Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Rodgers, Clive D ^a   Connor, Brian J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Intercomparison; Inverse methods; Optimal estimation; Profile retrieval; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 1642319758     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002jd002299     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bretherton, C. S., C. Smith, and J. M. Wallace, An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data, J. Clim., 5, 541, 1992.
2. Connor, B. J., D. E. Siskind, J. J. Tsou, A. Parrish, and E. E. Remsberg, Ground-based microwave observations of ozone in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 16,757-16,770, 1994.
3. Connor, B. J., A. Parrish, J.-J. Tsou, and M. P. McCormick, Error analysis for the ground-based microwave ozone measurements during STOIC, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 9283-9292, 1995.
4. Drummond, J. R., Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT), in The Use of EOS for Studies of Atmospheric Physics, edited by J. C. Gille and G. Visconti, pp. 77-101, North-Holland, New York, 1992.
5. Drummond, J. R., and G. S. Mand, The Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument: Overall performance and calibration requirements, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 314-320, 1996.
6. Kurylo, M. J., and R. J. Zander, The NDSC-Its status after ten years of operation, in Proceedings of the Quadrennial Ozone Symposium, Sapporo 2000, pp. 167-168, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan, 2001.
7. 4: Forward model studies of the MOPITT instrument, Appl. Opt., 34, 6976, 1995.
8. Pan, L., J. C. Gille, D. P. Edwards, P. L. Bailey, and C. D. Rodgers, Retrieval of tropospheric carbon monoxide for the MOPITT experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 32,277-32,290, 1998.
9. Rodgers, C. D., Retrieval of atmospheric temperature and composition from remote measurements of thermal radiation, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 14, 609-624, 1976.
10. Rodgers, C. D., Characterization and error analysis of profiles retrieved from remote sounding measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5587-5595, 1990.
11. Rodgers, C. D., Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Sci., River Edge, N. J., 2000.
12. Russell, J. M., and H. G. J. Smit, Data quality, in SPARC/IOC/GAW assessment of trends in the vertical distribution of ozone, SPARC report 1, World Meteorol Organ. Ozone Res, and Monit. Proj. Rep. 43, edited by N. Harris, R. Hudson, and C. Phillips, chap. 2, Geneva, 1998.