Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 3169-3178

  Wang, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dominant markers; Population structure; Probability of identity by descent; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOMINANT GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, DOMINANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; STATISTICS;

EID: 4644346458     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02298.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albertson RC, Markert JA, Danley PD, Kocher TD (1999) Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 5107-5110.
2. Degen B, Caron H, Bandou E, Maggia L, Chevallier MH, Leveau A, Kremer A (2001) Fine-scale spatial genetic structure of eight tropical tree species as analysed by RAPDs. Heredity, 87, 497-507.
3. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A (2000) Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1037-1048.
4. Hardy OJ (2003) Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1577-1588.
5. Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA finger-prints due to chance and relatedness. Human Heredity, 43, 45-52.
6. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 82, 1420-1425.
7. Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5, 584-599.
8. Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic-structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology, 3, 91-99.
9. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 1753-1766.
10. Lynch M, Walsh JB (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
11. Milligan BG (2003) Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics, 163, 1153-1167.
12. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using molecular markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
13. Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Genetical Research, 67, 175-186.
14. Ritland K (2000) Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1195-1204.
15. Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E (2001) A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimates. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1539-1549.
16. Wang J (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160, 1203-1215.
17. Wilding CS, Butlin RK, Grahame J (2001) Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 611-619.