ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 119-126

  Miyakoshi, Makoto ^a,b   Kanayama, Noriaki ^a,b   Nomura, Michio ^c   Iidaka, Tetsuya ^d   Ohira, Hideki ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c Tokai Women's Junior College   (Japan)

^d NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angle; Face; Familiarity; N170; N250; P300; Self

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; RECOGNITION; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 45849136039     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allison T., Puce A., Spencer D., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 9 (1999) 415-430
2. Begleiter H., Porjesz B., and Wang W. Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 (1995) 41-49
3. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 (1996) 551-565
4. Berlad I., and Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 472-474
5. Bruce V., and Young A. Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77 (1986) 305-327
6. Bruce V., Valentine T., and Baddley A.D. The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 1 (1987) 109-120
7. Caharel S., Poiroux S., Bernard C., Thibaut F., Lalonde R., and Rebai M. ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition. Int. J. Neurosci. 112 (2002) 1499-1512
8. Caharel S., Courtay N., Bernard C., Lalonde R., and Rebai M. Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: an electrophysiological study. Brain Cogn. 59 (2005) 96-100
9. Delorme A., and Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 (2004) 9-21
10. Eimer M. The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 2319-2324
11. Eger E., Schweinberger S.R., Dolan R.J., and Henson R.N. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage 26 (2005) 1128-1139
12. Folmer R.L., and Yingling C.D. Auditory P3 responses to name stimuli. Brain Lang. 56 (1997) 306-311
13. Gorno-Tempini M.L., and Price C.J. Identification of famous faces and buildings. A functional neuroimaging study of semantically unique items. Brain 124 (2001) 2087-2097
14. Gorno-Tempini M.L., Price C.J., Josephs O., Vandenberghe R., Cappa S.F., Kapur N., and Frackowiak R.S.J. The neural systems sustaining face and proper name processing. Brain 121 (1998) 2103-2118
15. Gray H.M., Ambady N., Lowenthal W.T., and Deldin P. P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40 (2004) 216-224
16. Hancock P.J., Bruce V.V., and Burton A.M. Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 330-337
17. Herzmann G., Schweinberger S.R., Sommer W., and Jentzsch I. What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 688-701
18. Hill H., Schyns P.G., and Akamatsu S. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 62 (1997) 201-222
19. Jeffreys D.A., Tukmachi E.S.A., and Rockley G. Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces. Exp. Brain Res. 91 (1992) 351-362
20. Jemel B., Pisani M., Calabria M., Crommelinck M., and Bruyer R. Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 17 (2003) 431-446
21. Joyce C., and Rossion B. The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 (2005) 2613-2631
22. Keenan J.P., McCutcheon B., Freund S., Gallup Jr. G.G., Sanders G., and Pascual-Leone A. Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 1421-1425
23. Keenan J.P., Freund S., Hamilton R.H., Ganis G., and Pascual-Leone A. Hand response differences in a self-face identification task. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 1047-1053
24. Keenan J.P., Wheeler M.A., Gallup Jr. G.G., and Pascual-Leone A. Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 338-344
25. Keenan J.P., Nelson A., O'Connor M., and Pascual-Leone A. Self-recognition and the right hemisphere. Nature 409 (2001) 305
26. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
27. McCarthy G., Puce A., Belger A., and Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 9 (1999) 431-444
28. Miyakoshi M., Nomura M., and Ohira H. An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition. Brain Cogn. 63 (2007) 182-189
29. Müller H.M., and Kutas M. What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one's own name. Neuroreport 8 (1996) 221-225
30. Nessler D., Mecklinger A., and Penney T.B. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22 (2005) 265-288
31. Newell F.N., Chiroro P., and Valentine T. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 52 A (1999) 509-534
32. Ninomiya H., Onitsuka T., Chen C.H., Sato E., and Tashiro N. P300 in response to the subject's own face. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 52 (1998) 519-522
33. O'Toole A., Edelman S., and Bülthoff H.H. Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vision Res. 38 (1998) 2351-2363
34. Perrin F., Garcia-Larrea L., Mauguiere F., and Batsuji H. A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 2153-2164
35. Perrin F., Maquet P., Peigneux P., Ruby P., Degueldre C., Balteau E., Del Fiore G., Moonen G., Luxen A., and Laureys S. Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: a combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 12-19
36. Pfütze E.M., Sommer W., and Schweinberger S.R. Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychol. Aging 17 (2002) 140-160
37. Platek S.M., Keenan J.P., Gallup Jr. G.G., and Mohamed F.B. Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 19 (2004) 114-122
38. Platek S.M., Loughead J.W., Gur R.C., Busch S., Ruparel K., Phend N., Panyavin I.S., and Langleben D.D. Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27 (2006) 91-98
39. Pourtois G., Schwartz S., Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., and Vuilleumier P. View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 1214-1224
40. Puce A., Allison T., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. Cereb. Cortex 9 (1999) 445-458
41. Schweinberger S.R., Pfütze E.M., and Sommer W. Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn Mem. Cogn. 21 (1995) 722-736
42. Schweinberger S.R., Pickering E.C., Jentzsch I., Burton A.M., and Kaufmann J.M. Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 398-409
43. Schweinberger S.R., Huddy V., and Burton M. N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport 15 (2004) 1501-1505
44. Sugiura M., Watanabe J., Maeda Y., Matsue Y., Fukuda H., and Kawashima R. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 143-149
45. Tanaka J.W., Curran T., Porterfield A.L., and Collins D. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18 (2006) 1488-1497
46. Troje N.F., and Bülthoff H.H. Face recognition under varying poses: the role of texture and shape. Vision Res. 36 (1996) 1761-1771
47. Troje N.F., and Kersten D. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception 28 (1999) 483-487
48. Uddin L.Q., Kaplan J.T., Molnar-Szakacs I., Zaidel E., and Iacoboni M. Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal "mirror" network in the right hemisphere: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 25 (2005) 926-935
49. Van Lancker D. Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain Cog. 17 (1991) 64-92