Musculoskeletal MR Imaging at 3 T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 533-545

  Meyer, James S ^a,b   Jaramillo, Diego ^a,b  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

3 T; MR imaging; Musculoskeletal; Pediatric

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ARTIFACT; CALCULATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETISM; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETER; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RELAXATION TIME; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES;

EID: 45549106879     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2008.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Barnewolt C.E., and Cheng T. Techniques, coils, pulse sequences, and contrast enhancement in pediatric musculoskeletal MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 (1998) 441-453
2. Al-Otaibi L., and Siegel M.J. The pediatric knee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 643-660
3. Stazzone M.M., and Hubbard A.M. The pediatric foot and ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 661-675
4. Azouz E.M., and Oudjhane K. Disorders of the upper extremity in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 677-695
5. Babyn P.S., Ranson M., and McCarville M.E. Normal bone marrow signal characteristics and fatty conversion. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 473-495
6. Sebag G.H. Disorders of the hip. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 627-641
7. Hernandez R.J., and Teo E.L. Diffuse bone marrow disorders in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 605-626
8. Jaramillo D., and Shapiro F. Musculoskeletal trauma in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 521-536
9. Jaramillo D., and Shapiro F. Growth cartilage normal appearance, variants, and abnormalities. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 455-471
10. Meyer J.S., and Dormans J.P. Differential diagnosis of pediatric musculoskeletal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 561-577
11. Gylys-Morin V.M. MR imaging of pediatric musculoskeletal inflammatory and infectious disorders. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6 3 (1998) 537-559
12. Jaramillo D., and Laor T. Pediatric musculoskeletal MRI: basic principles to optimize success. Pediatr Radiol 38 4 (2008) 379-391
13. Soher B.J., Dale B.M., and Merkle E.M. A review of MR physics: 3 T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15 (2007) 277-290
14. Gold G.E., Han E., Stainsby J., et al. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 343-351
15. Saupe N., Prussmann K.P., Luechinger R., et al. MR imaging of the wrist: comparison between 1.5 and 3 T MR imaging-preliminary experience. Radiology 234 (2005) 256-264
16. Kornaat P.R., Reeder S.B., Koo S., et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13 (2005) 338-344
17. Barth M.M., Smith M.P., Pedrosa I., et al. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 27 (2007) 1445-1464
18. Ramnath R.R. 3 T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (part 1): considerations, coils, and challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 (2006) 27-40
19. Tanenbaum L.N. Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 (2006) 1-15
20. Bolog N., Nanz D., and Weishaupt D. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1298-1307
21. Viano A.M., Gronemeyer S.A., Haliloglu M., et al. Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 18 (2000) 287-295
22. Stadler A., Schima W., Ba-Ssalamah A., et al. Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 1242-1255
23. Turner D.A., Rapoport M.I., Erwin W.D., et al. Truncation artifact: a potential pitfall in MR imaging of the menisci of the knee. Radiology 179 (1991) 629-633
24. Stanisz G.J., Odrobina E.E., Pun J., et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 54 (2005) 507-512
25. Duewell S.H., Ceckler T.L., Ong K., et al. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. Radiology 196 (1995) 551-555
26. Gold G.E., Suh B., Sawyer-Glover A., et al. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 1479-1486
27. Mosher T.J., Dardzinski B.J., and Smith M.B. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2-preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 214 (2000) 259-266
28. Krinsky G., Rofsky N.M., and Weinreb J.C. Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 (1996) 523-526
29. Kuhl C.K., Traber F., and Schild H.H. Whole-body high-field strength (3.0 T) MR imaging in clinical practice part 1. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 246 (2008) 675-696
30. Trattnig S., Pinker K., Ba-Ssalamah A., et al. The optimal use of contrast agents at high-field MRI. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1280-1287
31. Masi J.N., Newitt D., Sell C.A., et al. Optimization of gadodiamide concentration for MR arthrography at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 1754-1761
32. Glockner J.F., Hu H.H., Stanley D.W., et al. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 25 (2005) 1279-1297
33. Bauer J.S., Banerjee S., Henning T.D., et al. Fast high-spatial resolution MRI of the ankle with parallel imaging using GRAPPA at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 240-245
34. Magee T., and Williams D. 3.0 T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 371-375
35. Magee T., and Williams D. 3.0 T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 881-886
36. Wieners G., Detert J., Streitparth F., et al. High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 2176-2182
37. Sundberg T.P., Toomayan G.A., and Major N.M. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0 T MR imaging compared with 1.5 T MR arthrography: preliminary experience. Radiology 238 (2006) 706-711
38. Lenk S., Ludescher B., Martirosan P., et al. 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC. Rofo 176 (2004) 664-667
39. Lutterbey G., Behrends K., Falkenhausen M.V., et al. Is the body coil at 3 tesla feasible for the MRI evaluation of the painful knee? A comparative study. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 503-508
40. Bittersohl B., Huang T., Schneider E., et al. High-resolution MRI of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3 T: comparison of surface coil and volume coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2007) 701-707
41. Fischbach F., Bruhn H., Unterhauser F., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of medium T2 weighted fast spin echo, T1 weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences. Acta Radiol 46 (2005) 67-73
42. Barr C., Bauer J.S., Malfair D., et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 tesla and 1.5 tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament, and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 1518-1528
43. Link T.M., Sell C.A., Masi J.N., et al. 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology-ROC analysis in an experimental model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14 (2006) 63-70
44. Recht M.P., Goodwin D.W., Winalski C.S., et al. MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 899-914
45. Gold G.E., McCauley T.R., Gray M.L., et al. What's new in cartilage?. Radiographics 23 (2003) 1227-1242
46. von Engelhardt L.V., Kraft C.N., Pennekamp P.H., et al. The evaluation of articular cartilage lesions of the knee with a 3 Tesla magnet. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 23 (2007) 496-502
47. Watanabe A., Boesch C., Siebenrock K., et al. T2 mapping of hip articular cartilage in healthy volunteers at 3 T: a study of topographic variation. J Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2007) 165-171
48. 1p mapping of the knee joint at 3.0 T with parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 56 (2006) 563-571
49. Eckstein F., Buck R.J., Wyman B.T., et al. Quantitative imaging of cartilage morphology at 3.0 tesla in the presence of gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA). Magn Reson Med 58 (2007) 402-406
50. Zuo J., Li X., Banerjee S., et al. Parallel imaging of knee cartilage at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2007) 1001-1009