Can best competitors avoid extinction as habitat destruction?

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 182, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 107-112

  Lin, Zhen Shan ^a   Qi, Xiang Zhen ^a   Li, Bai Lian ^b  

^a NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Extinction; Habitat destruction; n Population metapopulation; Nonlinear

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

HABITAT DESTRUCTION; MATHEMATICS ANALYSIS; METAPOLPULATION MODEL;

ECOLOGY;

COMPETITIVE ABILITY; EXTINCTION; HABITAT LOSS; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION MODELING;

EID: 11444254507     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allaby, M., 1998. Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 10-200.
2. Dytham C. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: a cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:1994;490-491
3. Gathmann F.O., Williams D.D. Inter-site: a new tool for the simulation of spatially realistic population dynamics. Ecol. Modell. 113:1998;125-139
4. Hanski I. Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology. 64:1983;483-500
5. Hanski, I., Simberloff, D., 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. In: Hanski, I., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology, Cology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 5-26.
6. Hanski, I., 1999. Metapopulation Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 40-350.
7. Hui C., Li Z. Dynamical complexity and metapopulation persistence. Ecol. Modell. 164:2003;201-209
8. Kindvall, O., Petersson, A., 2000. Consequences of modeling interpach migration as a function of patch geometry when predicting metapopulation extinction risk. Ecol. Modell., 101-109.
9. Klausmeier C.A. Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. Am. Nat. 152:1998;303-308
10. Levins R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15:1969;237-240
11. Levins, R., 1970. Extinction. In: Some Mathematical Problems in Biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp. 75-107.
12. Lin Z.S. Simulating unitended effects restoration. Ecol. Modell. 164:2003;169-175
13. Moilanen A., Hanski I. Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:1995;141-144
14. Nee S., May R.M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61:1992;37-40
15. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L., Nowak M.A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 371:1994;65-66
16. Tilman D., Lehman C.L., Yin C. Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. Am. Nat. 149:1997;407-435
17. Walters S. Landscape pattern and productivity effects on source-sink dynamics of deer population. Ecol. Modell. 143:2001;17-32