Retention of screened women in the Manitoba breast screening program

Canadian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 216-220

  Decker, Kathleen M ^a  

^a CANCERCARE MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Retention; Screening

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANADA; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MANITOBA; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 46149107055     PISSN: 00084263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03405477     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995;273:149-54.
2. Health Canada. Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada. 1999 and 2000 report. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2003.
3. Evaluation Indicators Working Group, Health Canada. Guidlines for monitoring breast screening program performance. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2002.
4. Decker KM, Harrison M, Watters K. Manitoba Breast Screening Program Biennial Report, 2004-2006. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Breast Screening Program, CancerCare Manitoba, 2007.
5. Gail MH, Costanino JP. Validating and improving models for projecting absolute risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(5):334-35.
6. SAS version 9.1. Carey, NC: SAS Institute, 2002.
7. Johnson MM, Hislop TG, Kan L, Coldman AJ, Lai A. Compliance with the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: Will she return? Can J Public Health 1996;87(3):176-80.
8. Hofvind SS, Wang H, Thoresen S. The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Re-attendance related to the woman's experiences, intentions, and previous screening result. Cancer Causes and Control 2003; 14(4):391-98.
9. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Sjoden PO. The influence of false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1730-37.
10. Burman ML, Taplin SH, Herta DF, Elmore JG. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med 1999;131(1):1-6.
11. Pisano ED, Earp J, Schell M, Vokaty K, Denham A. Screening behaviour of women after a false-positive mammogram. Radiology 1998;208:245-49.
12. Decker K, Harrison M, Tate R. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba Breast Screening Program. J Prev Med 1999;29:22-27.
13. Marc DeSilva, Manitoba Health. Personal Communication. Winnipeg, 2006.
14. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, Balshem A, Lustbader E, Heggan T, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85(13):1074-80.
15. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33(1):29-53.
16. O'Byrne A-M, Kavanagh AM, Ugoni A, Diver F. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme. J Med Screening 2000;7:190-94.
17. Elwood M, NcNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle TC. Once is enough: Why some women do not continue to participate in a breast screening programme. N Z Med J 1998; 111 (1066): 180-83.