What is the scope for the interpretation of dignity in research involving human subjects?

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 191-208

  Burns, Lawrence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dignity; Human subjects research; Humanity; Interpretation; Moral community; Nordenfelt; Policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MORALITY; POLICY; RESEARCH ETHICS; SELF CONCEPT;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; MORALS; PUBLIC POLICY; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 46149111447     PISSN: 13867423     EISSN: 15728633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-007-9107-x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baylis F., J.S. Robert: 2003, Crossing Species Boundaries. American Journal of Bioethics 3(3), 1-13
2. Beauchamp T., J. Childress: 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press
3. Bostrum N.: 2005, In Defence of Posthuman Dignity. Bioethics 19(3), 202-214
4. Burns L.: 2007, Gunther von Hagens' Bodyworlds: Selling Beautiful Education. American Journal of Bioethics 7(4), 12-23.
5. Burns, L., M. Lanoix, R. Melnychuk and B. Pauly: 2007, 'Race, Science and a Novel: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue', Developing World Bioethics (Online Early). doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00195.x
6. Carr, D.: 1991. Educating the Virtues: An Essay on the Philosophical Psychology of Moral Development and Education. London: Routledge
7. Caulfield T., R. Brownsword: 2005, Human Dignity: A Guide to Policy Making in the Biotechnology Era?. Nature Reviews Genetics 7, 72-76
8. Chochinov H.M.: 2002, Dignity-conserving Care. JAMA 287(17), 2253-2260
9. Coward H., P. Ratanakul: 1998, A Cross-Cultural Dialogue on Health Care Ethics. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press
10. Edgar A.: 2004, A Response to Nordenfelt's "The Varieties of Dignity". Health Care Analysis 12(2), 83-89
11. Fukuyama F. 2002, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.
12. Gallagher A.: 2004, Dignity and Respect for Dignity - Two Key Health Professional Values: Implications for Nursing Practice. Nursing Ethics 11, 587-599
13. Gewirth A.: 1998, Self-fulfillment. Princeton: Princeton University. Press.
14. Habermas J.: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. In: C. Lenhardt, S.W. Nicholsen (eds.), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press
15. Habermas J.: 2003, The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press
16. Hagendijk R., A. Irwin: 2006, Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe. Minerva 44, 167-184
17. Häyry M.: 2004, Another Look at Dignity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13, 7-14
18. Horton R.: 2004, Rediscovering Human Dignity. The Lancet 364 (9439), 1081-1085
19. Jonsen A., S. Toulmin: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Los Angeles: University of California Press
20. Kant I.: 1996, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. In: M.J. Gregor (ed.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kass L.: 1998, The Wisdom of Repugnance. In: L. Kass, J.Q. Wilson (eds.), The Ethics of Human Cloning. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
22. Kaufert, J., K.C. Glass, W.L. Freeman and L. LaBine: 2004, Background Paper on Issues of Group, Community, or First Nation Consent in Research. Commissioned for the Aboriginal Ethics Policy Development Project by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Institute for Aboriginal People' Health. Available at:
23. Macklin R.: 2003, Dignity is a Useless Concept. BMJ 327, 1419-1420
24. Misak C.: 2000, Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. New York: Routledge
25. Müller-Hill B.: 2001, Genetics of Susceptibility to Tuberculosis: Mengele's Experiments in Auschwitz. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 631-634
26. Nencini P.: 2004, The Shaman and the Rave Party: Social Pharmacology of Ecstasy. Substance Use and Misuse 37, 923-939
27. Nordenfelt L.: 2003, DigAity of the elderly: an introduction. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6, 199-201
28. Nordenfelt L.: 2004, The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analysis 12(2), 69-81
29. Nussbaum M.: 2006, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. The Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press
30. Pellegrino E.: 2005, Some Things Ought Never Be Done: Moral Absolutes in Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26, 469-486
31. Pluhar E.B.: 1995, Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Nonhuman Animals. Durham: Duke University Press
32. Prusak B.G.: 2005, Rethinking "Liberal Eugenics": Reflections and Questions on Habermas on Bioethics. Hastings Center Report 35(6), 31-42.
33. Pullman D.: 2001, Universalism, Particularism, and the Ethics of Dignity. Christian Bioethics 7(3), 333-358
34. Rendtorff J.D.: 2002, Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability - Towards a Foundation of Bioethics and Biolaw. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5(3), 235-244
35. Schachter O.: 1983, Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. The American Journal of International Law 77(4), 848-854
36. Seidelman W.: 2000, The Legacy of Academic Medicine and Human Exploitation in the Third Reich. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43(3), 325-334
37. Shultziner, D.: 2003, 'Human Dignity - Functions and Meanings', Global Jurist Topics 3(3): Article 3. Available at:
38. Singer, P.: 2003, 'Animal Liberation at 30', The New York Review of Books 50(8)
39. Söderberg A., F. Gilje, A. Norberg: 1997, Dignity in Situations of Ethical Difficulty in Intensive Care. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 13, 135-144
40. Ullrich, D.: 2003, 'Concurring Visions: Human Dignity in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany', Global Jurist Frontiers. 3(1): Article 1
41. Canada, Department of Justice: 2004, Assisted Human Reproduction Act, c.2. Available at:
42. Canada, Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: 1993, Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing.
43. Canada, Standing Committee on Health: 2001, Assisted Human Reproduction: Building Families. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services - Canada Publishing.
44. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: 1998, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. (With 2000, 2002 and 2005 amendments). Available at:
45. Canadian Institutes of Health Research: 2006, Updated Guidelines for Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research, June 28, 2006. Available at:
46. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and WHO: 1982, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. (With 1993 and 2002 amendments.) Geneva: WHO. Available at:
47. Department of Health and Human Services: 1982, 45 CFR 46 (Revised 2005). Available at:
48. Health Canada: 2006, A Chronology of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Available at:
49. International Military Tribunal: 1949, 'Nuremberg Code', in: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law 10(2). Washington: US Government Printing Office, pp. 181-182
50. Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration): 1999, 1 S.C.R. 497
51. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1979, The Belmont Report. Available at:
52. United Nations: 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights
53. UNESCO: 1997, Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights. Available at:
54. World Medical Association: 1964, Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Including Human Subjects. (With 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000, 2002, and 2004 amendments.) Availabe at: