View integration of behavior in object-oriented databases

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 153-183

  Preuner, Günter ^a   Conrad, Stefan ^b   Schrefl, Michael ^c  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DATA STRUCTURES; LIFE CYCLE; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PETRI NETS;

OBJECT-ORIENTED DATABASES; SEMANTIC DATA MODELS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035153378     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-023X(00)00043-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Batini C., Lenzerini M., Navathe S.B. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys. 18(4):1986;323-364.
2. P. Bichler, Conceptual design of secure workflow systems: an object-oriented approach to the uniform modeling of workflows, organizations, and security, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Linz, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, 1998.
3. P. Bichler, G. Preuner, M. Schrefl, Workflow Transparency, in: A. Olivé, J.A. Pastor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE '97), Barcelona, Spain, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1250, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 423-436.
4. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The AddisonWesley Object Technology Series. 1998;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. S. Conrad, I. Schmitt, C. Türker, Considering integrity constraints during federated database design, in: S.M. Embury, N.J. Fiddian, W.A. Gray, A.C. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th British National Conference on Databases, Cardiff, UK (BNCOD 16), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1405, Springer, Berlin, 1998, pp. 119-133.
6. Dayal U., Hwang H.-Y. View definition and generalization for database integration in a multidatabase system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 10(6):1984;628-645.
7. Embley D.W. Object Database Development: Concepts and Principles. 1998;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
8. Fokkink W. Introduction to Process Algebra. 2000;Springer, Berlin.
9. H. Frank, J. Eder, Integration of statecharts, in: M. Halper (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, New York, USA (CoopIS '98), IEEE Computer Society, 1998, pp. 364-372.
10. H. Frank, J. Eder, Towards an automatic integration of statecharts, in: J. Akoka, M. Bouzeghoub, I. Comyn-Wattiau, E. Métais (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Confernece on Conceptual Modeling (ER '99), Paris, France, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1728, Springer, 1999, pp. 430-444.
11. M. García-Solaco, F. Saltor, M. Castellanos, A structure based schema integration methodology, in: P.S. Yu, A.L.P. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Taipei, Taiwan, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995, pp. 505-512.
12. Harel D. Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming. 8:1987;231-274.
13. K. Hiramatsu, K. Okada, H. Hayami, Interworkflow system: Coordination of each workflow system among multiple organizations, in: Proceedings of the Third IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, New York, USA (CoopIS '98), IEEE Computer Society, 1998, pp. 354-363.
14. P. Johannesson, Schema transformations as an aid in view integration, in: C. Rolland, F. Bodart, C. Cauvet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Paris, France (CAiSE '93), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 685, Springer, 1993, pp. 71-92.
15. Johannesson P. Schema standardization as an aid in view integration. Information Systems. 19(3):1994;275-290.
16. G. Kappel, M. Schrefl, Object/behavior diagrams, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Data Engineering, Kobe, Japan (ICDE '91), April 1991, pp. 530-539.
17. J. Klingemann, J. Wäsch, K. Aberer, Deriving service models in cross-organizational workflows, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Research Issues on Data Engineering: Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises (RIDE), Sydney, Australia, IEEE Computer Society, 1999, pp. 100-107.
18. P. Lang, W. Obermair, M. Schrefl, Modeling business rules with situation/activation diagrams, in: A. Gray, P.-A. Larson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, Birmingham, UK, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997, pp. 455-464.
19. W. Obermair, Active object-oriented databases: from conceptual design to logical design, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Linz, Data & Knowledge Engineering Group, 1998.
20. Peterson J.L. Petri nets. ACM Computing Surveys. 9(3):1977;223-252.
21. G. Preuner, Definition of behavior in object-oriented databases by view integration, Ph.D. Theses on Database Systems and Information Systems (DISDBIS), vol. 53, infix-Verlag, 1999.
22. G. Preuner, M. Schrefl, Observation consistent integration of business processes, in: C. McDonald (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Database Conference (ADC '98), Perth, Australia, Australian Computer Science Communications, vol. 20, Springer, Berlin, 1998, pp. 201-212.
23. G. Preuner, M. Schrefl, Observation consistent integration of views of object life-cycles, in: S.M. Embury, N.J. Fiddian, W.A. Gray, A.C. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD 16), Cardiff, Wales, UK, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1405, Springer, Berlin, 1998, pp. 32-48.
24. I. Schmitt, G. Saake, Merging inheritance hierarchies for database integration, in: Proceedings of the Third IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS '98), New York, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998, pp. 322-331.
25. M. Schrefl, A comparative analysis of view integration methodologies, in: R.R. Wagner, R. Traunmüller, H.C. Mayr (Eds.), Proceedings Fachtagung EMISA: Informationsbedarfsermittlung und -analyse für den Entwurf von Informationssystemen, GI-Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 143, Springer, Berlin, 1987, pp. 119-136.
26. M. Schrefl, E. Neuhold, Object class definition by generalization using upward inheritance, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Los Angeles, USA, IEEE Computer Society, 1988, pp. 4-13.
27. M. Schrefl, M. Stumptner, Behavior consistent extension of object life cycles, in: P. Papazoglou (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modeling, Gold Coast, Australia (OO-ER '95), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1021, Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 133-145.
28. M. Schrefl, M. Stumptner, Behavior consistent refinement of object life cycles, in: D.W. Embley, R.C. Goldstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Los Angeles, USA (ER '97), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1331, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 155-168.
29. Schrefl M., Stumptner M. On the design of behavior consistent specialization of object life cycles in OBD and UML. Papazoglou M., Spaccapietra S., Tari Z. Advances in Object-Oriented Data Modeling. 2000;MIT Press, Cambridge.
30. Sheth A., Larson J. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys. 22(3):1990;183-236.
31. Thieme C., Siebes A. Guiding schema integration by behavioural information. Information Systems. 20(4):1995;305-316.
32. M. Vermeer, P. Apers, Behaviour specification in database interoperation, in: A. Olivé, J.A. Pastor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Barcelona, Spain (CAiSE '97), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1250, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 425-435.
33. Vernadat F.B. Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications. 1996;Chapman & Hall, London.