The "outside-in" attitude display concept revisited

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 377-401

  Previc, Fred H ^a,c   Ercoline, William R ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

^c TASC Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033483192     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0904_5     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adams, E. C. (1993). Head-up displays vs. helmet-mounted displays: The issues. In SID international symposium digest of technical papers (Vol. 24, pp. 429-432). Playa del Rey, CA: Society for Information Display.
2. Andre, A. D., Wickens, C. D., Moorman, L., & Boschelli, M. M. (1991). Display formatting techniques for improving situation awareness in the aircraft cockpit. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 205-218.
3. Angelaki, D. E., & Hess, B. J. M. (1994). Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys: I. Vestibuloocular reflex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 1222-1249.
4. Bellenkes, A., Bason, R., & Yacavone, D. O. (1992). Spatial disorientation in naval aviation mishaps: A review of Class A incidents from 1980 through 1989. A viation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 63, 128-131.
5. Beringer, D. B., Williges, R. C., & Roscoe, S. N. (1975). The transition of experienced pilots to a frequency-separated aircraft attitude display. Human Factors, 17, 401-414.
6. Brandt, T., Wist, E. R., & Dichgans, J. (1975). Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 307-314.
7. Braune, R. J. (1996). Requirements development for flight systems design. In K. W. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the AGATE human factors workshop on flight deck design (Tech. Memo. No. AAM-500-96-12, pp. 1-2). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeronautics Institute.
8. Browne, R. C. (1954). Figure and ground in a two dimensional display. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 462-467.
9. Collins, D. L., & Harrison, G. ( 1995). Spatial disorientation episodes among F-15C pilots during Operation Desert Storm. Journal of Vestibular Research, 5, 405-410.
10. Davy, E. C., & Selcon, S. J. (1997). A comparison of attitude information for helmet-mounted displays. In J. Bares et al. (Eds.), SPIE conference proceedings (Vol. 2949, pp. 151-162). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
11. Delorme, A., & Martin, C. (1986). Roles of retinal periphery and depth periphery in linear vection and visual control of standing in humans. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 176-187.
12. DeVilbiss, C. A., & Sipes, W. E. (1995). Effect of arc segmented attitude reference symbology on a helmet-mounted display during an unusual attitude recovery task. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), SPIE conference proceedings (Vol. 2465, pp. 255-262). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
13. Dunlap & Associates, Inc. (1955). Pilot performance with two different attitude displays (Rep. No. DTIC No. AD-082 868). Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research.
14. Ercoline, W. R., & DeVilbiss, C. A. (1995). Effects on spatial orientation (attitude awareness) when flight path information is incorporated with attitude information. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 66, 492.
15. Ercoline, W. R., DeVilbiss, C. A., & Lyons, T. J. (1994). Trends in USAF spatial disorientation accidents-1958-1992. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), SPIE conference proceedings (Vol. 2218, pp. 257-260). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
16. Fitts, P. M., & Jones, R. E. (1947). Psychological aspects of instrument display: 1. Analysis of 270 "pilot-error" experiences in reading and interpreting aircraft instruments (Memo. Rep. No. TSEAA-694-12A). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Materiel Command.
17. Fogel, L. J. (1959). A new concept: The kinalog display. Human Factors, 1, 30-37.
18. Gardner, J. F. ( 1954). Speed and accuracy of response to five different attitude indicators (WADC Tech. Rep. No. 54-236). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Wright Air Development Center.
19. Gardner, J. F., & Lacey, R. J. (1954). An experimental comparison of five different attitude indicators (WADC Tech. Rep. No. 54-32). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Wright Air Development Center.
20. Gieselman, E. E., & Osgood, R. K. (1994). Utility of off-boresight helmet-mounted symbology during a high-angle target acquisition task. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), SPIE conference proceedings (Vol. 2218, pp. 328-338). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
21. Gillingham, K. K. (1992). The spatial disorientation problem in the United States Air Force. Journal of Vestibular Research, 2, 297-306.
