Sensory and instrumental texture measures on ketchup made with different thickeners

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 317-330

  Varela, P ^a   Gambaro A ^a   Gimenez A M ^a   Duran I ^a   Lema, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SENSORS; STARCH; VISCOSITY;

THICKENING AGENTS;

FOOD PRODUCTS;

CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0043285133     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2003.tb01064.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BARBOSA-CÁNOVAS, G.V. and PELEG, M. 1983. Flow parameters of selected commercial semi-liquid food products. J. Texture Studies 14, 213-234.
2. BOURNE, M. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York.
3. CARADEC, P.L. and NELSON, P.E. 1985. Effect of temperature on the serum viscosity of tomato juice. J. Food Sci. 50, 1497-1498.
4. CARADEC, P.L., NELSON, P.E. and TAKADA, N. 1985. Tomato products: A new serum separation measurement. J. Food Sci. 50, 1493-1494.
5. DAMASIO, M.H. and COSTELL, E. 1991. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: Generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Rev. Agroquím. Tecnol. Aliment. 31(2), 165-178.
6. GLICKSMAN, M. 1969. Gum Technology in the Food Industry. Academic Press, New York.
7. GLICKSMAN, M. 1982. Food Hydrocolloids. Vol. 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
8. GOULD, W.A. 1992. Tomato Production, Processing and Technology. CTI Publications, Timonium, Maryland.
9. HOUGH, G., CALIFARO, A.N., BERTOLA, N.C., BEVILACQUA, A.E., MARTÍNEZ, E., VEGA, M.J. and ZARITZKY, N.E. 1996. Partial least squares correlations between sensory and instrumental measurements of flavor and texture for Reggianito grating cheese. Food Qual. Pref. 7, 47-53.
10. HOWARD, D.W. 1991. A look at viscosimetry. Viscosity measurements help us understand flow behaviour. In Special Report: Viscosity Measurement. Food Technol. 45(7), 82-84.
11. ISO 1988. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms. ISO 8589:1988, Geneve, Switzerland.
12. ISO 1994. Sensory analysis. Identification and selection of descriptors for establishing a sensory profile by a multidimensional approach. ISO 11035:1994, Geneve, Switzerland.
13. JELLINEK, G. 1985. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Theory and Practice. Ellis Horwood Ltd., England.
14. KOKINI, J. 1985. Fluid and semisolid food texture and texture-taste interactions. Food Technol. 39, 86-94.
15. MARSH, G.L., LEONARD, S.J. and BUHLERT, J.E. 1979. Yield and Quality of Catsup Produced to a Standard Solids and Consistency Level. II. Influence of Handling Practices, Break Temperature and Cultivar. J. Food Processing Preservation 3, 195-212.
16. MARTENS, M. and MARTENS, H. 1986. Partial Least Squares Regression. In Statistical Procedures in Food Research, (J.R. Piggot, ed.) pp. 293-359, Elsevier Applied Science, London.
17. M.S.P. 1994. Reglamento Bromatológico Nacional. Decreto 315/994. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Uruguay.
18. RACE, S.W. 1991. Improved product quality through viscosity measurement. In Special Report: Viscosity Measurement. Food Technol. 45, 86-89.
19. SHAMA, F., PARKINSON, C. and SHERMAN, P. 1973. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity. I. Nonoral methods. J. Texture Studies 4, 102-110.
20. UNIT 1970. Norma para la determinación del residuo seco en alimentos de origen vegetal. Norma UNIT 249/70. UNIT. Uruguay.
21. UPASANA-RANI and BAINS, G.S. 1987. Flow behaviour of tomato ketchups. J. Texture Studies 18, 125-135.