The need for evidence in medical education: The development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research

Academic Medicine

Volumn 79, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 925-930

  Dauphinee, W Dale ^a   Wood Dauphinee, Sharon ^b  

^a Medical Council of Canada   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 4644353652     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00005     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to the teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420-5.
2. Cochrane Collaboration Web site 〈www.cochrane.org/index2.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2004. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration Secretariat, 2004.
3. Wolf FM, Shea JA, Albanese MA. Toward setting a research agenda for systematic reviews of evidence of the effects of medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13:54-60.
4. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res. 1976;5:3-8.
5. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
6. Davies P. Approaches to evidence-based teaching. Med Teach. 2000;22:14-21.
7. BEME Group. Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME): report of meeting - 3-5 December 1999, London, UK. Med Teach. 2000;22:242-5.
8. Hart IR, Harden RM. Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME): a plan for action. Med Teach. 2001;22:131-5.
9. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Patient Safety. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1999.
10. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press,2001.
11. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(suppl):166-206.
12. Reinhardt UE, Hussey PS, Anderson GF. U.S health care spending in an international context. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(3):10-23.
13. Steinberg EP. Improving the quality of care - can we practice what we preach? N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2681-3.
14. Miles A, Grey JE, Polychronis A, Price N, Melchiorri C. Current thinking in the evidence-based health care debate. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):95-109.
15. Davidoff F. In the teeth of evidence: the curious case of evidence-based medicine. Mt Sinai J Med. 1999;66:75-83.
16. Naylor CD. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;345:840-2.
17. Feinstein AR, Horowitz RI. Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine." Am J Med. 1997;103:529-35.
18. Tonelli MR. The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Acad Med. 1998;33:1234-40.
19. Miettinen OS. Evidence in medicine: invited commentary. CMAJ. 1998;158:215-21.
20. BEME Collaboration Web site 〈http://www.bemecollaboration.org/ infrastructure〉. Accessed 24 May 2004.
21. Bligh J, Anderson MB. Medical teachers and evidence. Med Educ. 2000;34:162-3.
22. Norman G. Best evidence medical education and the perversity of human as subjects. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6:1-3.
23. Ten Cate O. What happens to the student? The neglected variable in educational outcome research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6:81-8.
24. Norman G. Reflections on BEME. Med Teach. 2000;22:141-4.
25. van der Vleuten CPM, Dolmans DHJM, Scherpbier AJJA. The need for evidence in education. Med Teach. 2000;22:246-50.
26. Murray E. Challenges in educational research. Med Educ. 2002;36:110-2.
27. Berliner DC. Educational research: the hardest science of all. Educ Res. 2002;31:18-20.
28. Leach DC. Commentaries: a model for GME: shifting from process to outcomes. A program report from the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Med Educ. 2004;38:12-4.
29. Horowitz SD, Miller SH, Miles PV. Commentaries: board certification and physician quality. Med Educ. 2004;38:10-1.
30. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. General competences in accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(5):103-11.
31. United Kingdom Medical Research Council. A Framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health [unpublished]. Medical Research Council, 2000.
32. Burkhardt H, Schoenfeld AH. Improving educational research: towards a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educ Res. 2003;32(9):3-14.
33. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997;315:418-21.
34. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the united kingdom and the united states: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79:291-315.
35. Davies P. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Rev Educ. 2000;26:365-78.
36. Petros P. Non-linearity in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9:171-8.