22. Gillingham, K. K., & Wolfe, J. W. (1985). Spatial orientation in flight (USAFSAM-TR-85-31). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.
23. Grether, W. F. (1947). A discussion of pictorial versus symbolic aircraft instrument displays (Memo. Rep. No. TSEAA-694-8B). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Materiel Command.
24. Harvey, H. (1993, June 6). They didn't have to die. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, p. A-12.
25. Hasbrook, A. H. (1973). In-flight performance of civilian pilots using moving-aircraft and moving-horizon attitude indicators (Rep. No. FAA-AM-73-9). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
26. Haskell, I. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Design and evaluation of three-dimensional displays for aviation: A consideration of the critical variables. In SID international symposium digest of technical papers (Vol. 19, pp. 356-359). Playa del Rey, CA: Society for Information Display.
27. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
28. Ince, F., Williges, R. C., & Roscoe, S. N. (1975). Aircraft simulator motion and the order of merit of flight attitude and steering guidance displays. Human Factors, 17, 388-400.
29. Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 179-187.
30. James, M. (1992). The ambient attitude indicator (IAM Rep. No. 719). Farnborough, England: Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine.
31. Johnson, S. L., & Roscoe, S. N. (1972). What moves, the airplane or the world? Human Factors, 14, 107-129.
32. Jones, D. R., Abbott, T. S., & Burley, J. R., II. (1992). Evaluation of conformal and body-axis attitude information for spatial awareness. In T. M. Lippert (Ed.), SPIE conference proceedings (Vol. 1695, pp. 146-153). Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
33. Kelley, C. R., de Groot, S., & Bowen, H. M. (1961). Relative motion III: Some relative motion problems in aviation (Rep. No. NAVTRADEVCEN 316-2). Pott Washington, NY: U.S. Naval Training Device Center.
34. Kirkham, W. R., Collins, W. E., Grape. P. M., Simpson, J. M., & Wallace, T. F. (1978). Spatial disorientation in general aviation accidents. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 49, 1080-1086.
35. Kohler, I. (1964). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world (H. Fiss, Trans.). New York: International Universities Press.
36. Kovalenko, P. A. (1991). Psychological aspects of pilot spatial orientation. ICAO Journal, 46, 18-23.
37. Loucks, R. B. (1947). An experimental evaluation of the interpretability of various types of aircraft attitude indicators. In P. M. Fitts (Ed.), Psychological research on equipment design (Aviation Psychology Research Rep. No. 19, pp. 111-146). Washington, DC: U.S. Army Air Forces.
38. Malcolm, R. (1984). Pilot disorientation and the use of a peripheral vision display. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 55, 231-238.
39. Matheny, W. G., Dougherty, D. J., & Willis, J. M. (1963). Relative motion of elements in instrument displays. Aerospace Medicine, 34, 1041-1046.
40. Mortimer, R. G. (1995). Spatial disorientation in fixed-wing general aviation accidents. In R. S. Jensen & L. A. Rakovan (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on aviation psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1307-1311). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
41. Navathe, P. D., & Singh, B. (1994). Prevalence of spatial disorientation in Indian Air Force crew. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 1082-1085.
42. Nystrom, M. (1993). Is picture memory wide-angle? Psychological Research Bulletin, 33, 1-16.
43. Ocker, W. C., & Crane, C. J. (1932). Blind flight in theory and practice. San Antonio, TX: Naylor.
44. Ohmi, M., Howard, I. P., & Landolt, J. P. (1987). Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception, 16, 17-22.
45. Osgood, R. K., & Venturino, M. (1990). Information representations for aircraft attitude displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting (Vol. 2, pp. 1542-1545). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
46. Patterson, F. R., Cacioppo, A. J., Gallimore, J. J., Hinman, G. E., & Nalepka, J. P. (1997). Aviation spatial orientation in relationship to head position and attitude interpretation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 68, 463-471.
