Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy;Radykalna histerektomia oszczedzajaca unerwienie wegetatywne

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 92-98

  Skret, Andrzej ^a   Nowakowski, Błazej ^b   Skret Magierło, Joanna ^a   Włodzimierz, Baranowski ^c  

^a Medycznego Wydzia u Medycznego   (Poland)

^b Szpitalu Połozniczo Ginekologicznym ^*  (Poland)

^c MILITARY INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Gynecologic surgical procedures; Nerve sparing surgery; Radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMIC NERVE; CANCER STAGING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INJURY; INNERVATION; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW; SPLANCHNIC NERVE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; UTERUS;

AUTONOMIC PATHWAYS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; NEOPLASM STAGING; SPLANCHNIC NERVES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 45549101932     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Skret A. Wybór technik opercyjnych. W: Rozszerzone usuniecie macicy. pod red. Skret A, Piela A. Kraków: Wyd. Dream Publishing Company, 1995, 105-119.
2. Sonoda Y, Chi D, Carter J [et al.]. Initial experience with Dargent's operation: the radical vaginal trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008, 108, 214-219.
3. Schneider A. The sentinel concept in patients with cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2007, 963, 337-341.
4. Piver M, Rutledge F, Smith J. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974, 44, 265-272.
5. Sakamoto S, Takaziwa K. An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications with no loss of therapeutic results for invasive cervical cancer. Ballieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988, 2, 953-962.
6. Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y. Does the cardinal ligament of the uterus contain a nerve that should be preserved in radical hsyterectomy? Anat Sci Int. 2002, 77, 161-168.
7. Niikura H, Katahira A, Utsunomiya H, [et al.]. Surgical anatomy of intrapelvic fasciae and vesico-uterine ligament in nerve-sparing hysterectomy with fresh cadaver dissections. Tohuku J Exp Med. 2007, 212, 403-413.
8. Maas C, Kenter G, Trimbos J [et al.]. Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005, 84, 868-874.
9. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Kusamura S, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a pilot study. Tumori. 2003, 89, 497-501.
10. Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, [et al.]. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder fucntion. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005, 15, 389-397.
11. Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumuura N, [et al.] Precise anatomy of the vesico-uterine ligament for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007, 104, 186-191.
12. Maas C, Trimbos J, DeRuiter M, [et al.]. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspectrive. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003, 48, 271-279.
13. Kobayashi T. Abdominal radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cancer of cervix. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Nanzando. 1961, 178-187.
14. Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921, 33, 335-341.
15. Yakubi Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, [et al.]. Radical hsyterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol. Oncol. 2000, 77, 155-163.
16. Höckel M, Konerding M, Huessel C. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hsyterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 178, 971-976.
17. Maas C. Japanese nerve-preserving techniques in surgery for cancer of the uterine cervix. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999, 29, 517-518.
18. Trimbos J, Maas C, DeRuiter M, [et al.]. A nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gyaecol Cancer. 2001, 11, 180-186.
19. Possover M, Quakernack J, Chiantera V. The LANN technique to reduce postoperative functional morbidity in laparoscopic radical pelvic sdurgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2005, 201, 913-917.
20. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, [et al.]. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004, 93, 307-314.
21. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, [et al.]. Type II versus type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006, 102, 256-262.
22. Possover M. Technical modification of the nerve-sparing laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy type 3 for better reproducibility of this procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2003, 90, 245-247.
23. Querlu D, Narducci F, Poulard V, [et al.]. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol. 2002, 85, 154-158.
24. Ebert A, Ulrich U, Beckmann M, [et al.]. Unanswered questions in the management of cervical cancer. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2006, 128, 23-26.
25. Kuwabara Y, Suzuki M, Hashimoto M, [et al.]. New method to prevent bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynæcol Res. 2000, 26, 1-8.
26. Sasaki H, Yoshida T, Noda k, [et al.]. Urethral pressure profiles following radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1982, 59, 101-104.
27. Pieterse Q, Maas C, ter Kuile M, [et al.]. An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006, 16, 1119-1129.
28. Maas C, ter Kuile M, Laan E, [et al.]. Objective assessment of sexual arousal in woman with a history of hysterectomy. BJOG. 2004, 111, 456-462.