Evaluation of Brazilian light ketchups II: Quantitative descriptive and physicochemical analysis

Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 107-115

  Bannwart, Gisele Cristina Maziero De Campos ^a   Bolini, Helena Maria André ^a   Toledo, Maria Cecília De Figueiredo ^a   Kohn, Ana Paula Contel ^a   Cantanhede, Gisele Cristina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ketchup; Light; Physicochemical characteristics; QDA; Sweeteners

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 45849093269     PISSN: 01012061     EISSN: 1678457X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-20612008000100016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AC Nielsen Marketing Intelligence Service. Tendências do Mercado Brasileiro. São Paulo: Mercearia Salgada (Salty Products), 2004. p. 353-355.
2. AOAC. Offi cial Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16. ed. USA: Maryland, 1996.
3. BANNWART, G. C. M. C. et al. Evaluation of brazilian light catchups I: Time-intensity and consumer acceptance studies. Boletim do Centro de Pesquisa e Processamento de Alimentos, Curitiba, v. 24, n. 2, p. 457-474, 2006.
4. BRASIL. Resolução RDC No 276 de 22/09/2005. Disponível em: 〈http://www.anvisa.gov.br〉. Acesso em: nov. 2005.
5. DAMÁSIO, M. H.; COSTELL, E. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Rev. Agroquím. Tecnol. Alim., Valencia, v. 3, n. 1/2, p. 165-178, 1991.
6. DENNY, C. Tomato Products. National Food Processors Association Bulletin 27-L. 7. ed. Washington, USA: Nacional Canners Association, 1997. 199p.
7. GOOSE, P. G.; BINSTED, R. Tomato Paste - Pureé, Juice & Powder. 2. ed. London: Food Trade Press Ltda, 1973. 151p.
8. GOULD, W. A. Tomato production, processing and technology. 3. ed. Maryland: CTI Publications, Inc. 1992, 536p. (cap. 11, p. 233-242).
9. HAYES, W. A.; SMITH, P. G.; MORRIS, A. E. J. The production and quality of tomato concentrates. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Boca Raton, v. 38, n. 7, p. 537-564, 1998.
10. KILCAST, D. Improving sweetness quality in foods. International Sugar Journal, United Kingdom, v. 104, n. 1244, p. 340-344, 2002.
11. LAWLESS, H. T.; HEYMANN, H. Sensory Evaluation of Food - Principles and Practice. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1999. 827p.
12. MEILGAARD, M.; CIVILLE, G. V.; CARR, B. T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 3. ed. New York: CRC Press, 1999. 281p.
13. MOSKOVITZ, H. R. Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods. Westport: Food & Nutrition Press, 1983. 605p.
14. PORRETA, S. Analytical profiling of ketchup. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v. 57, n. 2, p. 293-301, 1991.
15. PORRETA, S.; BIRZI, A. Effect of storage temperature on sensory shelf life of two catchups made of wine or spirit vinegar. Sciences des Aliments, Paris, v. 15, n. 6 p. 529-540, 1995.
16. PORRETA, S. et al. Qualqity evaluation of tomato pulp. Food Chemistry, v. 47, n. 4, p. 379-386, 1993.
17. SAS Institute. SAS User's guide: statistics, v. 8.2. Cary, USA: SAS Institute, 2003.
18. STONE, H.; SIDEL, J. L. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 2. ed. London: Academic Press, Inc., 1993. 336p.
19. STONE, H. et al. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technology, Chicago, v. 28, n. 1, p. 24, 26, 28-29, 32, 34, 1974.
20. VARELA, P. et al. Sensory and instrumental texture measures on ketchup made with different thickeners. Journal of Texture Studies, v. 34, n. 3, p. 317-330, 2003.
21. WHO. World Health Organization. Diet, Nutrition and the perception of chronic diseases. Report of a WHO Study Group. WHO Technical Report Series, Geneva, n. 912, 2003.
22. _. Nutrition - Controling the global obesity epidemic. Disponível em: 〈http://www.who.int.int/nut/obs.htm〉. Acesso em: dez. 2005.
23. WU, J. S. B.; NELSON, P. E. Tomato products. In: SMITH, D.S., CASH, J. N., NIP, W-K & HUI, Y. H. Processing Vegetables - Science and Technology, chap.14, p. 389-415. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Co, Inc., 1997.