The tritocerebrum of Euarthropoda: A "non-drosophilocentric" perspective

Evolution and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 303-309

  Harzsch, Steffen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION;

ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; BRAIN; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; BRAIN; PHYLOGENY;

ARTHROPODA;

EID: 4644319298     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04038.x     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Abzhanov, A., and Kaufman, T. C. 2000. Evolution of distinct expression patterns for engrailed paralogues in higher crustaceans (Malacostraca). Dev. Genes Evol. 210: 493-506.
2. Abzhanov, A., Popadic, A., and Kaufman, T. C. 1999. Chelicerate Hox genes and the homology of arthropod segments. Evol. Dev. 2: 77-89.
3. Ax, P. 1999. Dos System der Metazoa II. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, Lübeck, Ulm.
4. Böhm, H., Dybek, E., and Heinzel, H. G. 2001. Anatomy and in vivo activity of neurons connecting the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system to the brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 187: 393-403.
5. Boyan, G. S., Reichert, H., and Hirth, F. 2003. Commissure formation in the embryonic insect brain. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 32: 61-78.
6. Breidbach, O. 1995. Is the evolution of the arthropod brain convergent? In O. Breidbach and W. Kutsch (eds.). The Nervous System of Invertebrates: An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach. Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin, pp. 383-406.
7. Breidbach, O., Dircksen, H., and Wegerhoff, R. 1995. Common general morphological pattern of peptidergic neurons in the arachnid brain: crustacean cardioactive peptide-immunoreactive neurons in the protocerebrum of seven arachnid species. Cell Tissue Res. 279: 183-197.
8. Breidbach, O., and Wegerhoff, R. 1993. Neuroanatomy of the central nervous system of the harvestman, Rilaena triangularis (HERBST 1799) (Arachnida; Opiliones) - principal organization, Gaba-like and serotonin- immunohistochemistry. Zool. Anz. 230: 55-81.
9. Cook, C. E., Smith, M. L., Telford, M. J., Bastianello, A., and Akam, M. 2001. Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods. Curr. Biol. 11: 759-763.
10. Damen, W., and Tautz, D. 1999. Comparative molecular embryology of arthropods: the expression of Hox genes in the spider Cupiennius salei. Invertebrate Reprod. Dev. 36: 203-209.
11. Damen, W. G. M., Hausdorf, M., Seyfarth, E. A., and Tautz, D. 1998. A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 10665-10670.
12. Dewel, R. A., Budd, G. E., Castano, D. F., and Dewel, W. C. 1999. The organization of the subesophageal nervous system in Tardigrades: insights into the arthropod hypostome and tritocerebrum. Zool. Anz. 23: 191-203.
13. Dewel, R. A., and Dewel, W. C. 1996. The brain of Echiniscus viridissimus (Heterotardigradia): a key to understanding the phylogenetic position of tardigrades and the evolution of the arthropod head. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 116: 35-49.
14. Dohle, W. 1997. Myriapod-insect relationships as opposed to an insect-crustacean sister group relationship. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.). Arthropod Relationships. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 305-316.
15. Dohle, W. 2001. Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name "Tetraconata" for the monophyletic unit Crustacea + Hexapoda. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 37: 85-103.
16. Elofsson, R., and Hessler, R. R. 1990. Central nervous system of Hutchinsoniella macracantha (Cephalocarida). J. Crust. Biol. 10: 423-439.
17. Eriksson, B. J., and Budd, G. E. 2000. Onychophoran cephalic nerves and their bearing on out understanding of head segmentation and stem-group evolution of Arthropoda. Arthropod. Struct. Dev. 29: 197-209.
18. Eriksson, B. J., Tait, N. N., and Budd, G. E. 2003. Head development in the onychophoran Euperipatoides kanangrensis with particular reference to the central nervous system. J. Morphol. 255: 1-23.
19. Fahrbach, S. E. 2004. What arthropod brains say about arthropod phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 3723-3724.
20. Fanenbruck, M., Harzsch, S., and Wägele, J. W. 2004. The brain of the Remipedia (Crustacea) and an alternative hypothesis on their phylogenetic relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 3868-3873.
21. Friedrich, M., and Tautz, D. 2001. Arthropod rDNA phylogeny revisited: a consistency analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 37: 21-40.
22. Graf, S., Ludwig, P., and Boyan, G. 2000. Lazarillo expression reveals a subset of neurons contributing to the primary axon scaffold of the embryonic brain of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria. J. Comp. Neurol. 419: 394-405.
23. Hafner, G. S., and Tokarski, T. R. 2001. Retinal development in the lobster Homarus americanus: comparison with compound eyes of insects and other crustaceans. Cell Tissue Res. 305: 147-158.
24. Harzsch, S. 2001. Entwicklung des Nervensystems der Crustacea: ein Beitrag zur Phylogenie der Arthropoda. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Bielefeld, pp. 1-296.
25. Harzsch, S. 2002a. From stem cell to structure: neurogenesis in decapod crustaceans. In K. Wiese (ed.). The Crustacean Nervous System. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 417-432.
26. Harzsch, S. 2002b. The phylogenetic significance of crustacean optic neuropils and chiasmata: a re-examination. J. Comp. Neurol. 453: 10-21.
27. Harzsch, S. 2003. Ontogeny of the ventral nerve cord in malacostracan crustaceans: a common plan for neuronal development in Crustacea, Hexapoda and other Arthropoda? Arthropod Struct. Dev. 32: 17-38.
28. Harzsch, S., Anger, K., and Dawirs, R. R. 1997. Immunocytochemical detection of acetylated tubulin and Drosophila synapsin in the embryonic crustacean nervous system. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 41: 477-484.
29. Harzsch, S., Benton, J., Dawirs, R. R., and Beltz, B. 1999. A new look at embryonic development of the visual system in decapod crustaceans: neuropil formation, neurogenesis and apoptotic cell death. J. Neurobiol. 39: 294-306.
30. Harzsch, S., and Glötzner, J. 2002. An immunohistochemical study on structure and development of the nervous system in the brine shrimp Artemia salina Linnaeus, 1758 (Branchiopoda, Anostraca) with remarks on the evolution of the arthropod brain. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 30: 251-270.
31. Harzsch, S., Miller, J., Benton, J., Dawirs, R., and Beltz, B. 1998. Development of the thoracic neuromeres in two crustaceans with different styles of metamorphic development. J. Exp. Biol. 210: 2465-2479.
32. Harzsch, S., Sandeman, D., and Chaigneau, J. in press. Morphology and development of the central nervous system. In J. Forest and J. C. von Vaupel Klein (eds.). Treatise on Zoology - Crustacea. Koninklijke Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden.
33. Harzsch, S., and Walossek, D. 2001. Neurogenesis in the developing visual system of the branchiopod crustacean Triops longicaudatus (LeConte, 1846): corresponding patterns of compound-eye formation in Crustacea and Insecta? Dev. Genes Evol. 211: 37-43.
34. Hughes, C. L., and Kaufman, T. C. 2000. A diverse approach to arthropod development. Evol. Dev. 2: 6-8.
35. Hwang, U. W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C. J., and Kim, W. 2001. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413: 154-157.
36. Klass, K. D., and Kristensen, N. P. 2001. The ground plan and affinities of hexapods: recent progress and open problems. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 37: 265-298.
37. Kraus, O. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships between higher taxa of tracheate arthropods. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.). Arthropod Relationships. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 295-304.
38. Kraus, O. 2001. "Myriapoda" and the ancestry of Hexapoda. Origin of the Hexapoda. Am. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 37: 105-127.
39. Loesel, R., Nässel, D. R., and Strausfeld, N. J. 2002. Common design in a unique midline neuropil in the brains of arthropods. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 31: 77-91.
40. Loesel, R., and Strausfeld, N. J. 2003. Common design in brains of velvet worms and chelicerates and their phylogenetic relationships. In N. Elsner and H. Zimmermann (eds.). The Neurosciences from Basic Research to Therapy. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, p. 677.
41. Ludwig, P., Williams, L., Nässel, D. R., Reichert, H., and Boyan, G. 2001. Primary commissure pioneer neurons in the brain of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria: development, ultrastructure, and neuropeptide expression. J. Comp. Neurol. 430: 118-130.
42. Melzer, R. R., Diersch, R., Nicastro, D., and Smola, U. 1997. Compound eye evolution: highly conserved retinula and cone cell patterns indicate a common origin of the insect and crustacean ommatidium. Naturwissenschaften 84: 542-544.
43. Melzer, R., Michalke, C., and Smola, U. 2000. Walking on insect paths: early ommatidial development in the compound eye of the ancestral crustacean Triops cancriformis. Naturwissenschaften 87: 308-311.
44. Mittmann, B., and Scholtz, G. 2003. Development of the nervous system in the "head" of Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata: Xiphosura): morphological evidence for a correspondence between the segments of the chelicerae and of the (first) antennae of Mandibulata. Dev. Genes Evol. 213: 9-17.
45. Müller, C., Rosenberg, J., Richter, S., and Meyer-Rochow, V. B. 2003. The compound eye of Scutigera coleoptrata (Linnaeus, 1758) (Chilopoda: Notostigmophora): an ultrastructural re-investigation that adds support to the Mandibulata-concept. Zoomorphology 122: 191-209.
46. Nilsson, D., and Osorio, D. 1997. Homology and parallelism in arthropod sensory processing. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.). Arthropod Relationships. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 333-348.
47. Osorio, D., Averof, M., and Bacon, J. P. 1995. Arthropod evolution: great brains, beautiful bodies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 449-454.
48. Page, D. T. 2004. A mode of arthropod brain evolution suggested by Drosophila commissure development. Evol. Dev. 6: 25-31.
