Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 18, 2004, Pages 4219-4237

  Bilska Wolak, Anna O ^a   Floyd Jr , Carey E ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BIOPSY; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; DISEASES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BOOTSTRAP SAMPLING; BREAST CANCER; LIKELIHOOD RATIO;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4644272223     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barrett H H, Abbey C K and Clarkson E 1998 Some unlikely properties of the likelihood ratio and its logarithm SPIE Med. Imaging: Image Perception 3340 65-77
2. Beale E M L and Little R J A 1975 Missing values in multivariate analysis J. R. Stat. Soc. B 37 129-45
3. Bilska-Wolak A O and Floyd C E Jr 2002a Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADS(TM) lexicon Med. Phys. 29 2090-100
4. Bilska-Wolak A O and Floyd C E Jr 2002b Breast biopsy prediction using a case-based reasoning classifier for masses versus calcifications SPIE Medical Imaging; 2002 (San Diego, CA) ed Sonka M and Fitzpatrick J M pp 661-5
5. BI-RADS 1998 American College of Radiology Breast Imaging - Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3rd edn (Reston, VA: American College of Radiology)
6. Chang Y H et al 2001 Knowledge-based computer-aided detection of masses on digitized mammograms: a preliminary assessment Med. Phys. 28 455-61
7. Dixon J M and John T G 1992 Morbidity after breast biopsy for benign disease in a screened population Lancet 1 128
8. Doi K, MacMahon H, Katsuragawa S, Nishikawa R M and Jiang Y 1999 Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls Eur. J. Radiol. 31 97-109
9. Efron B and Tibshirani R J 1993 An Introduction to the Bootstrap (New York: Chapman and Hall)
10. Efron B and Tibshirani R J 1997 Improvements on cross-vilidation: the 0.632+ bootstrap method J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92 548-60
11. Egan J P 1975 Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis (New York: Academic)
12. Floyd C E Jr, Lo J Y and Tourassi G D 2000 Cased-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions Am. J. Roentgenol. 175 1347-52
13. Gavrielides M A, Lo J Y, Vargas-Voracek R and Floyd C E Jr 2000 Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms Med. Phys. 27 13-22
14. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan H, Petrick N, Helvie M and Gurcan M 2001 Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses Med. Phys. 28 2309-17
15. Hand D, Mannila H and Smyth P 2001 Principles of Data Mining (Cambridge: MIT Press)
16. Helvie M A, Ikeda D M and Adler D D 1991 Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases Am. J. Roentgenol. 157 711-4
17. Jain A K, Dubes R C and Chen C-C 1987 Bootstrap techniques for error estimation IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 9 628-33
18. Jiang Y, Metz C E and Nishikawa R M 1996 A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests Radiology 201 745-50
19. Jiang Y, Nishikawa R M, Schmidt R A, Toledano A Y and Doi K 2001 Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications Radiology 220 787-94
20. Kaye M D, Vicinanza-Adami M L and Sullivan M L 1994 Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles Radiology 192 149-51
21. Kohavi R 1995 A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman) pp 1137-43
22. Kopans D B 1992 The positive predictive value of mammography Am. J. Roentgenol. 158 521-6
23. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin R P W and Matas J 1998 On combining classifiers IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Much. Intell. 20 226-39
24. Kupinski M A, Edwards D C, Giger M L and Metz C E 2001 Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 886-99
25. Little R J A and Rubin D B 2002 Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 2nd edn (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley)
26. Lo J Y, Baker J A, Kornguth P J and Floyd C E Jr 1999 Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks Acad. Radiol. 6 10-5
27. Markey M K, Lo J Y and Floyd C E Jr 2002 Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications Radiology 223 489-93
28. McDonough R N and Whalen A D 1995 Detection of Signals in Noise (San Diego: Academic)
29. Meyer J E, Eberlein T J, Stomper P C and Sonnefeld R R 1990 Biopsy of occult breast lesions: analysis of 1261 abnormalities J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263 2341-3
30. Michaelson J et al 2002 The patterns of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences Cancer 94 37-43
31. Miller A B, Baines C J, To T and Wall C 1992 Canadian national breast screening study: J. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years Can. Med. Assoc. J. 147 1459-76
32. Morimoto T, Sasa M, Yamaguchi T, Kondo H, Akaiwa H and Sagara Y 2000 Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan Anticancer Res. 20 3689-94
33. Population by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin: 2000 (PHC-T-9): US Census Bureau, Population Division; 2000 October 3 2001
34. Scott D W 1979 On optimal and data-based histograms Biometrica 66 605-10
35. Scott D W 1992 Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization (New York: Wiley)
36. Swensson R G, King J L, Good W F and Gur D 2000 Observer variation and the performance accuracy gained by averaging ratings of abnormality Med. Phys. 27 1920-33
37. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen H H, Yen M F, Duffy S W and Smith R A 2001 Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 91 1724-31
38. Tourassi G D, Markey M K, Lo J Y and Floyd C E Jr 2001 A neural network approach to breast cancer diagnosis as a constraint satisfaction problem Med. Phys. 28 804-11
39. VanTrees H L 1968 Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory (Part I) (New York: Wiley)
40. Veldkamp W J H, Karssemeijer N, Otten J D M and Hendriks J H C L 2000 Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types Med. Phys. 27 2600-8
41. Wand M P 1995 Data-based choice of histogram bin width Australian Graduate School of Management Working Paper Series No. 95-011 University of New South Wales
42. Zheng B, Chang Y, Good W F and Gur D 2001 Performance gain computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering Med. Phys. 28 2302-8
43. Zhou X-H, Obuchowski N A and McClish D K 2002 Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine (New York: Wiley)