Singular perturbation analysis of an electrohydraulic servo-drive with discontinuous reduced dynamics

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 7B-1999, Issue , 1999, Pages 2001-2011

  Manhartsgruber, Bernhard ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUTOFF FREQUENCY; FEEDBACK CONTROL; NONLINEAR FEEDBACK; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; POSITION CONTROL; STATE FEEDBACK; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

DESIGN PARAMETERS; ELECTROHYDRAULIC SERVOS; NON LINEAR CONTROL; NONLINEAR COMPOSITE; PRESSURE DIFFERENCES; PROPORTIONAL FEEDBACK; SINGULAR PERTURBATION ANALYSIS; SINGULAR PERTURBATION METHOD;

FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION;

EID: 46449137295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC99-VIB-8178     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Athans, ML & Falb, P. (1966). Optimal Control, McGraw-Hill.
2. Bobrow, J. E. & Lum, K. (1996). Adaptive, high bandwith control of a hydraulic actuator, Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 118: 714-720.
3. Fenichel, N. (1979). Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations, Journal of Differential Equations 31: 53-98.
4. Feuser, A. & Piechnick, M. (1993). Antriebs-Dimensionierung unter Berucksichtigung von Zylinderflachen- und Steuerkantenverhaltnissen, O+P Olhydraulik und Pneumatik 37(6): 509-516.
5. Finney, J. M., de Pennington, A., Bloor, M. S. & Gill, G. S. (1985). A pole assignment controller for an electrohydraulic cylinder drive, Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 107: 145-150.
6. Gessat, J. (1997). Reibungsverhalten von Hydraulikdichtungen und Fuhrungselementen, O+P Olhydraulik und Pnewnatik 41: 743-746.
7. Jacobs, M. & Roth, J. (1982). Rechnerunterstutzte Auslegung und Realisierung von Regelungskonzepten fur elektrohydraulische Antriebe, 5. Aachener Fluidtechnisches Kolloquium, Fachgebiet Hydraulik, Band 2, pp. 239-262.
8. Jinghong, Y., Zhaoneng, C. & Yuanzhang, L. (1994). The variation of oil effective bulk modulus with pressure in hydraulic systems, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 116: 146-150.
9. Kokotovic, P. V., Khalil, H. K. & O'Reilly, J. (1986). Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design., Academic Press, London etc.
10. Manhartsgruber, B. & Scheidl, R. (1998). Non-linear control of hydraulic servo-drives based on a singular perturbation approach, in C. A. Burrows & K. A. Edge (eds), Proceedings of Bath Workshop on Power Transmission and Motion Control, Professional Engineering Publishing, London, pp. 301-313.
11. Manring, N. D. (1997). The effective fluid bulk-modulus within a hydrostatic transmission, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 119: 462-466.
12. Merritt, H. E. (1967). Hydraulic Control Systems, John Wiley, New York.
13. Plummer, A. R. & Vaughan, N. D. (1996). Robust adaptive control for hydraulic servosystems, Transactions of the ASME. Journal ofDynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 118: 237-244.
14. Vaughan, N. D. & Plummer, A. R. (1990). Some issues in pole placement control of electro-hydraulic servos, Proceedings of Third Bath International Fluid Power Workshop, Bath, UK, pp. 6-28.
15. Yun, J. S. & Cho, H. S. (1991). Application of an adaptive model following control technique to a hydraulic servo systeme subjected to unknown disturbances, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 113: 479-486.