Perceptual switch rates with ambiguous structure-from-motion figures in bipolar disorder

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 275, Issue 1645, 2008, Pages 1839-1848

  Krug, Kristine ^a   Brunskill, Emma ^a,b   Scarna, Antonina ^a,c   Goodwin, Guy M ^a   Parker, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bistable figures; Decision making; Extrastriate visual cortex; Perception; Rivalry; Visual neuroscience

Indexed keywords

LYSERGIDE;

DECISION MAKING; PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIPOLAR DISORDER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERFORMANCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 46249084067     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0043     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Attneave, F. 1971 Multistability in perception. Sci. Am. 225, 63-71.
2. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. 1961 An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561-571.
3. Blake, R. & Logothetis, N. K. 2002 Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 13-21. (doi:10.1038/nrn701)
4. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V. & Gilroy, L. A. 2003 Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron 39, 869-878. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00495-1)
5. Borsellino, A., De Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S. & Bartolini, B. 1972 Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139-144. (doi:10.1007/BF00290512)
6. Bradley, D. C., Chang, G. C. & Andersen, R. A. 1998 Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature 392, 714-717. (doi:10.1038/33688)
7. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Pestman, W. R. & van den Berg, A. V. 2005 Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. J. Vis. 5, 287-298. (doi:10.1167/5.4.1)
8. Brouwer, G. J. & van Ee, R. 2006 Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics. Vision Res. 46, 3393-3402. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.016)
9. Brouwer, G. J. & van Ee, R. 2007 Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. J. Neurosci. 27, 1015-1023. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4593-06.2007)
10. Carter, O. L. & Pettigrew, J. D. 2003 A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception 32, 295-305. (doi:10.1068/p3472)
11. Dodd, J. V., Krug, K., Cumming, B. G. & Parker, A. J. 2001 Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. J. Neurosci. 21, 4809-4821.
12. George, R. W. 1936 The significance of the fluctuations experienced in observing ambiguous figures and in binocular rivalry. J. Gen. Psychol. 15, 39-61.
13. Hamilton, M. 1960 A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56-62.
14. Haynes, J.-D., Deichmann, R. & Rees, G. 2005 Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438, 496-499. (doi:10.1038/nature04169)
15. Hunt, J. & Guildford, J. 1933 Fluctuation of an ambiguous figure in dementia praecox and in manic depressive patients. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 27, 443-452. (doi:10.1037/h0071060)
16. Krug, K., Cumming, B. G. & Parker, A. J. 2004 Comparing perceptual signals of single V5/MT neurons in two binocular-depth tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1586-1596. (doi:10.1152/jn.00851.2003)
17. Lankheet, M. J. M. 2006 Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. J. Vis. 6, 304-310. (doi:10.1167/6.4.1)
18. Lee, S. H., Blake, R. & Heeger, D. 2005 Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 22-23. (doi:10.1038/nn1365)
19. Leeper, R. 1935 A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning: the development of sensory organization. J. Genet. Psychol. 46, 41-75.
20. Leopold, D. A. & Logothetis, N. K. 1996 Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379, 549-553. (doi:10.1038/379549a0)
21. Logothetis, N. K. & Schall, J. D. 1989 Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245, 761-763. (doi:10.1126/science.2772635)
22. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A. & Sheinberg, D. L. 1996 What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624. (doi:10.1038/380621a0)
23. Meng, M. & Tong, F. 2004 Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J. Vis. 4, 539-551. (doi:10.1167/4.7.2)
24. Miller, S. M., Liu, G. B., Ngo, T. T., Hooper, G., Riek, S., Carson, R. G. & Pettigrew, J. D. 2000 Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Curr. Biol. 10, 383-392. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00) 00416-4)
25. Miller, S. M., Gynther, B. D., Heslop, K. R., Liu, G. B., Mitchell, P. B., Ngo, T. T., Pettigrew, J. D. & Geffen, L. B. 2003 Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder. Psychol. Med. 33, 683-692. (doi:10.1017/S0033291703007475)
26. Nawrot, M. & Blake, R. 1991 The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Percept. Psychophys. 49, 230-244.
27. Nawrot, M. & Blake, R. 1993 On the perceptual identity of stereopsis and kinetic depth. Vision Res. 33, 1561-1571. (doi:10.1016/0042- 6989(93)90149-Q)
28. Parker, A. J. & Krug, K. 2003 Neuronal mechanisms for the perception of ambiguous stimuli. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 433-439. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00099-0)
29. Pettigrew, J. D. 2001 Searching for the switch: neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain Mind 2, 85-118. (doi:10.1023/A:1017929617197)
30. Pettigrew, J. D. & Miller, S. M. 1998 A 'sticky' interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 2141-2148. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0551)
31. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J. & Heeger, D. J. 2000 Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1153-1159. (doi:10.1038/80676)
32. Rock, I. & Mitchener, K. 1992 Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects. Perception 21, 39-45. (doi:10.1068/p210039)
33. Sengpiel, F., Blakemore, C. & Harrad, R. 1995 Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 35, 179-195. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00125-6)
34. Sheinberg, D. L. & Logothetis, N. K. 1997 The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3408-3413. (doi:10.1073/pnas.94.7.3408)
35. Sheppard, B. M. & Pettigrew, J. D. 2006 Plaid motion rivalry: correlates with binocular rivalry and positive mood state. Perception 35, 157-169. (doi:10.1068/p5395)
36. Sterzer, P. & Kleinschmidt, A. 2007 A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 323-328. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0609006104)
37. Treue, S., Husain, M. & Andersen, R. A. 1991 Human perception of structure from motion. Vision Res. 31, 59-75. (doi:10.1016/0042- 6989(91)90074-F)
38. Ukai, K., Ando, H. & Kuze, J. 2003 Binocular rivalry alternation rate declines with age. Percept. Mot. Skills 97, 393-397.
39. van Ee, R. 2005 Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Res. 45, 29-40. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039)
40. van Ee, R., Noest, A. J., Brascamp, J. W. & van den Berg, A. V. 2006 Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: means do not make the difference. Vision Res. 46, 3129-3141. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.017)
41. Wallach, H. & O'Connell, D. N. 1953 The kinetic depth effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 45, 205-217. (doi:10.1037/h0056880)
42. Wheatstone, C. 1838 On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 128, 371-394. (doi:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019)
43. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R. & Lee, S. H. 2001 Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412, 907-910. (doi:10.1038/35091066)
44. Windmann, S., Wehrmann, M., Calabrese, P. & Güntürkün, O. 2006 Role of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control over bistable vision. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 456-471. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18. 3.456)
45. Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E. & Meyer, D. A. 1978 A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br. J. Psychiatry 133, 429-435.
46. Zaroff, C. M., Knutelska, M. & Frumkes, T. E. 2003 Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. Invest. Ophthamol. Vis. Sci. 44, 891-900. (doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0361)
47. Zhou, Y. H., Gao, J. B., White, K. D., Merk, I. & Yao, K. 2004 Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biol. Cybern. 90, 256-263. (doi:10.1007/s00422-004-0472-8)