A classification of differences between similar business processes

Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 37-46

  Dijkman, Remco ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESSES; BUSINESS UNITS; DIFFERENCE DETECTIONS; MERGING PROCESSES;

MERGING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DECENTRALIZED CONTROL;

EID: 45849116221     PISSN: 15417719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2007.4383980     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. W. van der Aalst, A. Dreiling, F. Gottschalk, M. Rosemann, and M. Jansen-Vullers. Configurable process models as a basis for reference modeling. In A. Haller, C. Bussler: BPM Workshops, LNCS 3812, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 512-518.
2. W. van der Aalst. Business Alignment: Using Process Mining as a Tool for Delta Analysis and Conformance Testing. Requirements Engineering 10, 2005, pp. 198-211.
3. W. van der Aalst and T. Basten. Inheritance of Workflows: An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change. Theoretical Computer Science 270(1-2), 2002, pp. 125-203.
4. W. van der Aalst, and S. Jablonski. Dealing with Workflow Change: Identification of Issues and Solutions. International Journal of Computer Systems, Science, and Engineering 15(5), 2000, pp. 267-276.
5. B. Benatallah, F. Casati, D. Grigori, H. R. Motahari Nezhad, and F. Toumani. Developing Adapters for Web Services Integration. In: CAiSE 2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005, pp. 415-429.
6. T. Curran, and G. Keller. SAP R/3 Business Blueprint. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998.
7. R.M. Dijkman. Choreography-Based Design of Business Collaborations. BETA Working Paper WP-181, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2006.
8. R.M. Dijkman, and M. Dumas. Service-oriented Design: a Multi-viewpoint Approach. In J. Yang and C. Bussler (guest eds.): International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), 13(4), pp. 337-368, 2004.
9. M. Dumas, M. Spork, and K. Wang. Adapt or Perish: Algebra and Visual Notation for Interface Adaptation. In: BPM 2006, LNCS 4102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 65-80.
10. C. Ellis, and K. Keddara. A Workflow Change is a Workflow. In: BPM 2000, LNCS 1806, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2000, pp. 516-534.
11. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S.B. Navathe. A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys 18(4): 323-364, December 1986.
12. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Workflow Evolution. Data & Knowledge Engineering 24, 1998, pp. 211-238.
13. H. Frank, and J. Eder. Towards an Automatic Integration of Statecharts. In: ER 1999, LNCS 1728, Berlin, Germany, 1999, pp. 430-444.
14. R. van Glabbeek. The Linear Time - Branching Time Spectrum I: The Semantics of Concrete Sequential Processes. In: Handbook of Process Algebra. Elsevier, 2001, pp. 3-99.
15. G. Grossmann, Y. Ren, M. Schrefl, and M. Stumptner. Behavior Based Integration of Composite Business Processes. In: BPM 2005, LNCS 3649, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005, pp. 186-204.
16. E. Kindler, and M. Nüttgens (eds.). Workshop on Business Process Reference Models, Nancy, France, September 2005.
17. A. Martens. On Compatibility of Web Services. Petri Net Newsletter 65, 2003, pp. 12-20.
18. P. Massuthe, W. Reisig, K. Schmidt. An Operating Guideline Approach to the SOA. Annals of Mathematics, Computing & Teleinformatics 1(3), 2005, pp. 35-43.
19. J. Mendling, and C. Simon. Business Process Design by View Integration. In: BPM 2006 Workshops, LNCS 4103, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2006, pp. 55-64.
20. Object Management Group. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. Specification ptc/04-10-02, 2004.
21. G. Preuner, S. Conrad, and M. Schrefl. View Integration of Behavior in Object-Oriented Databases. Data & Knowledge Engineering 36(2), 2001, pp. 153-183.
22. M. Reichert, and P. Dadam. ADEPTflex-supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. JIIS 10(2), 1998, pp. 93-129.
23. S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, and P. Dadam. Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Changes in Workflow Systems - a Survey. Data & Knowledge Engineering 50, 2004, pp. 9-34.
24. M. Rosemann, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. Information Systems 32(1 ), 2007, pp. 1-23.
25. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent. View Integration: A Step Forward in Solving Structural Conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 6(2): 258-274, April 1994.