49. Paulus, H. F. 2000. Phylogeny of the Myriapoda-Crustacea-Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure. J. Zool. System. Evol. Res. 38: 189-208.
50. Peterson, K. J., and Eernisse, D. J. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol. Dev. 3: 170-205.
51. Regier, J. C., and Shultz, J. W. 2001a. Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20: 136-148.
52. Regier, J. C., and Shultz, J. W. 2001b. A phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda (Arthropoda) using two nuclear protein-encoding genes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 469-486.
53. Richter, S. 1999. The structure of the ommatidia of the Malacostraca (Crustacea) - a phylogenetic approach. Verh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 38: 161-204.
54. Richter, S. 2002. The Tetraconata concept: hexapod-crustacean relationships and the phylogeny of Crustacea. Org. Divers. Evol. 2: 217-237.
55. Rogers, B. T., and Kaufman, T. C. 1997. Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila. Int. Rev. Cytol. 174: 1-84.
56. Scholtz, G. 1995. Head segmentation in Crustacea - an immunocytochemical study. Zoology 98: 104-114.
57. Shultz, J. W., and Regier, J. C. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1011-1019.
58. Sinakevitch, I., Douglass, J. K., Scholtz, G., Loesel, R., and Strausfeld, N. J. 2003. Conserved and convergent organization in the optic lobes of insects and isopods, with reference to other crustacean taxa. J. Comp. Neurol. 467: 150-172.
59. Strausfeld, N. J. 1998. Crustacean-insect relationships: the use of brain characters to derive phylogeny amongst segmented invertebrates. Brain Behav. Evol. 52: 186-206.
60. Strausfeld, N. J., and Barth, F. G. 1993. Two visual systems in one brain: neuropils serving the principal eyes of the spider Cupiennius salei. J. Comp. Neurol. 328: 43-62.
61. Strausfeld, N. J., Buschbeck, E. K., and Gomez, R. S. 1995. The arthropod mushroom body: its functional roles, evolutionary enigmas and mistaken identities. In O. Breidbach and W. Kutsch (eds.). The Nervous System of Invertebrates: An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach. Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin, pp. 349-406.
62. Strausfeld, N. L., Hansen, L., Li, Y., and Gomez, R. S. 1998. Evolution, discovery, and interpretations of arthropod mushroom bodies. Learning Mem. 5: 11-37.
63. Strausfeld, N. J., and Hildebrand, J. G. 1999. Olfactory systems: common design, uncommon origins? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9: 634-640.
64. Strausfeld, N. J., Welzzien, P., and Barth, F. G. 1993. Two visual systems in one brain: neuropils serving the principal eyes of the spider Cupiennius salei. J. Comp. Neurol. 328: 63-75.
65. Telford, M. J., and Thomas, R. H. 1998. Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 10671-10675.
66. Urbach, R., and Technau, G. M. 2003. Early steps in building the insect brain: neuroblast formation and segmental patterning in the developing brain of different insect species. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 32: 103-124.
67. Utting, M., Agricola, H. J., Sandeman, R., and Sandeman, D. 2000. Central complex in the brain of crayfish and its possible homology with that of insects. J. Comp. Neurol. 416: 245-261.
68. Vilpoux, K., and Waloszek, D. 2003. Larval development and morphogenesis of the sea spider Pycnogonum litorale (Ström, 1762) and the tagmosis of the body of Pantopoda. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 32: 349-383.
69. Walossek, D. 1999. On the Cambrian diversity of Crustacea. In F. R. Schram and J. C. von Vaupel Klein (eds.). Crustaceans and the Biodiversity Crisis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Crustacean Congress. Brill, Leiden, Boston, pp. 3-27.
70. Walossek, D., and Müller, K. J. 1998. Early arthropod phylogeny in light of the Cambrian "Orsten" fossils. In G. D. Edgecombe (ed.). Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 185-231.
71. Waloszek, D. 2003. Cambrian "Orsten"-type preserved arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea. In A. Legakis, S. Sfenthourakis, R. Polymeni, and M. Theealou-Legaki (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Zoology. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Moscow, pp. 69-87.
72. Wegerhoff, R., and Breidbach, O. 1995. Comparative aspects of the chelicerate nervous system. In O. Breidbach and W. Kutsch (eds.). The Nervous Systems of Invertebrates: An Evolutionary and Comparative Approach. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin, pp. 159-180.
73. Westheide, W., and Rieger, R. 1996. Spezielle Zoologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, New York.
74. Whitington, P. M. 1996. Evolution of neuronal development in arthropods. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 7: 605-614.
75. Whitington, P. M., and Bacon, J. P. 1997. The organization and development of the arthropod ventral nerve cord: insights into arthropod relationships. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.). Arthropod Relationships. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 295-304.
76. Wildt, M., and Harzsch, S. 2002. A new look at an old visual system: structure and development of the compound eyes and optic ganglia of the brine shrimp Artemia salina Linnaeus, 1758 (Branchiopoda, Anostraca). J. Neurobiol. 52: 117-132.