The EXACT description of biomedical protocols

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 13, 2008, Pages

  Soldatova, Larisa N ^a   Aubrey, Wayne ^a   King, Ross D ^a   Clare, Amanda ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; EXPERIMENT ACTIONS ONTOLOGY; FUNGAL GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; LABORATORIES;

BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY; HIGH THROUGHPUT; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

EID: 46349104705     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn156     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akada,R. et al. (2006) PCR-mediated seamless gene deletion and marker recycling in Saccharomyces cereviside. Yeast, 15;23, 399-405.
2. Amberg,D.C. et al. (2005) Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
3. Bergstra,J.A. and Klop,J.W. (1984) Process algebra for synchronous communication. Inform. Control, 60, 109-137.
4. Brazma,A. et al. (2001) Minimum information about a microarray experiment MIAME-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 4, 365-371.
5. de Boer,F.S. et al. (2007) A verification framework for agent programming with declarative goals. J. Appl. Logic, 5, 277-302.
6. Gangemi,A. et al. (2003) Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. AI Magazine, 24, 13-24.
7. Grenon,P. and Snuth,B. (2004) SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spat. Cogn. Comput., 4, 69-103.
8. Hoare,C.A.R. (1985) Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall,
9. King,R.D. et al. (2004) Functional genomics hypothesis generation by a Robot Scientist. Nature, 427, 247-252.
10. Kozaki,K. et al. (2002) Hozo: An environment for building/using ontologies based on a fundamental consideration of 'role' and 'relationship'. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp. 213-218.
11. Martens,L. et al. (2005) Pride: The proteomics identifications database. Proteomics, 5, 3537-3545.
12. Milner,R. (1980) A Calculus of Communicating Systems. Springer Verlag.
13. Noy,N. (1997) Knowledge Representation for Intelligent Information Retrieval in Experimental Sciences. Ph.D. thesis, College of Computer Science, Northeastern University, USA.
14. Rosse,C. and Mejino,J.L.V.,Jr (2003) A reference ontology for bioinformatics: The Foundational Model of Anatomy. J. Biomed. Inform. 36, 478-500.
15. Sansone,S. et al. (2007) Metabolomics standards initiative - ontology working group. work in progress. Metabolomics, 3, 249-256.
16. Schober,D. et al. (2007) Towards naming conventions for use in controlled vocabulary and ontology engineering. In Proceedings of BioOntologies SIG, ISMB07, pp. 29-32.
17. Smith,B. et al. (2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology, 6:R46, 1-15.
18. Soldatova,L.N. and King,R.D. (2005) Are the current ontologies used in biology good ontologies? Nat. Biotechnol., 9/23, 1096-1098.
19. Soldatova,L.N. and King,R.D. (2006) An ontology of scientific experiments. J. R. Soc. Interface, 3/11, 795-803.
20. Soldatova,L. et al. (2006) An ontology for a Robot Scientist. Bioinformatics (Special issue for ISMB), 22/14, e464-e471.
21. Taylor,C.F. et al. (2007) The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 887-893.
22. Treharne,H.E. and Schneider,S. (2002) Communicating B machines. In Z82002: International Conference of Z and B Users.
23. Troquard,N. et al. (2006) Towards an ontology of agency and action: From STIT to OntoSTTT+. In International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp. 179-190.
24. van der Hoek,W. and Wooldrige,M. (2003) Towards a logic of rational agency. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 11, 133-157.
25. Whelan,K.E. and King,R.D. (2008) Using a logical model to predict the growth of yeast. BMC Bioinformatics, 9:97.
26. Whetzel,P.L. et al. (2006a) Development of FuGO: An ontology for functional genomics investigations. OMICS, 10, 199-204.
27. Whetzel,P.L. et al. (2006b) The MGED ontology: A resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 7, 866-873.