Multisensory enhancement of command displays for unusual attitude recovery

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 255-267

  Wickens, Christopher D ^a,d   Small, Ronald L ^a   Andre, Terence ^b   Bagnall, Timothy ^a   Brenaman, Chris ^c  

^a Alion Science MA and D Operations   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d Alion/MA and D Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949107929     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508410802073491     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Air Force. (2001). Flying safety. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Andre, A. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1992). Compatibility and consistency in display-control systems: Implications for aircraft decision aid design. Human Factors, 34, 639-653.
3. Andre, A. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1995, October). When users want what's not best for them: A review of performance-preference dissociations. Ergonomics in Design, 10-13.
4. Begault, D. R., & Wenzel, E. M. (1992). Techniques and applications for binaural sound manipulation in human-machine interfaces. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 23-38.
5. Braithwaite, M., Ercoline, W. R., & Brown, L. (2004). Spatial disorientation instruction. In F. H. Previc & W. R. Ercoline (Eds.), Spatial disorientation in aviation (pp. 323-378). Reston, VA: AIAA.
6. Brickman, B. J., Hettinger, L. J., & Haas, M. W. (2000). Multisensory interface design for complex task domains. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 273-290.
7. Calhoun, G. L., Draper, M., Ruff, H., and Fontejon, J. (2002). Utility of a tactile display for cueing faults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th annual meeting (pp. 2144-2148). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8. Erickson, L., van Erp, J., et al. (2006). Vibrotactile and visual threat cuing with high G threat intercept in dynamic flight simulation. In Proceedings of the 50th conference of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9. Ho, C. Y., & Sarter, N. B. (2004). Supporting synchronous distributed communications and coordination through multimodal information exchange. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
10. Holmes, S. R., Bunting, A., Brown, D. L., Hiatt, K. L., Braithwaite, M. G., & Harrigan, M. J. (2003). Survey of spatial disorientation in military pilots and navigators. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 74, 957-965.
11. Kovalenko, P. A. (1991). Psychological aspects of pilot spatial orientation. ICAO Journal, 46(3), 18-23.
12. McGuirl, J., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Presenting in-flight icing information: A comparison of visual and tactile cues. In Proceedings of the 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reston, VA: AIAA.
13. Newman, R. L., & Haworth, L. A. (2004). Flight displays II: Head-up and helmet-mounted displays. In F. H. Previc & W. R. Ercoline (Eds.), Spatial disorientation in aviation (pp. 451-507). Reston, VA: AIAA.
14. Previc, F. H., & Ercoline, W. R. (1999). The "outside-in" attitude indicator revisited. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 377-401.
15. Reising, J., Liggett, K. K., & Munns, R. C. (1999). Controls displays and workplace design. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Rupert, A. H. (2000). Tactile situation awareness system: Proprioception prostheses for sensory deficiencies. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 71, A92-A99.
17. Sarter, N. (2007). Multiple resource theory as a basis of multimodal interface design. In A. Kramer, A. Kirlik, & D. Wiegmann (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Sarter, N., & Schroeder, B. (2001). Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: The case of in-flight icing. Human Factors, 43, 573-583.
19. Sklar, A. F., & Sarter, N. B. (1999). Good vibrations: The use of tactile feedback to support mode awareness on advanced technology aircraft. Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
20. Sundstrom, J. N. (2004). Flight conditions leading to Class A spatial disorientation mishaps in U.S. Air Force fighter operations: FY93-02 (Master's thesis). Washington, DC: Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
21. Van Erp, J. (2007). Tactile displays for navigation and orientation. Leiden, The Netherlands: Mostert & Van Onderen.
22. Van Erp, J., Groen, E., Bos, J., & Van Veen, H. (2006). A tactile cockpit instrument supports the control of self-motion during spatial disorientation. Human Factors, 48, 219-228.
23. Van Erp, J., Veltman, J. A., & Van Veen, H. A. (2003). A tactile cockpit instrument to support altitude control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
24. Wickens, C. D. (2003). Aviation displays. In P. Tsang & M. Vidulich (Eds.), Principles and practices of aviation psychology (pp. 147-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Wickens, C. D., Self, B. P., Andre, T. S., Reynolds, T. J., & Small, R. L. (2007). Unusual attitude recoveries with a spatial disorientation icon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 17, 153-165.
27. Wiegmann, D., Faaborg, T., Boquet, A., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., & Shappell, S. (2004). Human error and general aviation accidents: A comprehensive fine-grained analysis using HFACS (DOT/FAA/AM Tech. Rep. No. AM-05/24). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.