Phase diagram of interacting composite fermions in the bilayer v = 2/3 quantum Hall effect

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2002, Pages

  Kumada, N ^a   Terasawa, D ^a   Shimoda, Y ^a   Azuhata, H ^a   Sawada, A ^a   Ezawa, Z F ^a   Muraki, K ^b   Saku, T ^b   Hirayama, Y ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NTT Basic Research Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTRON TUNNELING; HALL EFFECT; MAGNETIC HYSTERESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MULTILAYERS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; QUANTUM THEORY; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

COMPOSITE FERMIONS; MAGNETOTRANSPORT; QUANTUM HALL EFFECT; TUNNELING GAP;

FERMIONS;

EID: 45849154923     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J.K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989).
2. B.I. Halperin, P.A. Lee, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7312 (1993).
3. R.R. Du et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2944 (1993).
4. R.R. Du et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3926 (1995).
5. I.V. Kukushkin, K.v. Klitzing, and K. Eberl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3665 (1999).
6. I.V. Kukushkin et al., Nature (London) 415, 409 (2002).
7. K. Park and J.K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4237 (1998).
8. S.Q. Murphy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 728 (1994).
9. A. Sawada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4534 (1998).
10. K. Muraki et al., Solid State Commun. 112, 625 (1999).
11. T.S. Lay et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, R7092 (1997).
12. Although the width of the hysteresis depends on the field sweep rate and the current, the conditions used are suitable to judge the existence or absence of the hysteresis.
13. Some gaps are in the order of 10 mK, which is the same order of the experimental temperature. We have confirmed that qualitatively the same results are obtained from the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula valid also for small energy gaps. [D.R. Leadley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4246 (1997)].
14. J.P. Eisenstein et al., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7910 (1990).
15. L.W. Engel et al., Phys. Rev. B 45, 3418 (1992).
16. J. Hu and A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12 554 (1992).
17. -2 is hampered by the reduced mobility.
18. I.V. Kukushkin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3688 (2000).
19. This contrasts with the phase transition in bilayer ν = 2 [9], which can be understood in a mean-field picture as a spin-unpolarized to polarized transition driven by the intralayer/interlayer exchange energy.
20. G.S. Boebinger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1793 (1990).
21. ∥ seems to be consistent with this idea [8]. This, however, requires further investigations.
22. A.H. MacDonald, P.M. Platzman, and G.S. Boebinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 775 (1990).
23. L. Brey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 903 (1990).
24. J. Eom et al., Science 289, 2320 (2000).
25. J.H. Smet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2412 (2001).
26. S. Kronmüller et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2526 (1998).
27. J.H. Smet et al., Nature (London) 415, 281 (2002).
28. K. Hashimoto et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 176601 (2002).