47. Pongratz, H., Vaic, H., & Reinecke, M., Ercoline, W. R., & Cohen, D. (1999). Outside-in vs. inside-out: Flight problems caused by different flight attitude indicators. SAFE Journal, 29, 7-11.
48. Ponomarenko, V. A., Lapa, V. V., & Lemeshchenko, N. A. (1990). Proyektirovaniya indikatsii prostranstvennogo polozheniya samolyota [Psychological foundation of aircraft's spatial attitude indication design]. Psykhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 11, 37-46.
49. Poppen, J. R. (1936). Equilibratory functions in instrument flying. Journal of Aviation Medicine, 6, 148-160.
50. Previc, F. H. (1989). Towards a physiologically based HUD symbology (Rep. No. USAFSAM-TR-88-25). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.
51. Previc, F. H. (1994). Inferring the visual reference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 324-325.
52. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-164.
53. Previc, F. H., & Donnelly, M. (1993). The effects of visual depth and eccentricity on manual bias, induced motion, and vection. Perception, 22, 929-945.
54. Previc, F. H., Varner, D. C., & Gillingham, K. K. (1992). Visual scene effects on the somatogravic illusion. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 63, 1060-1064.
55. Reising, J. M., Liggett, K. K., & Hartsock, D. C. (1996). Multi-function displays: Lessons learned. In K. W. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the AGATE human factors workshop on flight deck design (TM-AAM-500-96-12, pp. 30-35). Oklahoma City, OK: Human Factors Research Laboratory.
56. Roscoe, S. N. (1968). Airborne displays for flight and navigation. Human Factors, 10, 321-332.
57. Roscoe, S. N. (1997). Horizon control reversals and the graveyard spiral. Cseriac Gateway, 7, 1-4.
58. Roscoe, S. N., Hasler, S. G., & Dougherty, D. J. (1966). Flight by periscope: Making takeoffs and landings: The influence of image magnification, practice, and various conditions of flight. Human Factors, 8, 13-40.
59. Roscoe, S. N., & Williges, R. C. (1975). Motion relationships in aircraft attitude and guidance displays: A flight experiment. Human Factors, 17, 374-387.
60. Sauvan, X. M., & Peterhans, E. (1995). Neural integration of visual information and direction of gravity in prestriate cortex of the alert monkey. In T. Mergner & F. Hlavacka (Eds.), Multisensory control of posture (pp. 43-49). New York: Plenum.
61. Schofield, B. L. (1984). Early Air Force Flight Test Center (AFFTC) experience with peripheral vision horizon displays (PVHD). In Peripheral vision horizon display (PVHD) (NASA Conference Publication No. 2306, pp. 113-115). Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
62. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 191, 952-954.
63. Taube, J. S., Goodridge, J. P., Golob, E. J., Dudchenko, P. A., & Stackman, R. W. (1996). Processing the head direction cell signal: A review and commentary. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 477-486.
64. Taylor, R. M., & Selcon, S. J. (1990). Cognitive quality and situational awareness with advanced aircraft attitude displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 26-30). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
65. USAF Scientific Advisory Board. (1995). New world vistas: Air and space power for the 21st century (Summary volume). Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force.
66. U.S. Army Air Forces. (1943). Basic instrument flying without radio aids (Tech. Order No. 30-11A-1). Chicago: Marshall-White.
67. Warrick, M. J. (1947). Direction of movement in the use of control knobs to position visual indicators. In P. M. Fitts (Ed.), Psychological research on equipment design (Aviation Psychology Research Rep. No. 19, pp. 137-146). Washington, DC: U.S. Army Air Forces.
68. Weinstein, L. F., Gillingham, K. K., & Ercoline, W. R. (1994). United States Air Force head-up display control and performance symbology evaluations. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, A20-A30.
69. Wickens, C. D., Liang, C.-C., Prevett, T., & Olmos, O.(1996). Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. Intenational Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241-271.
70. Worringham, C. J., & Beringer, D. B. (1989). Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance. Ergonomics, 32, 387-399.