Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer ozone profiles with aircraft observations during the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment-B

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 113, Issue 16, 2008, Pages

  Richards, Nigel A D ^a,b   Osterman, Gregory B ^a   Browell, Edward V ^c   Hair, Johnathan W ^c   Avery, Melody ^c   Li, Qinbin ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON MONOXIDE; GAS EMISSIONS; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; LIGHT ABSORPTION; METEOROLOGY; OPTICAL RADAR; OZONE; TROPOSPHERE;

AIRBORNE SURVEY; LIDAR; OZONE; SATELLITE DATA; TROPOSPHERE;

EID: 45849122922     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008815     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Beer, R. (2006), TES on the Aura mission: Scientific objectives, measurements, and analysis overview, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44(5), 1102-1105.
2. Beer, R., T. A. Glavich, and D. M. Rider (2001), Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer for the Earth Observing System's Aura satellite, Appl. Opt., 40, 2356-2367.
3. Bowman, K. W., T. Steck, H. M. Worden, J. Worden, S. Clough, and C. Rodgers (2002), Capturing time and vertical variability of tropospheric ozone: A study using TES nadir retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D23), 4723, doi:10.1029/2002JD002150.
4. Brasseur, G. P., D. A. Haulgastine, S. Walters, P. J. Rasch, J. F. Muller, C. Granier, and X. X. Tie (1998), MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 28,265-28,289.
5. Browell, E. V., et al. (1996), Ozone and aerosol distributions and air mass characteristics over the South Atlantic Basin during the burning season, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 24,043-24,068.
6. Browell, E. V., S. Ismail, and W. B. Grant (1998), Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) measurements from air and space, Appl. Phys. B, 67, 399-410.
7. Browell, E. V., et al. (2003a), Large-scale ozone and aerosol distributions, air mass characteristics, and ozone fluxes over the western Pacific Ocean in late-winter/early-spring, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D20), 8805, doi:10. 1029/2002JD003290.
8. Browell, E. V., et al. (2003b), Ozone, aerosol, potential vorticity, and trace gas trends observed at high latitudes over North America from February to May 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D4), 8369, doi:10.1029/2001JD001390.
9. Eastman, J. A., and D. H. Stedman (1977), A fast response sensor for ozone eddy-correlation flux measurements, Atmos. Environ., 11, 1209-1211.
10. Gregory, G. L., C. H. Hudgins, J. Ritter, and M. Lawrence (1987), In situ ozone instrumentation for 10-Hz measurements: Development and evaluation, paper presented at Sixth Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Am. Meteorol. Soc., New Orleans, La., 12-16 Jan.
11. Kulawik, S. S., et al. (2006), TES atmospheric profile retrieval characterization: An orbit of simulated observations, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44(5), 1324.
12. Logan, J. A. (1999), An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D13), 16,115-16,149.
13. Nassar, R., et al. (2008), Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer nadir ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S17, doi:10.1029/2007JD008819.
14. Osterman, G., et al. (2006), Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer TES L2 data user's guide, version 2.00, 1 June 2006, report, Jet Propul. Lab., Calif. Inst. of Technol., Pasadena.
15. Park, M., W. J. Randel, D. E. Kinnison, R. R. Garcia, and W. Choi (2004), Seasonal variations of methane, water vapor, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide near the tropopause: Satellite observations and model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D03302, doi:10.1029/ 2003JD003706.
16. Pearson, R. W., and D. H. Stedman (1980), Instrumentation for fast response ozone measurements from aircraft, Atmos. Tech., 12, 51-55.
17. Richter, D. A., E. V. Browell, C. F. Butler, and N. S. Higdon (1997), Advanced airborne UV DIAL system for stratospheric and tropospheric ozone and aerosol measurements, in Advances in Atmospheric Remote Sensing With Lidar, edited by A. Ansmann et al., pp. 395-398, Springer, New York.
18. Rodgers, C. (2000), Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Sci., Hackensack, N. J.
19. Rodgers, C. D., and B. J. Connor (2003), Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D3), 4116, doi:10.1029/2002JD002299.
20. Worden, H. M., et al. (2007), Comparisons of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) ozone profiles to ozonesondes: Methods and initial results, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D03309, doi:10.1029/2006JD007258.
21. Worden, J. S., S. S. Kulawik, M. Shepard, S. Clough, H. Worden, K. Bowman, and A. Goldman (2004), Predicted errors of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer nadir retrievals from spectral window selection, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D09308, doi:10.1029/2004JD004522.