Does New Zealand have an innovation system for biotechnology?

Technovation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 103-112

  Marsh, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Innovation system; New Zealand

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS;

INNOVATION SYSTEMS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0037303961     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00153-0     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arundel A., Rose A. The diffusion of environmental biotechnology in Canada: adoption strategies and cost offsets. Technovation. 19:(9):1999;551-560.
2. Australian Venture Capital Journal. Almost $1 billion invested in 1999. Australian Venture Capital Journal. 9:(85):2000;6-14.
3. Bartholomew S. National systems of biotechnology innnovation: complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies. 28:(2):1997;241-266.
4. Biotechnology Australia. Biotechnology and Innovation in Australia. 2000;Biotechnology Australia, Canberra.
5. BIOTENZ, 1998. BIOTENZ promotional brochure (promotional brochure), Auckland.
6. Bud R. History of 'biotechnology'. Nature. 337:(6202):1989;10.
7. Caragata, P., 2000. Could you sell your great ideas to a venture capitalist? The Independent Business Weekly 8 March, 12.
8. Carlsson B., Jacobsson S., Holmén M., Rickne A. Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Paper presented at the DRUID's Summer Conference on National Innovation Systems, Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy, Rebild, Denmark. 1999.
9. Cassie F. University GM research 'can of worms'. NZ Education Review. 4:(48):2000;1.
10. Clark, D.N., Pavlovich, K., Simpson, B., 1999. The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd. Waikato Management School, Department of Strategic Management and Leadership.
11. Cole S., Phelan T.J. The scientific productivity of nations. Minerva. 37:1999;1-23.
12. Eliasson G., Eliasson Å. The pharmaceutical and biotechnological competence bloc and the development of Losec. Carlsson B. Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. vol. 10:1997;Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. Engelbrecht H.-J., Darroch J. A comparative macro-level assessment of New Zealand's national innovation system. Prometheus. 17:(3):1999;283-298.
14. Environmental Risk Management Authority. Briefing for the incoming government (ER-BR-01-1 11/99). 1999;Environmental Risk Management Authority, Wellington.
15. Ernst & Young, 1999. Bridging the gap: Ernst & Young's 13th Biotechnology Industry Annual report, Ernst & Young, Palo Alto, California.
16. Foltz J., Barham B., Kim K. Universities and agricultural biotechnology patents production. Agribusiness. 16:(1):2000;82-95.
17. Fontes M., Novais A.Q. The conditions for the development of a biotechnology industry in Portugal: the impact of country specific factors. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 10:(4):1998.
18. Foundation For Research Science and Technology. Strategic Portfolio Outline: Advance Biological Enterprises. 2000;Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, Wellington.
19. Fransman M., Tanaka S. The strengths and weaknesses of the Japanese innovation system in biotechnology. Fransman M., Junne G., Roobeek A. The Biotechnology Revolution? 1995;431-483 Blackwell, Oxford.
20. Freeman C. Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. 1987;Pinter Publishers, London.
21. van Geenhuizen M. How small biotechnology firms survive in the Dutch pharmaceutical industry: an exploratory analysis. Oakey R., During W., Mukhtar S.-M. New Technology-based Firms in the 1990s. vol. VI:1999;Pergamon, Amsterdam.
22. Hall B.H., Reenen J.V. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy. 29:(4-5):2000;449-469.
23. Hazeldine T. Taking New Zealand Seriously: The Economics of Decency. 1998;Harper Collins, New York.
24. Institute for Scientific Information, 2000. National Science Indicators on Diskette, 1981-98: Institute for Scientific Information.
25. Janszen F.H.A., Deganaars G.H. A dynamic analysis of the relations between the structure and the process of national systems of innovation using computer simulation: the case of the Dutch biotechnological sector. Research Policy. 27:(1):1998;37-54.
26. Joly P.-B., de Looze M.-A. An analysis of innovation strategies and industrial differentiation through patent applications: the case of plant biotechnology. Research Policy. 25:(7):1996;1027-1045.
27. Kennedy M.J. The evolution of the word biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology. 9:(7):1991;218-220.
28. Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. 1992;Pinter Publishers, London.
29. Malo, S., Geuna, A., 1999. Science-technology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology. SPRU (SPRU Electronic Working Paper No. 37).
30. Massey P. New Zealand: Market Liberalization in a Developed Economy. 1995;Macmillan, London.
31. Mazoyer P. A Study of the Innovation System for Biotechnology in New Zealand (report no. 1072). 1999;Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, Wellington.
32. McKelvey, M., 2001. Economics of biotechnology. In: W. Lazonick (Ed.), JEBM Handbook of Economics. International Thomson Business Press, London.
33. McMillan G.S., Narin F., Deeds D.L. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy. 29:(1):2000;1-8.
34. McNiven, C., 2001. Biotechnology Use and Development 1999. Statistics Canada, (88F006XIE No. 7).
35. Momma S., Sharp M. Developments in new biotechnology firms in Germany. Technovation. 19:(5):1999;267-282.
36. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. 1993;Oxford University Press, New York.
37. New Zealand Trade Development Board. Back to the Future New Zealand's Biotechnology Industry. 2000;New Zealand Trade Development Board, Auckland.
38. OECD, 1994. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators: Patent Manual 1994. OECD, Paris.
39. OECD, 1997. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (revised edition (1997)). OECD, Paris.
40. OECD, 1999. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999 Benchmarking Knowledge-based Economies. OECD, Paris.
41. Orsenigo L. The Emergence of Biotechnology. 1989;St Martin's Press, New York.
42. Petersen G. Science in New Zealand beyond 2000, Have we lost the plot? NZ Science Review. 55:(3):1998;4-10.
43. Rickne A. The growth of new technology-based firms: the case of biomaterials in Sweden, Massachusetts and Ohio. Carlsson B. New Technological Systems in the Bio Industries: An International Study. 1999;Kluwer, Dordrecht.
44. Rolleston W. Leveraging the biology revolution. Paper presented at the Conference: Opportunities for Collaboration between Business, CRI's and Tertiary Institutions, Auckland. 1999.
45. Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, 2001. Report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, Wellington.
46. Royal Society of New Zealand. Royal Commission on genetic modification. Royal Society Alert. 122:2000;1-14.
47. Saviotti P.P. Industrial structure and the dynamics of knowledge generation in biotechnology. Senker J. Biotechnology and Competitive Advantage: Europe's Firms and the US Challenge. 1998;19-43 Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
48. Sommer J. Voices from the grassroots of science: tales of hope and woe. Paper presented at The R&D Management Conference 2001: Levering Research and Technology, Wellington, NZ. 2001.
49. Springall, L., 2000. Where are the great ideas? Say venture capitalists. The Independent Business Weekly 5 July.
50. Stern, S., Porter, M.E., Furman, J.L., 2000. The determinants of national innovative capacity. National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper W7876).
51. US Congress. Biotechnology in a Global Economy (OTA-BA-494). 1991;Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.
52. Winsley P., Couchman P., Gilbertson D. Future developments for New Zealand's science and technology system. Prometheus. 16:(1):1998;57-68.
53. Wright, J.C., 2000. The Economics of Genetic Modification (Background paper prepared for the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification).