Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 403-409

  Salzano, E ^a   Iervolino, I ^b   Fabbrocino, G ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Domino effects; Earthquake; Fragility; Probit analysis; Quantitative risk analysis; Storage tank

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS;

LOSS PREVENTION;

EARTHQUAKE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STORAGE TANK;

ACCIDENT; EARTHQUAKE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC HAZARD; STORAGE TANK;

EID: 0042924321     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-4230(03)00052-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. API 620-American Petroleum Institute (1998). Design and construction of large, welded, low-pressure storage tanks. Washington, DC, USA.
2. API 650-American Petroleum Institute (1998). Welded steel tanks for oil storage. Washington, DC, USA.
3. AWWA D100-96-American Water Works Association (1996). Welded steel tanks for water storage. Denver, CO, USA.
4. AWWA D103-97-American Water Works Association (1997). Factory-coated bolted steel tanks for water storage. USA.
5. Ballantyne D. Crouse C. Reliability and restoration of water supply systems for fire suppression and drinking following earthquakes 1997 National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST GCR 97-720
6. Bottelberghs P.H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in The Netherlands Journal of Hazardous Materials 71 2000 59-84
7. Brown K. Rugar P. Davis C. Rulla T. Seismic performance of Los Angeles water tanks, lifeline earthquake engineering Proceedings of the 4th US conference, ASCE, TCLEE monograph No. 6, San Francisco 1995
8. CCPS-Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1989). Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
9. CCPS-Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1994). Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of VCEs, flash fires and BLEVEs. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
10. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures 1995 Prentice Hall
11. Clough R.W. Penzien J. Dynamics of structures 1982 McGraw-Hill New York
12. Cooper T.W. A study of the performance of petroleum storage tanks during earthquakes, 1933-1995 1997 National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD
13. Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 1968 1503-1606
14. Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 10/13, Brussels.
15. Eidinger, J.M. (2001). Earthquakeic fragility formulation for water systems, ASCE-TCLEE.
16. Eurocode 8 (1998). Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 4: silos, tanks and pipelines, UNI ENV 1998.
17. Fabbrocino G. Iervolino I. Manfredi G. Structural issues in seismic risk assessment of existing oil storage tanks Proceedings of 3rd international conference on computer simulation in risk analysis and hazard mitigation, 19-21 June 2002 Sintra, Portugal 2002
18. Finney D.J. Probit analysis 1971 Cambridge University Press
19. Haroun M. Behaviour of unanchored oil storage tanks: Imperial Valley Earthquake Journal of Technical Topics in Civil Engineering, ASCE 109 1983 1
20. Haroun M.A. Implications of recent nonlinear analyses on earthquakeic standards of liquid storage tanks Proceedings of 5th US conference on lifeline earthquake engineering, TCLEE monograph No. 16, ASCE Seattle, USA 1999
21. HAZUS (1997). Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. National Institute of Building Sciences, prepared by Risk Management Solutions, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
22. HSE-Health Safety Executive (1978). Canvey report: an investigation of potential hazards from operation in the Canvey Island/Turrock area, London, UK, Stationery Office.
23. Iervolino I. Fabbrocino G. Manfredi G. Contribution to integrated risk assessment of industrial facilities: the case of oil storage tanks in seismic regions GNDT-MAE-SAFERR conference on seismic risk in urban areas, Erice, Italy 2003
24. Kirchsteiger C. On the use of probabilistic and deterministic methods in risk analysis Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 12 5 1999 399-419
25. Lees F.P. Loss prevention in the process industries 2nd ed. 1996 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford, UK
26. Malhotra P.K. Wenk T. Wieland M. Simple procedure for earthquakeic analysis of liquid-storage tanks Structural Engineering International 3 2000
27. Martin R.J. Ali Reza A. Anderson L.W. What is an explosion? A case history of an investigation for the insurance Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 13 2000 491-497
28. O'Rourke, M.J., Eeri, M., - So, P. (2000). Seismic fragility curves for on-grade steel tanks. Earthquake spectra, vol. 16, NY, USA.
29. Rijnmond Public Authority (1982). Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study, Reidel Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
30. Salzano E. Marra F.S. Russo G. Lee J.H.S. Numerical simulation of turbulent gas flames in tubes Journal of Hazardous Materials 95 3 2002 233-247
31. Spadoni G. Egidi D. Contini S. Through ARIPAR-GIS the quantified area risk analysis supports land-use planning activities Journal of Hazardous Materials 71 2000 423-437
32. Vilchez J.A. Montiel H. Casal J. Arnaldos J. Analytical expression for the calculation of damage percentage using the probit methodology Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 14 2001 193-197
33. Wald D.J. Quitoriano V. Heaton T.H. Kanamori H. Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California Earthquake Spectra 15 1999 557