Measuring adhesive performance in transdermal delivery systems

American Journal of Drug Delivery

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 193-206

  Minghetti, Paola ^a   Cilurzo, Francesco ^a   Casiraghi, Antonella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARMONIL; ARMONIL SEPTEM; BUPRENORPHINE; CATAPRES TTC; CLONIDINE; COUMARIN; DERMESTRIL SEPTEM; DICLOFENAC DERIVATIVE; DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE; ELLESTE SOLO; EPINITRIL; ESCLIM; ESTALIS TTS; ESTRADIOL; ESTRADIOL PLUS NORETHISTERONE ACETATE; ETHINYLESTRADIOL PLUS NORELGESTROMIN; FEMSEVEN; FENTANYL; FLECTOR TISSUGEL; FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE; FLURBIPROFEN; FLUVEAN; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; HOKUNALIN TAPE; KETOPROFEN; LIDOCAINE; MICONAZOLE NITRATE; NEURODOL TISSUGEL; OXYBUTYNIN; PIROXICAM; SCOPOLAMINE; TESTOSTERONE; TRANSACT LAC; TRINIPLAS; TULOBUTEROL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; JAPAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SKIN PENETRATION; STANDARDIZATION; THICKNESS; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4644363509     PISSN: 11759038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00137696-200402030-00004     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Riedel DJ, Wick KA, Hawkinson RW, et al. Performance of a new transdermal nitroglycerin adhesive patch formulation. Clin Ther 1989; 11: 225-31
2. Powers Cramer M, Saks SR. Translating safety, efficacy and compliance into economic value for controlled release dosage forms. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 5 (6): 482-504
3. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Montanari L. Evaluation of adhesive properties of patches based on acrylic matrices. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999; 25 (1): 1-6
4. Hay JW, Hill WL. Cost-effectiveness of two transdermal nitroglycerin control-release systems. Clin Ther 1985; 8 (l): 35-40
5. Cronin CM, Mitrano EA, Wilder RS, et al. Comparative evaluation of the three commercially available transdermal nitroglycerin delivery systems. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1987; 21: 642-4
6. Chinoy DA, Breaux PC, Ibrahim F. Comparison of adhesive properties of two transdermal nitroglycerin controlled-release systems. Clin Ther 1985; 8: 30-4
7. Chinoy DA, Camp J, Elchahal S, et al. A multicenter comparison of adhesion, preference, tolerability, and safety characteristics of two transdermal nitroglycerin delivery systems: Transderm-Nitro™ and Deponit™. Clin Ther 1989; 11: 678-84
8. Shultz J, Nardin M. Theories and mechanisms of adhesion. In: Pizzi A. Mittal KL, editors. Handbook of adhesive technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1994: 19-34
9. Ginn ME, Noyes CM, Jungermann E. The contact angle of water on viable human skin. J Colloid Interface Sci 1968; 26 (2): 146-51
10. Kenney JF, Haddok TH, Sun RL, et al. Medical-grade acrylic adhesives for skin contact. J Appl Polym Sci 1992; 45: 355-61
11. Rohn CL. Rheology of pressure sensitive adhesives, In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 3rd ed. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates, 1999: 153-70
12. Hammond FH. Tack. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989: 38-60
13. Dalhquist CA. Creep. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 3rd ed. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates. 1999: 121-38
14. Chivers RA. Easy removal of pressure sensitive adhesives for skin applications, Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2001; 21: 381-8
15. Johnston J. Testing: general and specific, In: Johnston J, editor. Pressure sensitive adhesive tapes, Illinois: Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2003: 153-78
16. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC-6 Tack rolling ball, revised 6/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 35-6
17. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D3121-94 (1999) Standard test method for tack of pressure-sensitive adhesive by rolling ball [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/ D1450.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058469002 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
18. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1721:1998 Adhesives for paper and board, packaging and disposable sanitary products: tack measurement for pressure sensitive adhesives: determination rolling ball track [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cenorm.be/catweb/83.180.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
19. European Association for the Self Adhesive Tape Industry. AFERA 4025 T1 Measurement of tack by probe method, revised 10/81 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.afera.com/testm.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
20. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D2979-01 Standard test method for pressure sensitive tack of adhesives using an inverted probe machine [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/ D1450.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058469002 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
21. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC-5 Quick stick of pressure sensitive tapes, revised 6/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 33-35
22. European Association for the Self Adhesive Tape Industry. AFERA 4015 Quick stick. revised 09/79 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.afera.com/testm.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
23. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1945:1996 Self-adhesive tapes: measurement of quick stick [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cenorm.be/catweb/83.180.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
24. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC-16 Standard test method for loop tack, date of issuance 10/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 63-8
25. FTM 9 Loop tack measurement [online]. Available from URL: http://www.finat.com/ [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
26. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1719:1998 Adhesives for paper and board, packaging and disposable sanitary products: tack measurement for pressure sensitive adhesives: determination of loop tack [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cenorm.be/catweb/83.180.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
27. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D6195-03 Standard test methods for loop tack [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/ D1450.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058469002 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
28. Tag and Label Manufacturers Industries. LIB1 Loop tack test [online]. Available from URL: http://www.tlmi.com/data/literature/standard.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
29. Tag and Label Manufacturers Industries. LIB2 Tensile Tester Loop Tack Test [online]. Available from URL: http://www.tlmi.com/data/literature/standard.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
30. Satas D. Medical products, In: Satas D. editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 3rd ed. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates. 1999: 707-23
31. Johnson MI. Tack measurement. In: Satas D, editor. Advances in pressure sensitive adhesive technology. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates, 1998: 209-18
32. Shull KR, Crosby AJ, Lakrout H. Probe tack test of pressure sensitive adhesives with flat and spherical punches. Proceedings 22nd Annual Meeting of the Adhesion Society; 1999 Feb 21-24; Panama City Beach, USA, 62-85
33. Zosel A. The effect of fibrillation on the tack of pressure sensitive adhesives, Int J Adhesion Adhesives 1998; 18: 265-71
34. FTM 18 Dynamic shear [online]. Available from URL: http://www.finat.com/ [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
35. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. Adhesive tape. USP 26 Rockville (MD) 20852, 2003: 1756
36. European Association for the Self Adhesive Tape Industry. AFERA 4012 Measurement of shear adhesion, issued 09/79 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.afera.com/testm.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
37. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC-107 International standard for shear adhesion of pressure sensitive tape, revised 10/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 37-44
38. FTM 8 Resistance to shear from a standard surface [online]. Available from URL: http://www.finat.com/ [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
39. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1943:2002 Self-adhesive tapes: measurement of static shear adhesion [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cenorm.be/catweb/83.180.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
40. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D3654/D3654M-02 Standard test methods for shear adhesion of pressure-sensitive tapes [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/ D1014.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058454809 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
41. Tag and Label Manufacturers Industries. LIC Static shear test [online]. Available from URL: http://www.tlmi.com/data/literature/standard.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
42. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC-101 International standard for peel adhesion of pressure sensitive tape, revised 10/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 33-44
43. FTM 1 Peel adhesion (180°) at 300mm per minute [online]. Available from URL: http://www.finat.com/ [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
44. FTM 2 Peel adhesion (90°) at 300mm per minute [online]. Available from URL: http://www.finat.com/ [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
45. European Association for the Self Adhesive Tape Industry. AFERA 4001 Peel adhesion of adhesive tape on stainless steel, revised 10/87 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.afera.com/testm.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
46. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1939:1996 Self adhesive tapes: measurement of peel adhesion from stainless steel or from its own backing, [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cenorm.be/catweb/83.180.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
47. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D3330/D3330M-02 Standard test method for peel adhesion of pressure-sensitive tape [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/ D1014.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058454809 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
48. Tag and Label Manufactures Industries. L-IA1 180° peel adhesion-force stock [online]. Available from URL: http://www.tlmi.com/data/literature/standard.html [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
49. Committee of the Japanese Pharmacopeia Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical and Medical Safety Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Adhesive Plaster, Jap Pharmacopeia. XIV ed. Tokyo 100-8916, 2001: 858
50. Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. PSTC- 14 Adhesion of pressure sensitive tapes to fiberboard at 90° angle and constant stress, revised 6/00. In: Test methods for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. 13th ed. Stonebridge Lane (IL): Pressure Sensitive Tape Council, 2000: 53-8
51. American Society of Testing Materials. ASTM D2860/D2860M-90(1999) Standard test method for adhesion of pressure-sensitive tape to fiberboard at 90° angle and constant stress [online]. Available from URL: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/COMMIT/SUBCOMM1T/ D1014.htm?.L+mystore+pixb8154+1058454809 [Accessed 2003 Jul 17]
52. Muny RP. Testing pressure sensitive adhesives. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 3rd ed. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates. 1999: 139-52
53. Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Cilurzo F, et al. Evaluation of adhesive properties of transdermal therapeutic systems containing nitroglycerin. Boll Chim Farm 2001; 140 (2): 63-7
54. Lin SY, Lee CJ, Lin YY. The effect of plasticizers on compatibility, mechanical properties and adhesion strength of drug free eudragit E films. Pharm Res 1991; 8 (9): 1137-43
55. Lin SY, Lee CJ, Lin YY. Drug polymer interaction affecting the mechanical properties, adhesion strength and release kinetics of piroxicam-loaded eudragit E films plasticized with different plasticizers. J Control Release 1995; 33: 375-81
56. Sheu TM, Chen LC, Ho HO. Simultaneous optimisation of percutaneous delivery and adhesion for ketoprofen poultice. Int J Pharm 2002; 233: 257-62
57. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Tosi L, et al. Design of a new water-soluble pressure-sensitive adhesive for patch preparation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2003; 4 (1): 53-61
58. Ko CU, Effect of skin penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery adhesives on skin adhesion and irritation, Int Symp Control Rel Bioact Mater 1996; 23: 281-2
59. Trenor SR, Suggs AE. Love BJ. Influence of penetration enhancers on the thermomechanical properties and peel strength of a poly(isobutylene) pressure sensitive adhesive. J Mater Sci Lett 2002; 21: 1321-3
60. Dimas DA, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM, et al. Effect of several factors on the mechanical properties of pressure sensitive adhesives used in transdermal therapeutic systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 2000; 1 (2): E16
61. Kyriazanou AM, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM, et al. Effect of several factors on the mechanical properties of a pressure sensitive adhesive containing penetration enhancers. STP Pharma Sci 2002; 12 (5): 283-6
62. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, et al. Effect of polyvynilpyrrolidone on ketorofen patches based on methacrylic copolymers. Acta Technologiae et Legis Medicamenti 2001: XII (3): 199-212
63. Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Cilurzo F, et al. Development of local patches containing melilot extract and ex vivo-in vivo evaluation of skin permeation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000; 10 (2): 111-7
64. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, et al. Dermal patches for the controlled release of miconazole: influence of the drug concentration on the technological characteristics. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999; 25 (5): 679-84
65. Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, et al. The effect of thickness and water content on the adhesive properties of methacrylic patches. Acta Technologiae et Legis Medicamenti 2000; XI (2): 81-92
66. Satas D. Peel. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 3rd ed. Warwick (RI): Satas & Associates, 1999: 62-86
67. Rajeckas V. Bond strength and its prognosis, In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology. 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989: 115-57
68. Panaitescu LS, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM. Optimization of the mechanical properties of a pressure sensitive adhesive containing penetration enhancers. 25th Int Symp Control Rel Bioact Mater; 1998; 25: 551-2
69. Kientz E, Charmeau JY, Holl Y, et al. Adhesion of latex films. Part I. Poly(2-ethyl-hexyl methacrylate) on glass. J Adhesion Sci Technol 1996; 10 (8): 745-59
70. Spencer TS, Smith SE, Seshadri C. Adhesive interactions between polymers and skin in transdermal delivery systems. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1990; 63: 337-9
71. Brockmann W, Huther R. Adhesion mechanisms of pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives 1996; 16: 81-6
72. Liouzou L, Sournac M. Bougaret J. The peel patch tester: a new apparatus to measure in vivo adhesiveness of transdermal delivery systems (TDS). 3rd World Meeting APGI/APV; 2000 Apr 3-6; Berlin, 705-6
73. Steven-Fountain AJ, Atkins AG. Jeronimidis G, et al. The effect of flexible substrates on pressure-sensitive adhesive performance, Int J Adhesion Adhesives 2002; 22: 423-30
74. Fauth C, Wiedersberg S, Neubert RHH, et al. Adhesive backing foil interactions affecting the elasticity, adhesion strength, of laminates, and how to interpret these properties of branded transdermal patches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2002; 28 (10): 1251-9
75. Maillard-Salin DG. Bécourt P, Couarraze G. Physical evaluation of a new patch made of a progestomimetic in a silicon matrix, Int J Pharm 2000; 199: 29-38
76. Venkatraman S, Gale R. Skin adhesives and skin adhesion 1: transdermal drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1119-36