Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: Initial clinical experience

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 183, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1479-1486

  Gold, Garry E ^a   Suh, Brian ^a   Sawyer Glover, Anne ^a   Beaulieu, Christopher ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; IMAGING SYSTEM; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; ADULT; ANKLE; ANKLE INJURY; ARTIFACT; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE INJURY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; ANKLE INJURIES; ANKLE JOINT; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 15444367367     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831479     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Collins CM, Smith MB. Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of "90 degrees" RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:684-691
2. Duewell SH, Ceckler TL, Ong K, et al. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. Radiology 1995;196:551-555
3. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR 2004;183:343-351
4. Peh WC, Chan JH. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:179-191
5. White LM, Buckwalter KA. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:5-17
6. Shellock FG. Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:30-36
7. Brix G, Seebass M, Hellwig G, Griebel J. Estimation of heat transfer and temperature rise in partial-body regions during MR procedures: an analytical approach with respect to safety considerations. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:65-76
8. Hayes CW, Parellada JA. The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996;8:51-56
9. Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Haas SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1276-1284
10. Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Beaulieu CF, Vasanawala SS, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM. Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:700-709