and Urban D.L. Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landscape Ecology 22 (2007) 15-29
11. Gerlach G., and Musolf K. Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conservation Biology 14 (2000) 1066-1074
12. Graniero P.A. The influence of landscape heterogeneity and local habitat effects on the response to competitive pressures in metapopulations. Ecological Modelling 203 (2007) 349-362
13. Haefner J.W., Poole G.C., Dunn P.V., and Decker R.T. Edge effects in computer models of spatial competition. Ecological Modelling 56 (1991) 221-244
14. Hernandez, M.-J. Spatiotemporal dynamics in variable population inteactions wth density-dependent interaction coefficients. Ecological Modelling, in press.
15. Holzkamper A., Lausch A., and Seppelt R. Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements. Ecological Modelling 198 (2006) 277-292
16. Hoyle M. When corridors work: insights from a microecosystem. Ecological Modelling 202 (2007) 441-453
17. Hui C., Li Z.Z., and Yue D.X. Metapopulation dynamics and distribution, and environmental heterogeneity induced by niche construction. Ecological Modelling 177 (2004) 107-118
18. Jules E.S., and Shahani P. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. Journal of Vegetation Science 14 (2003) 459-464
19. Kareiva P. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 330 (1990) 175-190
20. Keane R.E., Parsons R.A., and Hessburg P.F. Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach. Ecological Modelling 151 (2002) 29-49
21. Klausmeier C.A. Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. American Naturalist 152 (1998) 303-310
22. Kupfer J.A., Malanson G.P., and Franklin S.B. Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15 (2006) 8-20
23. Laurance W.F. Hyperdynamism in fragmented habitats. Journal of Vegetation Science 13 (2002) 595-602
24. Laurance W.F., Ferreira L.V., Rankin-De Merona J.M., and Laurance S.G. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79 (1998) 2032-2040
25. Levine J.M., and Rees M. Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization. American Naturalist 160 (2002) 452-467
26. Lin Z.S. Simulating unintended effects restoration. Ecological Modelling 164 (2003) 169-175
27. Lin Z.S. The ecological order of persisting species during habitat destruction. Ecological Modelling 184 (2005) 249-256
28. Lin Z.S., Qi X.Z., and Li B.L. Can best competitors avoid extinction as habitat destruction?. Ecological Modelling 182 (2005) 107-112
29. MacArthur R.H. Geographical Ecology (1972), Princeton University Press, Princeton
30. Malanson G.P. Extinction debt trajectories and spatial patterns of habitat destruction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (2002) 177-188
31. Malanson G.P. Spatial representations of habitat in competition-colonization models. Geographical Analysis 34 (2002) 141-154
32. Malanson G.P., and Armstrong M.P. Issues in spatial representation: effects of number of cells and between-cell step size on models of environmental processes. Geographical and Environmental Modelling 1 (1997) 47-64
33. Malanson G.P., Wang Q., and Kupfer J.A. Ecological processes and spatial patterns before, during and after simulated deforestation. Ecological Modelling 202 (2007) 397-409
34. Marshall S.D., Walker S.E., and Rypstra A.L. Two ecologically-divergent generalist predators have different responses to landscape fragmentation. Oikos 114 (2006) 241-248
35. Matsinos Y.G., and Troumbis A.Y. Modeling competition, dispersal and effects of disturbance in the dynamics of a grassland community using a cellular automaton model. Ecological Modelling 149 (2002) 71-83
36. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., and Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps, Version 3.0 (2002), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
37. Mouquet N., Moore J.L., and Loreau M. Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Letters 5 (2002) 56-65
38. Munkemuller T., and Johst K. Compensatory versus over-compensatory density regulation: implications for metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes. Ecological Modelling 197 (2006) 171-178
39. Nee S., and May R.M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 61 (1992) 37-40
40. Neuhauser C. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence in spatially explicit models with local interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 193 (1998) 445-463
41. Pacala S.W., and Rees M. Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. American Naturalist 152 (1998) 729-737
42. Pichancourt J.B., Burel F., and Auger P. Assessing the effect of habitat fragmentation on population dynamics: an implicit modeling approach. Ecological Modelling 192 (2006) 543-556
43. Rukke B.A. Effects of habitat fragmentation: increased isolation and reduced habitat size reduces the incidence of dead wood fungi beetles in a fragmented forest landscape. Ecography 23 (2000) 492-502
44. Saupe D. Algorithms for random fractals. In: Peitgen H.-O., and Saupe D. (Eds). The Science of Fractal Images (1988), Springer Verlag, New York 71-136
45. Schroder B., and Seppelt R. Analysis of pattern-process interactions based on landscape models-overview, general concepts, and methodological issues. Ecological Modelling 199 (2006) 505-516
46. Terborgh J., Lopez L., Nunez P., Rao M., Shahabuddin G., Orihuela G., Riveros M., Ascanio R., Adler G.H., Lambert T.D., and Balbas L. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294 (2001) 1923-1926
47. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L., and Nowak M.A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371 (1994) 65-66
48. Tilman D., Lehman C.L., and Yin C. Habitat destruction, dispersal and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. American Naturalist 149 (1997) 407-435
49. Turnbull L.A., Rees M., and Crawley M.J. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. Journal of Ecology 87 (1999) 899-912
50. Turnbull L.A., Coomes D.A., Purves D.W., and Rees M. How spatial structure alters population and community dynamics in a natural plant community. Journal of Ecology 95 (2007) 78-89
51. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., and O'Neill R.V. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice (2001), Springer Verlag, New York
52. Vuilleumier S., and Fontanillas P. Landscape structure affects dispersal in the greater white-toothed shrew: inference between genetic and simulated ecological distances. Ecological Modelling 201 (2007) 369-376
53. Wimberly M.C. Species dynamics in disturbed landscapes: when does a shifting habitat mosaic enhance connectivity?. Landscape Ecology 21 (2006) 35-46
54. Wu J.G., and Vankat J.L. An area based model of species richness dynamics of forest islands. Ecological Modelling 58 (1991) 249-271
55. Yu D.W., and Wilson H.B. The competition-colonization trade-off is dead: long live the competition-colonization trade-off. American Naturalist 158 (2001) 49-63