Spaces of speech and places of performance: An outline of a geography of science approach to embryonic stem cell research and diabetes

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-173

  Wainwright, Steven P ^a   Williams, Clare ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Embryonic stem cells; Geography; Science studies

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIABETES MELLITUS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 45849149679     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: 14699915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636770802077116     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Barnes, T.J., 2001. In the beginning was economic geography: a science studies approach to disciplinary history. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 69-95.
2. Bonner-Weir, S. and Weir, G.C., 2005. New sources of pancreatic beta-cells. Nature Biotechnology, 23, 857-886.
3. Cribb, A., et al., forthcoming. Towards the applied: the construction of ethical positions in stem cell translational research. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy.
4. Dalton, R., 2005. California prepares to roll out stem-cell funding. Nature, 7060, 800-801.
5. Daston, L., 1995. The moral economy of science. Osiris, 10, 2-24.
6. Gaglia, J.L., Shapiro, A.M.J., andWeir, G.C., 2005. Islet transplantation: progress and challenge. Archives of Medical Research, 36, 273-280.
7. Gieryn, T.F., 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago University Press.
8. Glasner, P., 1998. Patrolling the boundaries or tracing the contours: cartographic metaphors and the human genome project. In: P. Wheale, R. von Schomberg, R., and P. Glasner, eds. The social management of genetic engineering. Aldershot: Ashgate, 29-44.
9. Henke, C.R. and Gieryn, T.F., 2008. Sites of scientific practice: the enduring imporatance of place. In: E.J. Hackett, et al., eds. The handbook of science and technology studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 353-376.
10. Johnstone, R.J. and Sideway, J.D., 2004. Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945. 6th ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
11. Latour, B., 1988. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.
13. Livingstone, D.N., 2002. Science, space and hermeneutics. The Hettner Lectures 2001. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.
14. Livingstone, D.N., 2003. Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago University Press.
15. Livingstone, D.N., 2005a. Science, text and space: thoughts on the geography of reading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (4), 391-401.
16. Livingstone, D.N., 2005b. Text, talk and testimony: geographical reflections on scientific habits. British Journal for the History of Science, 38, 93-100.
17. Lumelsky, N., et al., 2001. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to insulin-secreting structures similar to pancreatic islets. Science, 292, 1389-1394.
18. Michael, M., et al., 2007. From core set to assemblage: on the dynamics of exclusion and inclusion in the failure to derive beta cells from embryonic stem cells. Science Studies, 20 (1), 5-25.
19. Mooney, C., 2005. The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
20. Narushima, M., et al., 2005. A human β-cell line for transplantation therapy to control type 1 diabetes. Nature Biotechnology, 23, 1274-1282.
21. Popper, K., 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Unwin Hyman.
22. Powell, R.C., 2007. Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 309-329.
23. Salter, B., 2007. Bioethics and the global moral economy: the cultural politics of human embryonic stem cell science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32 (5), 1-28.
24. Scott, C.T., 2006. Stem cell now: from the experiment that shook the world to the new politics of life. New York: Pi Press.
25. Shapin, S., 1998. Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23, 1-8.
26. Shapin, S. and Shaffer, S., 1985. Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton University Press.
27. Shapiro, A.M.J., et al., 2000. Islet transplantation in seven patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regime. New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 230-238.
28. Strauss, A.L., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
29. Wainwright, S.P., et al., 2006a. From bench to bedside? Biomedical scientists' expectations of stem cell science as a future therapy for diabetes. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2052-2064.
30. Wainwright, S.P., et al., 2006b. Ethical boundary work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28, 732-748.
31. Wainwright, S.P., et al., 2006c. Real science, biological bodies and stem cells: constructing images of beta cells in the biomedical science lab. Social Theory & Health, 4, 275-298.
32. Wainwright, S.P., et al., 2007. Remaking the body? Scientists' genetic discourses and practices as examples of changing expectations on embryonic stem cell therapy for diabetes. New Genetics and Society, 26, 251-268.
33. Williams, C., et al., forthcoming. Human embryos as boundary objects? Some reflections on the biomedical worlds of embryonic stem cells and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. New Genetics and Society.
34. Zimmet, P., Alberti, K.G.M.M., and Shaw, J., 2001. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature, 414, 782-787.